Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T11:53:21.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Your terroir and my ‘action space’: implications of differentiation, mobility and diversification for the approche terroir in Sahelian West Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Thomas Painter ,
James Sumberg  and
Thomas Price
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article addresses the question of whether the aménagement/gestion de terroir approach, as it is currently being promoted by government, and. development organisations in the French-speaking countries of Sahelian West Africa, is compatible with the realties that agro-pastoralists in those countries face day-to-day. It is particularly concerned with three characteristics of life in the Sahel that have important implications for how agrarian populations manage resources, and whether the terroir approach, which, aims ostensibly to increase the effectiveness of local-level natural resource management, addresses or fails to address these characteristics. First, the Sahel is characterised by considerable agro-ecological diversity and socio-economic differentiation. Second, Sahelan populations are often very mobile as a result, of their efforts to deal with changing opportunities and constraints that affect their pursuit of a livelihood. And, third, Sahelian populations commonly use multiple strategies for risk management, including, but. certainly not limited to, those which focus on the terroir villageois.

In exploring; this question the term ‘action space’ Is used to describe the geographical and temporal distribution of the combination of more or Jess viable options that, smallholder agriculturalists and pastoralists exploit, as they pursue their livelihood. The concept of action space is more inclusive and more flexible than the concept of terroir villageois; and, as such, offers greater promise for understanding and addressing empirical realities in. the Sahel.

Résumé

Cet article cherche à savoir si l'approche ‘aménagement/gestion de terroir’, comme elle est à présent encouragée par le gouvernement et les organismes de développement dans les pays francophones de l'Afrique de l'Ouest sahélienne, est compatible avec les réalites que les agro-pastoralistes de ces pays font face au jour le jour. Cet article s'intéresse particulièrement à trois caractéristiques de la vie dans le Sahel qui ont des implications importantes pour la manière dont les populations agraires gèrent J leurs ressources, et cherche à déterminer si l'approche du terroir, qui est censée avoir pour but d'augmenter l'efficacité de la gestion locale des ressources naturelles, adresse ou bien ne réussit pas à adresser ces caractéristiques. Premièrement, le Sahel est caractérisé par une diversité agro-écologique et une différentiation socioéconomique considérable. Deuxièmement, les populations sahéliennes sont souvent très mobiles dû à leurs efforts pour venir à bout des occasions opportunes et contraintes qui affectent la recherche de leur gagne-pain. Et troisièmement, les populations du Sahel utilisent communément des stratégies multiples pour faire face aux risques, y compris, mais certainement pas exclusivement, celles qui sont concentrées sur le terroir villageois.

En explorant cette question le terme ‘action espace’ est utilisé pour décrire la distribution géographique et temporelle de la combination d'options plus ou moins viables que les petits agriculturalistes et pastoralistes exploitent tandis qu'ils continuent à chercher à gagner leur vie. Le concept d'action space est plus inclus et plus flexible que le concept de terroir villageois et en tant que tel offre une espérance plus grande pour comprendre et adresser les réalités empiriques du Sahel.

Type
The ‘local factor’ in economic and political analysis
Information
Africa , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , October 1994 , pp. 447 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, S. (ed.). 1974. Modern Migration in Western Africa. London: Oxford University Press, for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Barrier, C. 1989. Evaluation retrospective du Projet de développement rural integré de Maradi (Niger). Paris: Caisse Central de Coopération Economique.Google Scholar
Barrier, C. 1990. ‘Developpement rural en Afrique de l'Ouest soudano-sahelienne: premier bilan sur l'approche gestion de terroirs villageoise’, Cahiers de la Recherche Developpement 25, 33–42.Google Scholar
Behnke, R. H., Scoones, I., and Kerven, C. (eds.). 1993. Range Ecology at Disequilibrium. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 1989. ‘Social institutions and access to resources’, Africa 59 (1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, S. 1993. No Condition is Permanent: the social dynamics of agrarian change in sub-Saharan Africa. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bonnet, Bernard. 1990; ‘Elevage et gestion de terroirs en zone soudanienne’, Cahiers de la Recherche Développement 25, 43–67.Google Scholar
Sahel, Club du. 1989. Expériences dune concertation: Rapport final de la rencontre régionale de Ségou sur la gestion des terroirs sahéliens, 21-25 mai 1989. Doc. SAHEL D(89)335. Paris: Club du Sahel-OCDE/CILSS.Google Scholar
Critchley, Will. 1991. Looking after our Land: new approaches to soil and water conservation in dryland Africa. Oxford: Oxfam Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, C. L. 1989. ‘The changing economic context of mixed farming in savanna West Africa: a conceptual framework applied to Burkina Faso’, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 28 (3/4), 351–64.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. E., and Swift, D. M. 1988. ‘Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: alternate paradigms and implications for development’, Journal of Range Management 41, 450–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, Richard W., and Chasin, Barbara H. 1980. Seeds of Famine: ecological destruction and the development dilemma in the West African Sahel. Montclair, N.J.: Allanheld Osmun.Google Scholar
Gorse, Jean E., and Steeds, David R. 1987. Desertification in the Sahelian and Sudanian Zones of West Africa. World Bank Technical Paper No. 61. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Gregory, Joel, and Piché, Victor. 1978. ‘African migration and peripheral capitalism’, African Perspectives 1, 37–50.Google Scholar
Gregory, Joel, 1983. ‘African return migration: past, present and future’, Contemporary Marxism 7, 169–83.Google Scholar
Hill, Polly. 1982. Dry Grain Farming Families. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Michael M. 1979. The Sociology of Pastoralism and African Livestock Projects. AID Program Evaluation Discussion Paper No. 6. Washington D.C.: USAID.Google Scholar
Imbs, François. 1987. Kumtaabo: une collectivité rurale mossi et son rapport à l'espace (Burkina Faso). Atlas des Structures Agraires au Sud du Sahara No. 121. Paris: ORSTOM.Google Scholar
Painter, Thomas M. 1985. ‘Peasant Migrations and Rural Transformations in Niger: a study of incorporation within a West African capitalist regional economy, c. 1875 to c. 1982’. Ph.D. dissertation, Binghamton N.Y.: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Painter, Thomas M. 1986. ‘In search of the peasant connection: spontaneous cooperation, introduced cooperatives, and agricultural development in southwestern Niger’, in Horowitz, Michael M. and Painter, Thomas M. (eds.), Anthropology and Rural Development in West Africa. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Painter, Thomas M. 1987. ‘Bringing land back in: changing strategies to improve agricultural production in the West African Sahel’, in Little, Peter D. and Horowitz, Michael M. (eds.), Lands at Risk in the Third World: local level perspectives. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Painter, Thomas M. 1991. Approaches to Improving the Use of Natural Resources for Agriculture in Sahelian West Africa: a sociological analysis of the ‘amenagement/gestion de terroirs villageois’ approach and its implications for non-governmental organizations. Agriculture and Natural Resources Technical Report Series No. 3. New York: CARE.Google Scholar
Painter, Thomas M. 1992. Migration and AIDS in West Africa: a study of migrants from Niger and Mali to Cote dlvoire: socio-economic context, features of their sexual comportment, and implications for AIDS prevention initiatives. CARE Primary Health Care Publication Series. New York: CARE.Google Scholar
Painter, Thomas M. 1993. ‘Situating User-based Governance: people's livelihood strategies and natural resource management in West Africa’. Paper presented at the Seminar on Improved Natural Resource Management: Role of the State versus that of the Local Community. Programme on Political and Cultural Institutions in Development, International Development Studies, Roskilde University, Jyllinge, Denmark, 1-4 November.Google Scholar
Pelissier, P., and Sautter, G. 1970. ‘Bilan et perspectives d'une recherche sur les terroirs africains et malgaches (1962-69)’, Etudes Rurales 37-9, 7–45.Google Scholar
Raynaut, Claude, with J. Koechlin, P. Brasset, C. Cheung and M. Stigliano. 1988. Le Développement rural de la region au village: analyser et comprendre la diversite. Projet de Developpement Rural de Maradi. Bordeaux: GRID.Google Scholar
Reardon, T., Fall, A. A., Kelly, V., Delgado, C., Matlon, P., Hopkins, J., and Badiane, O. Forthcoming. ‘Agriculture-led income diversification in the West African semi-arid tropics: nature, distribution, and importance of production-linkage activities’, in Wangwe, S. and Drabek, A. G. (eds.), African Economic Issues. Nairobi: African Economic Research Consortium.Google Scholar
Répubtique du Niger. 1984. Programme Intérimaire de Consolidation, 1984-85. Niamey: Ministere du Plan.Google Scholar
Rochette, Réne Marceau. 1985. Stratégic de kitte contre la désertification au sahel. Synthese du siminaire regional sur la désertification au sahel, Nouakchott, 29 octobre-4 novembre 1984. Doc. SAHEL CR(85)48. Paris: Club du Sahel-OCDE/CILSS.Google Scholar
Rochette, Réne Marceau. 1989. Le sakel en lutte contre la désertification: lecons d'expériences, Eschborn: Deutsche Gesclschaft für Technische Zusammerarbeit, Comité Inter-Etats de Lutte contre la Séeheresse au Sahel, Programme Allemand CILSS.Google Scholar
Sautter, Gilles. 1962. ‘A propos de quelques terroirs d'Afrique occidentale: essai eomparatif’, Etudes Rurales 4, 24–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sautter, Gilles. 1993. Parcours d'un géograpke: despaysagesauxethnies, de la brousse à la ville, de l'Afrique am monde. Paris: Editions Arguments.Google Scholar
Tiffen, Mary, and Mortimore, Michael. 1994. More People, Less Erosion: environmental recovery in Kenya. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Van dec Valk-van Ginneken, P. H. M. 1981. Land Use Conflicts in the Zangon Katab District, a study of court cases. ILCA Sub-humid Programme, Working Document 2. Kaduna: International Livestock Centre for Africa.Google Scholar
Westoby, M., Walter, B., and Noy-Mler, I. 1989. ‘Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium’. Journal of Range Management 42 (4), 266–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 1978. Rural Development Projects: a. retrospective view of Bank experience in subsaharan Africa. Report No. 2242. Washington D.C.: World. Bank. Operations Evaluation Department.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1992, World Development Report: development and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar