Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:28:10.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preface: Democratic Transition in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

Get access

Extract

Since 1989, the “winds of change” have swept throughout Africa, signaling the dawn of a new era, variously referred to as the “second independence,” or the “Springtime of Africa.” After three decades of authoritarian one- (or no) party rule characterized by political repression, human rights abuses, economic mismanagement, nepotism and corruption, democracy is spreading like bushfire throughout Africa. In 1992 an evaluation of the Carter Center’s African Governance Program, noted that 9 African countries may be described as “democratic,” 4 are under a “directed democracy” regime, and 31 are in transition to democracy, with various degrees of commitment. Popular struggles for democracy in Africa are not new, they have been here since independence. But recent changes in the structure of the international system (notably successful popular struggles for democracy in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union) have created a generally favorable and supportive environment for their development and maturation.

Type
FOCUS: Toward a New African Political Order: African Perspectives on Democratization Processes, Regional Conflict Management
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. “The concept of ‘second independence’ was developed, not by social scientists, but by ordinary people in the Kwilu region of western Zaire. For the people, independence was meaningless without a better standard of living, greater civil liberties, and the promise of a better life for their children. Instead of making these promised benefits available to the masses, the politicians who inherited state power from the Belgians lived in much greater luxury than most of their European predecessors and used violence and arbitrary force against the people. For the latter, the first or nominal independence had failed.” ( Nzongola-Ntalaja, Georges, Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Africa, London, Zed Books, 1987, p. 92)Google Scholar.

2. Africa Demos, vol. 2, no. 2, February 1992, pp. 1, 11.

3. Michael Clough, “Africa Finds Reasons to Hope for Democracy’s Future,” The New York Times, March 22, 1992.

4. Lemarchand, René, “Africa’s Troubled Transitions,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 3, no. 4, October, 1992, pp. 98100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Salim, Salim Ahmed, “Africa and the New Global Order; A New Agenda for the OAU,” Interview with Novicki, Margaret A., Africa Report, vol. 37, no. 3, May-June, 1992, pp. 11, 36-39Google Scholar.