Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:30:03.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land and territory: the interface between two systems of land tenure, Murang'a District, Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Fiona Mackenzie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The objective of this paper is to examine the nature of the interface between two systems of land tenure in an area of smallholdings, Murang'a District, Central Province, Kenya. The first, the ng'undu system, evolved in the fertile, dissected plateau area east of the Nyandarua Range since the Kikuyu migrated there in the early seventeenth century (Muriuki, 1974: 62–82; Government of Kenya, 1929: 6); the second, a freehold system of individual land tenure, was introduced by the colonial state in the mid-1950s as a political instrument to counter the force of Mau Mau (Lamb, 1974; Leys, 1975). The latter system, it was intended, would replace the former, thereby laying the basis for an intensification of African agriculture which was also, under the Swynnerton Plan, to include production for the urban and export markets (Heyer, 1981; House and Killick, 1983). Commitment to this same principle continues to inform present agricultural policy (Government of Kenya, 1984a, Kenya Development Plan 1984–1988, p. 187; 1986,: 88).

Résumé

Terres et territoire: la coexistence entre deux systemes de bail foncier, region de Murang'a, Kenya

Il est de plus en plus prouvé d'après l'etude d'une région de petite exploitation agricole au Kenya que la ‘réforme fonciaire’ effectuée au cours des années 50 et 60 qui comprenait la consolidation et l'enregistrement des parcelles de terre individuelles n'a pas complètement supplanté l'ancien système ng'undu de bail foncier. Là où les deux systèmes coexistent, la fluidité des limites rend les droits fonciers incertains. Des références à une série de cas historiques permettent d'examiner la nature des rapports et comment ils affectent les droits fonciers des femmes et des hommes. On soutient que les procédés mis en oeuvre aux endroits de coexistence, bien qu'ils défavorisent généralement les femmes, ont créé une région où les femmes autant que les hommes sont en droit de contester leurs droits fonciers.

Type
Access, control and use of resources in African agriculture
Information
Africa , Volume 59 , Issue 1: Access, control and use of resources in African Agriculture , January 1989 , pp. 91 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clark, C. M. 1980. ‘Land and food, women and power, in nineteenth century Kikuyu’, Africa, 50 (5): 357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. M. 1954. Reports on the Kikuyu, Fort Hall District, Miscellaneous Correspondence DC/FH 31, Kenya National Archives.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. F. 1986. Decolonisation and the State in Kenya. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya. 1926, 1943, 1944, 1949, 1958, 1960. Fort Hall District Annual Reports.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya 1929. Native Land Tenure in Kikuyu Province, Report of Committee and Appendix (Chairman Maxwell, G. V.). Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya 1938. Central Province Annual Report.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya 1957. Fort Hall District Handing-Over Report.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya 1968. Economic Survey of Central Province (ESCP) 1963–64, Statistics Division, Ministry of Economic Planning and Development. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya 1970. Statistical Abstract, Central Bureau of Statistics. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya 1984a. Kenya Development Plan 1984–88. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya 1984b. Murang'a District Development Plan 1984–1988. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya 1986. Economic Management for Renewed Growth, Sessional Paper no. 1. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Haugerud, A. 1983. ‘The consequences of land tenure reform among smallholders in the Kenya Highlands’, Rural Africana, 15/16: 65–89.Google Scholar
Heyer, J. 1981. ‘Agricultural development policy in Kenya from the colonial period to 1975’, in Heyer, J., Roberts, P. and Williams, G. (eds.), Rural Development in Tropical Africa, pp. 90–120. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homan, F. D. 1962. ‘Consolidation, enclosure and registration of title in Kenya’, Journal of Local Administration Overseas, 1: 4–14.Google Scholar
Homan, F. D. 1963. ‘Succession to registered land in the African areas of Kenya’, Journal of Local Administration Overseas, 1: 49–54.Google Scholar
Hoorweg, J., Niemeijer, R., and van Steenbergen, W. 1983. Nutrition Survey in Murang'a District, Kenya, Part I: Relations between ecology, economic and social conditions and nutritional state of preschool children, Research Report No. 19/1983. Leiden: African Studies Centre.Google Scholar
House, W. J., and Killick, T. 1983. ‘Social justice and development in Kenya's rural economy’, in Ghai, D. and Radwan, S. (eds.), Agrarian Policies and Rural Poverty in Africa, pp. 31–69. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Kanogo, T. 1987. Squatters and the Roots of Mau Mau 1905–1963. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Kenya Land Commission. 1934. Kenya Land Commission: evidence and memoranda. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Kenyatta, J. 1938. Facing Mount Kenya: the traditional life of the Kikuyu, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Kershaw, G. 1976. ‘The changing roles of men and women in the Kikuyu family by socioeconomic strata’, Rural Africana, 29: 173–94.Google Scholar
Kitching, G. 1980. Class and Economic Change in Kenya: the making of an African petite-bourgeoisie. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, G. 1974. Peasant Politics. Lewes, Sussex: Friedmann.Google Scholar
Lambert, H. E., and Harris, Wyn. 1945. The Kikuyu Lands. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Leakey, L. S. B. 1977. The Southern Kikuyu before 1903, Vols. 1–3. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leo, C. 1984. Land and Class in Kenya. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Leys, C. 1975. Underdevelopment in Kenya: the political economy of neo-colonialism 1964–1971. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. R. L. (1897) 1973. Soldiering and Surveying in British East Africa 1891–1894. Folkestone: Dawsons of Pall Mall.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, F. 1986a. ‘Land and Labour: women and men in agricultural change, Murang'a District, Kenya, 1880–1984’, PhD Thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, F. 1986b. ‘Local initiative and national policy: gender and agricultural change in Murang'a District, Kenya’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 20 (3): 377–401.Google Scholar
Middleton, J., and Kershaw, G. 1965. ‘The central tribes of the northeastern Bantu’, in Forde, D. (ed.), Ethnographic Survey of Africa, Part V. London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
Murang'a District Agricultural History (MDAH). ‘Case studies collected by Mackenzie, F.’. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Muriuki, G. 1974. A History of-ihe Kikuyu 1500–1900. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Obbo, C. 1976. ‘Dominant male ideology and female options: three East African case studies’, Africa, 46: 371–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, D. 1977. ‘Female husbands in Southern Bantu Societies’, in Schlegel, A. (ed.), Sexual Stratification: a cross-cultural view, pp. 109–26. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Okeyo, A. P. 1980. ‘Daughters of the lakes and rivers: colonisation and the land rights of Luo women’, in Etienne, M. and Leacock, E. (eds.), Women and Colonisation, pp. 186–213. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Okoth-Ogendo, H. W. O. 1986. ‘Some issues of theory in the study of tenure relations in African agriculture’, paper presented at the African Studies Association Conference, 30 October-2 November, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Sacks, K. 1982. Sisters and Wives: the past and future of sexual equality. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smock, A. 1977. Women's Education and Roles in Kenya, Working Paper No. 316. Institute for Development Studies, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
Sorrenson, M. P. K. 1967. Land Reform in Kikuyu Country. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. R. F. 1966. ‘Fort Hall District, Kenya: a geographical consideration of the problems and potential of a developing area’, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. 1885. Through Masailand: a journey of exploration among the snowclad volcanic mountains and strange tribes of Eastern Equatorial Africa. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rovington.Google Scholar
von Hohnel, L. 1894. Discovery of Lakes Rudolf and Stefanie: a narrative of Count Samuel Teleki's exploring and hunting expedition in Eastern Equatorial Africa in 1887 and 1888. London: Longman's Green.Google Scholar
White, L. 1983. ‘A colonial state and an African petty bourgeoisie: prostitution, property, and class struggle in Nairobi, 1936–1940’, in Cooper, F. (ed.), Struggle for the City: migrant labor, capital and the state in urban Africa, pp. 167–94. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar