Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T19:19:30.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Archivist, the Scholar and the Possibilities of Decolonising Archives in Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2022

Livingstone Muchefa*
Affiliation:
E-mail: muchefa@gmail.com
Get access

Extract

The well-worn routes of colonial history leading to London, Paris, Lisbon, and elsewhere may remain fruitful for historians of the post-colonial period. Since former colonial powers remained involved, or at least interested, in what was going on in their former colonies, intelligence reports and diplomatic materials from the last fifty years may be of value to social scientists of the present. Historians also have turned to records from the United States, the former USSR, and other states with extensive involvement in African politics. The archives of humanitarian groups, non-governmental organizations, newspapers, and other institutions also contain materials produced by African governments. Some intentionally gathered materials, while others accreted them indirectly over the course of their work. (Samuel Fury Childs Daly 2017).

Although Daly's quotation was focused on the post-independence period in Biafra, the sentiments resonate precisely with circumstances elsewhere in understanding African history through the archives.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Research & Documentation 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The paper that was presented at SCOLMA 2019 General Conference, Edinburgh was originally titled, “The archivist and the scholar: re-interpretation and re-location of colonial archives”.

References

Abdoulahi, A. 2014. The Timbuktu Manuscripts Project and the contribution of UNESCO to its achievement.Google Scholar
Bishi, G. 2015. The colonial archive and contemporary chieftainship claims: the case of Zimbabwe, 1935 to 2014. Master of Arts Thesis, University of Free State.Google Scholar
Daly, Samuel, Fury Childs. 2017 Archival research in Africa, African affairs, 116, Issue 463, 2017, pp. 311-320Google Scholar
Elkins, E. 2005. Imperial reckoning: the untold story of Britain's gulag in Kenya. New York, Holt.Google Scholar
Freeman, E.T. 1984. In the eye of the beholder: archives administration from the user's point of view, American archivist, 47(2), pp.111-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garaba, F. 2011. Provenance, identification, restitution and management of the liberation struggle heritage in the ESARBICA Region', Journal of the Society of South African Archivists, 44, pp.26-43Google Scholar
Jeater, D. 2001. Speaking like a native: vernacular languages and the state in Southern Rhodesia, 1890-1935, Journal of African history, 42(3) pp.449-468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, I.J. 1987. Zimbabwean political materials published in exile 1959-1980: a bibliography. Harare, National Archives of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Jump, M. 2012. The role of archives in the movement for the recovery of historical memory in Spain. La Rioja: a regional case study, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 33(2), pp. 149-166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, E. 2000. We are what we collect, we collect what we are: archives and the construction of identity, American archivist, 63, pp.126-151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Alfonso M.V. 2014. The archives of terror and mourning in contemporary Spain, Culture & history digital journal 3(2), http://cultureandhistory.revistas.csic.es/index.php/cultureandhistory/article/view/60/225Google Scholar
Muchefa, L. & Bishi, G. 2015. Governance for development or loyalty? Reading the Zimbabwean colonial court records 1935-1980, Journal of the South African Society of Archivists, 48, pp.77-90Google Scholar
Muchefa, L. 2012. Politicization of memory and the creation of dark histories in Zimbabwe, ESARBICA journal, 3, pp. 125-132.Google Scholar
Munochiveyi, M.B., 2011. Becoming Zimbabwe from below: multiple narratives of Zimbabwean nationalism, Journal of critical African studies, 4(6), pp. 84-108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namhila, E.N. 2016. Content and use of colonial archives; an under-researched issue, Journal of archival science, 16, pp.111-123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Archives of Zimbabwe file ref. S3700/74 Recognition of tribal leaders 1951.Google Scholar
Ramokate, K. 2004. Botswana recovers migrated archives, Mmegi, Available at: http://allafrica.com/stories/200401160269.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ranger, T.O. 1982. Tradition and travesty: chiefs and the administration in Makoni district, Zimbabwe, 1960-1980, Africa, 52, pp.20-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson-Sweet, A. 2018. Truth and reconciliation: archivists as reparations activists, American archivist, 81(1) pp. 23-37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarabia, H. 2003. Language as an ideological weapon of oppression. Paper written for CCS 160: Introduction to Chicana/o Speech in American Society. Retrieved from http://adelasu.tripod.com/papers/Bilingualism_pages.pdfGoogle Scholar
Talbot, C.. UN report accuses Western companies of looting Congo, 26 Oct 2002.https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2002/10/cong-o26.html, visited 05/06/2019Google Scholar
Vilks, A. et al 2013. New emotions, old documents, Culture, memory, identities - Memory of the World Program and diversified perception of the past: papers of the 4th International Conference of the UNESCO “Memory of the world” programme, Warsaw, Poland, 18-21 May 2011, ed. Wojciech Falkowski. Warsaw, Naczelna Dyrekcja Archiwów Pańtstwowych, Weinrich, A.K.H., 1971. Chiefs and councils in Rhodesia: transition from patriarchal to bureaucratic power. London, Heinemann.Google Scholar