No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Conservative Africanists and African Studies: A Reply to Gann’s Reponse to Ralston
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 August 2021
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0047160700501139/resource/name/firstPage-S0047160700501139a.jpg)
- Type
- Insight: Africanists and Conservatives
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © African Studies Association 1990
References
Notes
1. Gann, L. H., “The State of Scholarship. African Studies: A Dissident’s View,” Academic Questions 2, 2, Spring 1989, p. 85 Google Scholar.
2. Particularly Gann, L. H. and Duignan, Peter, eds., Colonialism in Africa 1870-1960, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1969-75, 5 volumesGoogle Scholar; Gann, L.H. and Duignan, Peter, eds., African Proconsuls: European Governors of Africa, New York, Free Press, 1978 Google Scholar; and their jointly written The Ruhrs of German Africa 1870-1914, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1978; The Rulers of Belgian Africa, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1979; and The Rulers of British Africa, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1975.
3. For example, Gann, L.H., Neo-colonialism, Imperialist and the “New Class,” Menlo Park, California, Institute for Humane Studies, 1975 Google Scholar; Gann, L. H. and Duignan, Peter, South Africa: War, Revolution, or Peace?, Stanford, Hoover Institution Press, 1978 Google Scholar; Africa South of the Sahara: The Challenge to Western Security, Stanford, Hoover Institution Press, 1981; and Africa between East and West,> Cape Town, Tafelberg Publishers, 1983.