Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T17:41:44.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relative Commercial and Operational Properties of Short-Range Transport Aeroplanes Powered by Turbine and Reciprocating Engines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

C. F. Toms*
Affiliation:
Hunting Percival Aircraft Ltd.

Extract

There have recently appeared a number of papers and notes bearing on the merits of turbo-prop vis-a-vis turbo-jet transport aeroplanes, mostly exhibiting specific favour towards one type or the other, but disagreeing among themselves and all based upon investigations which, it is contended here, are incomplete.

The basis used has invariably been a comparison of the relative direct operating costs per unit of weight (i.e. per passenger or per ton) per mile, and the relative earning capacities have not been considered. This, it is believed, is a serious omission which can only lead to a distorted assessment and erroneous conclusions.

The author has been associated with a thorough-going investigation into the relative merits of twin-engined turbo-prop, turbo-jet, and reciproeating-engined aeroplanes, all designed on a strictly comparable basis to do, as far as the performance of suitable available engines would allow, the same job in terms of capacity payload and associated operational stage length, take-off and landing performance and one-engine-inoperative climb performance in given atmospheric and altitude conditions.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note on page 561 * (e) These ratios reflect the differing “ Basic ” weights of the three kinds of aeroplane; the Maintenance and Overhaul costs per pound of take-off thrust are roughly in the ratio 2:1:1.