Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T17:34:55.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Shape-Factor Relationship for Turbulent Boundary Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

M.M.M. El Telbany ,
J. Niknejad  and
A.J. Reynolds
M.M.M. El Telbany*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex
J. Niknejad
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex
A.J. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex
*
*Permanent address: Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Elmataria, Cairo, Egypt.
Get access

Summary

Consideration is given to the relationship H1 = f(H) linking the common shape factor H and the mass-flow shape parameter H1 which is used in entrainment models of boundary-layer development. A formula suggested by Green et al is found to be most nearly consistent with the measurements presented. However, a more exact prediction of H1 is obtained by introducing a factor involving the Reynolds number based on the local momentum thickness θ; thus H1 = f(H, Reθ). Predictions obtained by incorporating the appropriately modified entrainment equation into the well-known method of Green et al prove not to give an improved representation of the development of boundary layers studied experimentally by the authors and others. It is concluded that the modified formula for H1 is primarily useful in giving an improved specification of the overall boundary layer thickness δ = θ(H1 + H), and hence of other features of the developing profile.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , May 1983 , pp. 147 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Coles, D. The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 1, pp 191-226, 1956 Google Scholar
2 Bradshaw, P. and Hellens, G.E. The N.P.L. 59 in. x 9 in. boundary-layer tunnel. N.P.L. Aero Rep. 1119, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, 1962 Google Scholar
3 Cebeci, T. Simpler methods in the calculation of turbulent flow, in Turbulence, Vol. 12, Topics in Applied Physics (ed. Bradshaw, P.), Springer, 1974 Google Scholar
4 Green, J.E., Weeks, D.J. and Brooman, J.W.F. Prediction of turbulent boundary layers and wakes in compressible flow by a lag-entrainment method. R. & M. No. 3791, Aero. Res. Council, London, 1973 Google Scholar
5 Head, M.R. Entrainment in the turbulent boundary layer. R. S M. No. 3152, Aero. Res. Council, London, 1958 Google Scholar
6 Kline, S.J. et al Computation of turbulent boundary layers. AFROSR-IFP-Stanford Conf. Proc, Stanford University, California, 1968 Google Scholar
7 Smith, P.D., Hastings, R.C. and Williams, B.R. Calculation and measurement of separated turbulent boundary layers. Presented at Euromech 148, Bochum, West Germany, 1981 Google Scholar
8 Schubauer, G.B. and Spangenberg, W.G. Forced mixing in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 8, pp 10-32, 1960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar