Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T02:16:29.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research on Aerodynamic Noise From Jets and Associated Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

E. J. Richards*
Affiliation:
University of Southhampton

Summary

After two years research work in the Universities of this country and elsewhere, there is need for a comprehensive review of the present position on the suppression of aerodynamic noise from jet engines. This report outlines the fundamental understanding of the problem that has been achieved, the basic experimental work done, and the noise suppression techniques which have been suggested.

A study is made of measured noise levels on advanced types of engines and an analysis is made of reductions required and so far achieved with the proposed noise suppression devices. While the basic principles underlying noise formation, both in subsonic and supersonic jet streams are beginning to be understood, the noise reductions so far achieved are still insufficient and warrant an extended programme of research.

The report includes helicopter noise analyses with pressure and pulse jets, and touches on the problem of structural fatigue in the vicinity of a jet stream.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hayhurst, J. D. (1952). An Investigation into the Acoustic Screening of Aircraft on the Ground. Ministry of Civil Aviation, Aircraft Branch Technical Note 10. (March 1952.) A.R.C. 15, 109—Civ. 277.Google Scholar
2. N.P.L. Reports on Analyses of Noise on the Ground from the " Comet "; Aircraft both on the Ground and in Flight. M.O.S. Aircraft Noise Suppression Committee Report, No. N.C.122—Pt. 3.Google Scholar
3. Hubbard, H. H. (1952). A Survey of the Aircraft-Noise Problem with Special Reference to its Physical Aspects. N.A.C.A. Technical Note 2701. May 1952.Google Scholar
4. Parrack, H. O. (1950). Aircraft Noise and Noise Suppression Facilities—An Evaluation. Biophysics Branch. Aero Medical Laboratory, Air Material Command. Presented to The Joint Conference—Air Material Command—Aircraft Industries Association, Loss Angeles. April 1950.Google Scholar
5. Lighthill, M. J. (1952). On Sound Generated Aerodynamically, I. General Theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. A. Vol. 211, p. 564. 1952.Google Scholar
6. Powell, A. The Mechanics and Reduction of Choked Jet Noise, Pt. I. University of Southampton (awaiting publication).Google Scholar
7. Powell, A. The Mechanics and Reduction of Choked Jet Noise, Pt. II. The Reduction of Choked Jet Noise. University of Southampton (awaiting publication).Google Scholar
8. Powell, Alan. Communicated by Prof. E. J. Richards (1951). First Noise Research Interim Report—A " Schlieren" Study of Small Scale Air Jets and Some Noise Measurements on Two-inch Diameter Air Jets. A.R.C. 14,726—F.M. 1694. (1st December 1951.)Google Scholar
9. Powell, Alan. Communicated by Prof. E. J. Richards (1952). On the Noise Emanating from a Two-dimensional Jet above the Critical Pressure. Dept. of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Southampton. A.R.C. 15,472— F.M. 1836. (Reed. 8th December 1952.) (25th June 1952.)Google Scholar
10. Lighthill, M. J. (1952). On the Energy Scattered from the Interaction of Turbulence with Sound or Shock Waves. Dept. of Mathematics, University of Manchester. A.R.C. 15,432—F.M. 1825. (1st December 1952.)Google Scholar
11. von Gierke, , Parrack, , Gammon, and Hansen, (1952). , The Noise Field of a Turbo-jet Engine. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Vol. 24, No. 2. March 1952.Google Scholar
12. Lilley, G. M. Aerodynamic Noise Work at the Collge of Aeronautics. Paper read before the 1952 Congress of Applied Physics at Istanbul.Google Scholar
13. F.89. Ground Noise Muffler. Northrop Aircraft Inc. Report PD-30.Google Scholar
14. Hubbard, H. H. and Lassiter, L. W. (1952). Experimental Studies of Jet Noise. San Diego Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. November 1952.Google Scholar
15. Lee, R. and Fitzpatrick, H. M. (1952). Measurements of Turbulence Noise Radiated by Small Jets. San Diego Meeting, A.S.A. November 1952.Google Scholar
16. Powell, A. (1951). Some Experimental Observations on the Behaviour of Free Air Jets. University of Southampton. May 1951.Google Scholar
17. Westley, R. and Lilley, G. M. (1952). An Investigation of the Noise Field from a Small Jet and Methods for its Reduction. College of Aeronautics Report No. 53. A.R.C. 14,719—F.M. 1692—E.P. 174. Errata—received 26th May 1952. (January 1952.)Google Scholar
18. Richards, E. J. A Proposal for Focusing Schlieren Systems suitable for the Measurements of Eddy Movement and Shock Wave Oscillation. Dept. of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
19. Powell, Alan. Communicated by Prof. E. J. Richards (1952). An Examination of the Influence of the Exit Velocity Profile on the Noise of a Two-inch Diameter Jet. Dept. of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Southampton. A.R.C. 15,473—F.M. 1837. (Received 8th December 1952.) (22nd July 1952.)Google Scholar
20. Measurements of the Effect of Water Injection on the Noise of a Rocket Motor. N.P.L. Physics Dept. Report, 14th November 1951.Google Scholar
21. Powell, A. (1952). A Measurement of the Noise of a Pulse Jet. University of Southampton. October 1952.Google Scholar
22. Veneklasen, P. S. (1952). Noise Characteristics of Pulsejet Engines. San Diego Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. November 1952.Google Scholar
23. Noise Measurements on a Rotating Helicopter Pressure Jet. Private communication from N. Fleming, N.P.L.Google Scholar
24. Curle, N. (1953). The Mechanics of Edge Tows. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, Vol. 216, p. 412. 1953.Google Scholar
25. Powell, A. Communicated by Prof. E. J. Richards (1952). On Edge Tows and Associated Phenomena. University of Southampton. October 1952.Google Scholar