Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T15:28:12.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors, Journals and Scholarly Communication in Library and Information Science: The Missing Links in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2022

Get access

Extract

Research is an important component of any discipline. This is because through research the frontiers of knowledge are extended. It provides the stimulus for the growth of a profession. For a profession to develop, research must be vigorously pursued and the findings regularly disseminated. The case of the library and information science (LIS) profession is unique, given the on-going debate as to whether LIS is a profession or a discipline or both. In such a situation it is expected that the research process will be complex. What is clear, however, is that LIS is a multidisciplinary profession that draws from library science, information science, publishing, computer science, communication science, engineering, management, etc. There is no doubt that it is a multifarious profession that needs to be constantly researched.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Revised version of the keynote address presented at the Training Course on Research and Writing Skills for LIS Authors in Nigeria at Lady Bank Anthony Hall, University of Ibadan, 7 October 2002.

References

Afolabi, M.O. (1976). The literature of librarianship in Nigeria, 1950-1973: publication citation and bibliographic control, Nigerian libraries, 12,179-191.Google Scholar
Aina, L.O. (1991). Directions of the information professions in Africa as reflected in the literature, International library review, 23, 365-380.10.1016/0020-7837(91)90007-MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aina, L.O. (2002). An empirical analysis of LIS literature in Nigeria. Unpublished report. 12p.Google Scholar
Aina, L.O. & Mabawonku, I.M. (1996). Management of a scholarly journal in Africa: a success story, African journal of library, archives and information science, 8, 63-83.Google Scholar
Aina, L.O. & Mabawonku, I.M. (1998). Manuscripts submitted for publication in the information profession in Africa: a comparative analysis of characteristics of rejected and accepted papers, Journal of documentation, 54, 250-255.Google Scholar
Alemna, A.A. & Badu, E.E. (1994). The nature and trends in research and journal literature in English speaking Africa, International information and library review, 26,19-30.10.1080/10572317.1994.10762328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, B. & Mckenzie, G. (1992). The trajectory of rejection, Journal of documentation, 48, 310-317.10.1108/eb026900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ifidon, S.E. (1994). Overview of the state of Nigerian journal publishing, pp. 19-26 in Survival under adverse conditions: proceedings of the African Library Science Journals Workshop, ed. Wise, Michael. The Hague, IFLA.Google Scholar
Meadows, J. (1997). Scholarly communication, pp. 409-410 in International encyclopaedia of information and library science, ed. Feather, J. & Sturges, P. London,Routledge.Google Scholar
Nzotta, B.C. (1994). Journal publishing in Nigeria: an editor's view, pp. 27-32 in Survival under adverse conditions: proceedings of the African Library Science Journals Workshop, ed. Wise, Michael. The Hague, IFLA.Google Scholar
Okiy, Rose B. (2002). A comparative analysis of the characteristics of authors in four librarianship journals in Nigeria, African journal of library, archives and information science. (In press.)Google Scholar
Raptis, P. (1992). Authorship characteristics in five international library science journals, Libri 42, 35-52.10.1515/libr.1992.42.1.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzun, Ali (2002). LIS research in developing countries and Eastern European countries: a brief bibliometric perspective, International information and library review, 34, 21-33.Google Scholar