Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:59:49.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democracy and New Democracy: The Ideological Debate in the Ethiopian Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Extract

In early 1976 the Ethiopian Amharic language daily, Addis Zemen, opened its columns to a surprisingly free political debate. Through a series of so-called letters to the editor, two political factions, one violently opposed to the military government, the other reluctantly in favor of it, exchanged daily barbs. Both groups considered themselves Marxists-Leninists, both wanted people's government and a socialist revolution. Both, it should be added, used a complex, abstract, highly intellectual and, in addition, not too clear language which rather belied their claims to represent the broad masses. Here, however, the similarity between the two groups stopped. The anti-government faction, initially known as the “Democracia” group, accused the military council and its supporters of fascism. The pro-government group, known as “The Voice of the Masses”, called its rivals anarchists.

This debate was the first and most visible step in an attempt to heal the rift between the military and civilian left in Ethiopia, the major unresolved internal issue of the Ethiopian revolution. From the time of the overthrow of Emperor Haile Selassie in September 1974, the military council, or Derg, was faced with the opposition of one or another faction of the radical intelligentsia, a large section of the student body, the old labor confederation, and, in general, most civilian organized groups. Such opposition was not directed against the policies enacted by the Derg–a sweeping land reform, the nationalization of major industrial concerns, and the organization of the population into peasant associations and urban neighborhood associations whose powers have become quite considerable. Rather, the opposition was directed against the military government per se, dubbed as fascist irrespective of the radical policies it enacted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

This list of references does not include the personal communications and confidential documents which were a very important source of information for this article.

CLANDESTINE PUBLICATIONS

Common Front of Ethiopian Marxist-Leninist Organizations, 1977. “Action Programme,” June, mimeo.Google Scholar
Confederation of Ethiopian Labor Unions, 1974. “Resolutions Passed by the General Assembly of the Confederation of Ethiopian Labor Unions,” September 16, mimeo.Google Scholar
Democracia, selected issues from January to August 1976.Google Scholar
Ethiopian Teachers Association, 1975. “A Resolution Passed by Ethiopian Teachers Association in Its 11th General Meeting at Jimma,” September 10, mimeo.Google Scholar
The Voice of the Masses, selected issues April-June 1976.Google Scholar
Addis Zemen, particularly January-July 1976.Google Scholar
Ethiopian Herald, particularly January-July 1976.Google Scholar
Provisional Military Administrative Council (1974), “Ethiopia Tikdem: The Origins and Future Direction of the Movement,” December 20, 1974, mimeo.Google Scholar
Provisional Military Administrative Council (1976a). “Policy Declaration to Solve the Problem of the Administrative Region of Eritrea in a Peaceful Way,” May 18, mimeo.Google Scholar
Provisional Military Administrative Council (1976 b). “A Proclamation to Establish a People's Organizing Political Office.”Google Scholar
Provisional Military Administrative Council (1976 c). “Programme of the National Democratic Revolution of Ethiopia.”Google Scholar