Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T08:17:51.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civil Society, the Challenge to the Authoritarian State, and the Consolidation of Democracy in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

Judith-Ann Walker
Get access

Extract

The victory for democracy resulting from General Olusegun Obasanjo’s election in February 1999 is as hollow as it is contrived. For many analysts and political aspirants, Obasanjo’s victory is not a triumph for democracy but merely a eulogy to formal military rule. Obasanjo is viewed as the “ordained” military successor with more continuity to the tradition of authoritarian rule than to genuine democracy. His known autocratic leadership style and his less-than-progressive stance on the media and women make him difficult to accept as a champion of democracy. Furthermore, the legality of his victory is challenged by his alleged contravention of the qualification regulations of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), a factor that has led his opponent to contest the election results.

Given this imperfect situation, this article considers how Nigeria can build on the gains of the transition and consolidate democracy. The evidence from the new wave of democracy sweeping through the developing world suggests that “democracy makes sense” when civil organizations are prepared to challenge the right of autocratic regimes to rule.

Type
Part 1
Information
African Issues , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 54 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Odenyi, Paul, “The Politics of Falae’s Petition,” The Source 5, no. 24 (March 29, 1999): 8–11 Google Scholar.

2. Bayart, Jean Francois, “Civil Society in Africa,” in Political Domination in Africa, ed., Chabal, Patrick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 111 Google Scholar.

3. Fisher, J., “Is the Iron Law of Oligarchy Rusting Away in the Third World?” World Development 22, no. 2 (1994): 129–143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. Mustapha, R.A., “When Will Independence End: Democratization and Civil Society in Rural Africa,” in Democratization in the Third World: Concrete Cases in Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives, eds., Rudebeck, L. and Tornquist, O. (Seminar for Development Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden, 1996), 231–241 Google Scholar.

5. Hyden, Goran, “Building Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium,” in Beyond the Prince and Merchant: Citizen Participation and the Rise of Civil Society, ed., Burbidge, J. (Institute of Cultural Affairs International, Brussels, 1998), 17–46 Google Scholar.

6. Ake, Claude, Democratization of Disempowerment in Africa, CASS Occasional Monograph no. 1 (Lagos: Malthouse Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

7. Hyden, “Building Civil Society,” 33 and 41; Bangura, Y., “New Directions in State Reforms and Civil Society” (paper presented at the Conference on Civil Society, Authoritarianism, and Globalization: Issues of Theory and Third World Experiences, Stockholm University, September 1998)Google Scholar.

8. Bayart, “Civil Society in Africa”; Bratton, Michael, “Beyond the State: Civil Society and Associational Life in Africa,” World Politics 41, no. 3 (1989): 407–430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9. Buijtenhuijs, R. and Thiriot, C., Democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1992-1995 (Leiden, The Netherlands: African Studies Center, 1995)Google Scholar.

10. Hashim, Y. and Walker, J., “Men, Women, and Leadership in a Nigerian NGDO: The Case of Women in Nigeria” (paper presented at the International Society for Third Sector Research, Bi-Annual Conference, Mexico City, 1997)Google Scholar.

11. International Civil Society and Governance Program (ICSAG) mapping exercise of civil society in Nigeria (Center for Research and Documentation, 1999); USAID NGO assessment reports for 1996, 1997, and 1998-1999.

12. USAID NGO assessment report for 1998.