Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T06:24:18.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polly Hill, Dry grain farming families: Hausaland (Nigeria) and Karnataka (India) compared, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 338 pp., £25.00 hard covers, £9.95 paperback.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Barbara Harriss
Barbara Harriss
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews of Books
Information
Africa , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 84 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 ICRISAT. 1980. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Socioeconomic Constraints to Development of Semi Arid Tropical Agriculture, 1979. Hyderabad: ICRISAT.Google Scholar

2 There are over thirty relevant papers in the series Economics Program Working Papers and Economics Program Occasional Papers.

3 For example, see Rastogi, B. K., and Reddy, Y. V. R. 1982. A Study on Farm Structures in Dry Farming Areas. ICAR/Delhi; AICRPDA/Hyderabad.Google Scholar

4 Nadkarni, M. V. 1976. ‘Tenants from the dominant class: a developing contradiction in land reforms,’ Economic and Political Weekly 11, 52, pp. A137–A146.Google Scholar

5 Nadkarni, M. V. 1980. Marketable Surplus and Market Dependence in a Millet Region. Delhi: Allied.Google Scholar

6 Nadkarni, M. V. 1979. ‘Marketable surplus, market dependence and economic development,’ Social Scientist 83, pp. 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 See the critique in Harriss, J. 1982. Capitalism and Peasant Farming, Bombay, O.U.P.Google Scholar, and the results there and also in Harriss, B. 1982. ‘Exchange relations and Poverty in Dryland Agriculture,’ Report to ESCOR of the Overseas Development Administration, London.Google Scholar

8 Jodha, N. S. 1969. ‘Drought and scarcity in Rajasthan desert: some basic issues,’ Economic and Political Weekly 4, 16Google Scholar; id., 1977a. ‘Role of Credit in Farmers' Adjustment against Risk in Arid and Semi-arid Areas of India,’ Economics Program, ICRISAT, Hyderabad; id., 1977b. ‘Effectiveness of Fanners' Adjustment to Risk,’ Economics Program, ICRISAT, Hyderabad.

9 See Gore, C. 1978. ‘The terms of trade of food producers as a mechanism of rural differentiation,’ Bulletin of the Institute of Development Studies, pp. 20—4Google Scholar; and Rahman, A. 1981. ‘Variations in terms of exchange and their impact on farm households in Bangladesh,’ Journal of Development Studies, pp. 317–35.Google Scholar