Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T10:17:07.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Solution of the Hypersonic Wake behind a Wedge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

L Walitt  and
C Y Liu
L Walitt
Affiliation:
Applied Theory, Inc., Los Angeles, presently at Thermo-Mechanical Systems, Inc., Canoga Park, California
C Y Liu
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

A numerical method which solves the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations for plane, two-dimensional, compressible flow problems is presented. The method was applied to obtain the steady-state flow field about a flat-based 20° wedge at a free-stream Mach number of 6.05, a free-stream Reynolds number (based on the base height of the wedge) of 1.41 × 104, and a Prandtl number of 0.75. Two wedge surface temperature boundary conditions were investigated: adiabatic and isothermal walls. Convergence of the numerical solutions was demonstrated using two different finite-difference meshes. Numerical errors in the static pressure, velocity, and static temperature were generally less than 8 per cent in the wake of the body. Comparisons with experimental results and other independent theories were also made. For the isothermal wedge, calculated pressures on the surface of the body (including its base), static pressure profiles, pitot pressures profiles, and velocity profiles in the near wake were in agreement with corresponding experimental data. A comparison of static temperature profiles in the near wake of the isothermal wedge produced significant differences between numerical and experimental results near the wake shock. It was found that these differences could be explained in terms of uncertainties in the accuracy of the experimental measurements and thermal boundary conditions on the wedge surface. For the adiabatic wedge, the ramp boundary layer profiles and pressure distribution were in agreement with theoretical predictions coming from hypersonic interaction theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , November 1974 , pp. 313 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Trulio, J G, Walitt, L, Liu, C Y, Numerical calculations of separated flows. Symposium on Viscous Interaction Phenomena in Supersonic and Hypersonic Flow, University of Dayton Press, Dayton, Ohio, 1969.Google Scholar
2 Amsden, A A, Harlow, F H, Numerical calculation of supersonic wake flows. AIAA Journal, Vol 3, No 11, p 2081, 1965.Google Scholar
3 Scala, S M, Gordon, P, Solution of the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equation for the flow around a circular cylinder. AIAA Journal, Vol 6, No 5, p 815, 1968.Google Scholar
4 Allen, J S, Cheng, S I, Numerical solutions of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations for the laminar near wake. Physics of Fluids, Vol 13, No 1, p 37, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Moretti, G, Salas, M D, Numerical analysis of the viscous supersonic blunt body problem - Part I. Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, PIBAL Report 70-48, 1970.Google Scholar
6 Ohrenberger, J T, Baum, E, A theoretical model of the near wake of a slender body in supersonic flow. AIAA paper 70-792, AIAA 3rd Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Los Angeles, California, 1970.Google Scholar
7 Victoria, K J, Steiger, M H, Exact solution of the 2-D laminar near wake of a slender body in supersonic flow at high Reynolds number. Aerospace Corporation Report APP-0059(59990)-5, 1970.Google Scholar
8 Erdos, J, Zakkay, V, Inviscid solution of the steady, hypersonic near wake by a time-dependent method. AIAA Journal, Vol 9, No 7, p 1287, 1971.Google Scholar
9 Batt, R B, Kubota, T, Experimental investigation of laminar near wake behind a 20° Wedge at M∞ = 6. AIAA Journal, Vol 6, No 11, p 2077, 1968.Google Scholar
10 Crocco, L, A suggestion for the numerical solution of the steady Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, Vol 3, No 10, p 1824, 1965.Google Scholar
11 Trulio, J G, Walitt, L, Numerical calculations of viscous compressible fluid flow around a stationary cylinder. NASA CR-1465, 1970.Google Scholar
12 Walitt, L, Wilcox, D C, Liu, C Y, Numerical study of plume-induced flow separation. Paper presented at the Symposium on Applications of Computers to Fluid Dynamics Analysis and Design, Farmingdale, N Y, 1973.Google Scholar
13 Trulio, J G, Theory and structure of the AFTON codes. US Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Technical Report AFWL-TR-66-19, 1966.Google Scholar
14 von Neumann, J, Richtmyer, R D, A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks. Journal of Applied Physics, Vol 21, p 232, 1950.Google Scholar
15 Pai, S I, Viscous Flow Theory I - Laminar Flow, p 26, Van Nostrand, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
16 Walitt, L, Numerical studies of supersonic near-wakes. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1969.Google Scholar
17 Cheng, S I, Numerical integration of Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, Vol 8, No 12, p 2115,1970.Google Scholar
18 Hama, F R, Experimental investigation of wedge base pressure and lip shock. Jet Propulsion Laboratories, JPL Technical Report 32-1033, December 1966.Google Scholar
19 Chapman, D R, An analysis of base pressure at supersonic velocities and comparison with experiment. NACA TR 1051, 1951.Google Scholar