Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T02:22:19.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Large Eddy Simulation of a complete Harrier aircraft in ground effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

G. J. Page
Affiliation:
g.j.page@lboro.ac.uk, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
J. J. McGuirk
Affiliation:
j.j.mcguirk@lboro.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate the viability of using the large eddy simulation (LES) CFD methodology to model a representative, complete STOVL aircraft geometry at touch down. The flowfield beneath such a jet-borne vertical landing aircraft is inherently unsteady. Hence, it is argued in the present work that the LES technique is the most suitable tool to predict both the mean flow and unsteady fluctuations, and, with further development and validation testing, this approach could be a replacement, and certainly a complementary aid, to expensive rig programmes. The numerical method uses a compressible solver on a mixed element unstructured mesh. Examination of instantaneous flowfield predictions from these LES calculations indicate close similarity with many flow features identified from ground effect flow visualisations, which are well known to be difficult to model using RANS-based CFD. Whilst significant further work needs to be carried out, these calculations show that LES could be a practical tool to model, for example, Hot Gas Ingestion for the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kuhn, R.E., Margason, R.J. and Curtis, P., Jet Induced Effects: the Aerodynamics of Jet and Fan Powered V/STOL Aircraft in Hover and Transition, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 217, Lu, F.K., (Ed), AIAA Publication, 2006.Google Scholar
2. Roth, K.R., Comparison of CFD with experiment for a geometrically simplified STOVL model, AIAA-96-2431, 1996.Google Scholar
3. Chaderjian, N.M., Pandya, S.A., Ahmad, J.U. and Murman, S.C., Parametric time-dependent Navier Stokes computations for a YAV-8B Harrier in Ground Effect, AIAA-2002-0950, 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, USA, January 2002.Google Scholar
4. Pandya, S.A., Chaderjian, N.M. and Ahmad, J., Parametric study of a YAV-8B Harrier in ground effect using time-dependent Navier Stokes computations, AIAA-2002-3056, 20th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, St Pail, Miss, USA, June 2002.Google Scholar
5. Chaderjian, N.M., Pandya, S.A., Ahmad, J. and Murman, S.C., Progress towards generation of a Navier-Stokes database for a Harrier in ground effect, AIAA-2002-5966, International Powered Lift Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA, November 2002.Google Scholar
6. Tang, G., Yang, Z., Page, G.J. and McGuirk, J.J., Simulation of an Impinging Jet in Crossflow Using an LES Method, AIAA-2002-5939, Int. Powered Lift Conf, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
7. Li, Q., Page, G.J. and McGuirk, J.J., Large eddy simulation of twin impinging jets in cross-flow, Aeronaut J, March 2007, 111, pp 195206.Google Scholar
8. Childs, R. and Nixon, D., Unsteady three-dimensional simulations of a VTOL upwash fountain, AIAA-86-0202, 24th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, USA, January 1986.Google Scholar
9. Rizk, M. and Menon, S., An investigation of excitation effects on a row of impinging jets using large-eddy simulations, AIAA-88-0043, 26th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, USA, January 1988.Google Scholar
10. Page, G.J., Li, Q. and McGuirk, J.J., LES of impinging jet flows relevant to vertical kanding aircraft, AIAA-2005-5226, 23rd AIAA Computational Flow Dynamics Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 2005.Google Scholar
11. Richardson, G., Dawes, W. and Savill, M., Unsteady, moving mesh CFD simulation applied to Harrier VSTOL aircraft for hot-gas ingestion control analysis, Aeronaut J, March 2007, 111, pp 133144.Google Scholar
12. Crumpton, P.I., Moinier, P. and Giles, M.G., An unstructured algorithm for high Reynolds number flows on highly stretched grids, Tenth International Conference on Numerical Methods for Laminar and Turbulent Flow, 1997.Google Scholar
13. Tristanto, I. H., Li, Q., Page, G.J. and McGuirk, J.J., On the Effect of Convective Flux Formation for LES of Compressible Flows using Hybrid Unstructured Meshes, AIAA-2006-54940, 36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Francisco, California, USA, June 2006.Google Scholar
14. Moinier, P., Algorithm Developments for an Unstructured Viscous Flow Solver, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, 1998.Google Scholar
15. Ducros, F., Ferrand, V., Nicoud, F., Weber, C., Darracq, D., Gacheriu, C. and Poinsot, T., Large-eddy simulation of the shock/turbulence interaction, J Computational Physics, 1999, 152, pp 517549.Google Scholar
16. Nicoud, F. and Ducros, F., Sub grid-Sscale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 1999, 62, pp 183200.Google Scholar
17. Burgess, D., Crumpton, P. and Giles, M., A parallel framework for unstructured grid solvers, in: Programming Environments for Massively Parallel Distributed Systems, Decker, K.M. and Rehmann, R.M., (Eds) Birkhauser, 1994.Google Scholar
18. Hills, N., Achieving high parallel performance for an unstructured unsteady turbomachinery code, Aeronaut J, March 2007, 111, pp 185193.Google Scholar
19. Behrouzi, P. and McGuirk, J.J., Experimental data for CFD validation of the intake ingestion process in STOVL aircraft, Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 2000, 64, pp 233251.Google Scholar
20. Page, G.J., Li, Q. and McGuirk, J.J., Large eddy simulation of a Harrier aircraft at touch down, AIAA 2007-4294, 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Miami, Florida, USA, June 2007.Google Scholar