Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Ashford, D.M.
1997.
Space tourism-how soon will it happen?.
p.
567.
Article contents
The Spacecab Demonstrator project
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2016
Abstract
This paper describes a concept study of the Spacecab Demonstrator project, which is a small two seat aeroplane capable of routine “zoom-climbs” to space altitude. It is powered by a jet engine and a rocket motor. It would be the first sub-orbital spaceplane since the X-15 of thirty years ago. The study shows that Spacecab Demonstrator should be a simple robust development using existing technology. It would be used as a spaceplane technology testbed, as a reusable sounding rocket for space research and for specialised commercial applications. More importantly, it would serve as a pathfinder for the Spacecab orbital spaceplane, which is designed to be the first fully reusable launch vehicle. Spacecab uses existing engines and proven materials and is designed with provision for certification to airliner standards. Enlarged and mature developments of Spacecab would reduce the cost of sending people into space by three orders of magnitude compared with the cost today, and this could probably be achieved in about 15 years.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1995
References
1.
Ashford, D.M.
Project Spacecab — a minimum cost orbital taxi,
JBIS, January 1981. Presented at
17th European Space Symposium, London, June
1980.Google Scholar
2.
Schleicher, R.L.
Structural design of the
X-l5, Aeronaut J,
October 1963, 67,
(634), pp
618–636.Google Scholar
3.
Love, J.E.
and Young, W.R.
Operational experience of the X-l5 airplane as a
reusable vehicle system, SAE Paper 670394. Presented
to SAE Space Technology Conference, Palo Alto,
California, May 1967.Google Scholar
4. A preliminary feasibility study of
the Spacecab low-cost spaceplane and of the Spacecab
Demonstrator, Bristol Spaceplanes Limited Report
TR6, February 1994. Carried out under ESA Contract
No 10422/93/F/TB.Google Scholar
5. Round trip to orbit: human
spaceflight alternatives. Office of Technology
Assessment of the Congress of the United States.
OTA-ISC-419, August
1989.Google Scholar
6.
Deplante, H.
and Perrier, P.A.
A French concept for an aerospace transporter, SAE
paper 670388. Presented to SAE Space Technology
Conference, Palo Alto, California, May
1967.Google Scholar
7.
Ashford, D.M.
and Collins, P.Q.
The prospects for European aerospace
transporters, Aeronaut
J, Jan, Feb and March
1989.Google Scholar
8.
Cornog,
R. Economics of
rocket-propelled aeroplanes, Aero
Engineering Review, September
1956.Google Scholar
9.
Dornberger, W.R.
The rocket propelled commercial airliner, University
of Minnesota Institute of Technology, Research
Report No 135, November
1956.Google Scholar
10.
Eggers, A.J.
and Niece, S.E.
A comparative analysis of the performance of
long-range hypervelocity vehicles, NACA TN 4046,
October 1957.Google Scholar
11.
Koelle, H.H.
Assessing re-usable space
vehicles, Astronautics and
Aeronautics, June 1964,
69, (655), pp
448–458.Google Scholar
12.
Ashford, D.M.
Boost glide vehicles for long range transport,
Aeronaut J, July
1965.Google Scholar
13.
Pielke, R.A. Jr.
Space shuttle value — open to interpretation,
Aviation Week & Space
Technology, 26 July
1993.Google Scholar
14.
Meyers, J.,
Andrews, D.,
Bialla, P.,
Rozycki, D.,
Stenovec, J.
and Walsh, B.
Commercial space transportation results,
1AF-94-IAA.l.1.593. Presented at the 45th Congress
of the International Astronautical Federation, 9-14
October 1994, Jerusalem,
Israel.Google Scholar
15.
Collins, P.Q.,
Iwasaki, Y.,
Kanayama, H.
and Okazaki, M.
Potential demand for passenger travel to orbit.
Presented at ASCE Space ‘94,
Albuquerque.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by