Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T13:54:51.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘There is no Stranger to Marriage Here!’: Muslim Women and Divorce in Rural Zanzibar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Zanzibar, many cases in rural Islamic courts involve disputes about whether or not a divorce has taken place outside of court. Zanzibari men have the right to divorce their wives unilaterally through repudiation; and, because many such divorces take place out of the wife's presence, women interpret certain structural events associated with divorce as divorce even when there is no evidence of lawful repudiation. By going to court, women want to legitimize the events of divorce with a receipt of registered divorce. Although the Islamic judge will not validate alleged divorces without proof of repudiation, he does not dismiss the cases as simple misunderstandings. Rather, he stresses the preservation of the marriage through reframing the cases as disputes about marital rights and obligations. Women acknowledge this shift and move to assert their rights to request better maintenance or a court-ordered divorce.

Résumé

Dans les tribunaux islamiques ruraux de Zanzibar, un grand nombre d'affaires portent sur la question de savoir si un divorce a eu lieu ou non en dehors du tribunal. Les Zanzibariens ont le droit de divorcer de leurs épouses unilatéralement par répudiation et, un grand nombre de ces divorces étant prononcés en l'absence de l'épouse, les femmes interprètent comme un divorce certains événements structurels associés au divorce, même lorsqu'il n'existe aucune preuve de répudiation légitime. En se rendant au tribunal, les femmes demandent à légaliser les événements de divorce par un document d'attestation de divorce. Si le juge islamique ne valide pas les divorces prétendus sans preuve de répudiation, il ne les rejette pas pour autant en les qualifiant de simples malentendus. Au lieu de cela, il souligne l'importance de préserver le mariage en requalifiant les litiges de différends liés aux droits et obligations maritaux. Les femmes en prennent acte et poussent pour faire valoir leurs droits à une meilleure pension alimentaire ou à un divorce prononcé par ordonnance du tribunal.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2005

References

Anderson, J. N. D. 1970. Islamic Law in Africa. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Antoun, R. 1990. ‘Litigant strategies in an Islamic court in Jordan’, in Dwyer, D. (ed.), Law and Islam in the Middle East. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Bowen, J. R. 1998. ‘Law and social norms in the comparative study of Islam’, American Anthropologist 100 (4): 1034–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, P. 1975. Choice and Constraint in Swahili Community. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, P. 1984. ‘Cognatic descent, Islamic law and women's property on the East African coast’ in Hirschon, R. (ed.), Women and Property, Women as Property. New York: St. Martin s Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, P. 1995. ‘“Law” and “custom”: marital disputes on Northern Mafia Island, Tanzania’, in Caplan, P. (ed.), Understanding Disputes: the politics of argument. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Caplan, P. 1997. African Voice, African Lives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caplan, P. 2000 ‘Monogamy, polygyny, or the single state?: changes in marriage patterns in a Tanzanian coastal village, 1965–1994’, in Creighton, C. and Omari, C. K. (eds), Gender, Family and Work in Tanzania. Burlington, VT and Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dwyer, D. 1990. Law and Islam in the Middle East. New York: Begin and Garvey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, C. 1984. ‘Waungwana and Wanawake: Muslim ethnicity and sexual segregation in coastal Kenya, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 5: 91112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, J. 1982. Women in Muslim Family Law. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. 1997. In the Shadow of Marriage: gender and justice in an African community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haeri, S. 1989. Law of Desire. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, S. 1994. ‘Kadhi's courts as complex sites of resistance: the state, Islam and gender in postcolonial Kenya’, in Hirsch, S. and Lazarus-Black, M. (eds), Contested States: law, hegemony and resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirsch, S. 1998. Pronouncing and Persevering: gender and the discourse of disputing in an African Islamic court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, S. and Lazarus-Black, M. (eds). 1994. Contested States: law, hegemony and resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirschfield, L. A. 2002. ‘Why don't anthropologists like children?’ American Anthropologist 104 (2): 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. E. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: legal consciousness among working class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, J. 1992. The World of the Swahili: an African mercantile civilization. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Mir-Hosseini, Z. 2000. Marriage on Trial: a study of Islamic family law; Iran and Morocco compared. London and New York: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Montresor, A. et al. 2001. ‘School enrolment in Zanzibar linked to children's age and helminth infections’, Tropical Medicine and International Health 6 (3): 227–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purpura, A. 1999. ‘Knowledge and agency: the social relations of Islamic expertise in Zanzibar town’. Ph.D. dissertation. New York: City University of New York.Google Scholar
Sonbol, A. 2003. Women of Jordan: Islam, labor and the law. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Stiles, E. 2002. ‘A kadhi in his court: marriage, divorce and the islamic legal tradition in Zanzibar’. Ph.D. dissertation. St Louis: Washington University.Google Scholar
Strobel, M. 1979. Muslim Women in Mombasa, 1890–1975. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Swartz, M. 1991. The Way the World Is: cultural relations and social processes among the Mombasa Swahili. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurth, A. 1995. ‘A Sana'a Court: the family and the ability to negotiate’, Islamic Law and Society 2 (3): 320–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar