Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T18:47:54.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Organization of African Unity in the Subordinate African Regional System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Paul Saenz
Paul Saenz*
Affiliation:
African Bureau, Agency for International Development, Washington, D. C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The international system is becoming increasingly characterized by the evolutionary development of integrated subordinate regional systems (see Masters 1961; Haas 1949, 1965; Miller 1967; Segal 1967; Herz 1959; Yalen 1965). The leading scholars in the field have responded to this change by formulating new analytical concepts. Indeed, several preliminary studies have already been published on the developing subordinate regional systems of the Middle East, southern Asia and Africa (Binder 1958, Brecher 1963ab, Zartman 1967, Saenz 1968bc).

The advocates of regionalism and integration theory generally agree that developing subordinate regional systems have basic characteristics in common. These systems are considered to be autonomous, but not entirely independent of the overall international system. The subordinate systems are usually limited to a general geographical identification area. The nature of the system is reflected in a regional organization designed to foster mutual coordination and cooperation on matters of common interest to its members. As is usually the case in the development of new analytical concepts, however, there are several issues of contention concerning the utility of the subordinate regional systems concept (Hanson 1969, Rye 1968, Saenz 1969).

This article will not attempt to deal with all the unanswered questions relating to regional integration. It will, however, attempt to formulate some tentative and exploratory conclusions about those issues that relate specifically to the role of the Organization of African Unity in the developing subordinate African regional system.

Type
Research Article
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , September 1970 , pp. 203 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Binder, L. “The Middle East as a Subordinate International System.” World Politics, X (April 1958), 408–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, M. “International Relations and Asian Studies: The Subordinate State System of Southern Asia.” World Politics, XV (1963a), 214–235.Google Scholar
Brecher, M. The New States of Asia. New York: Wiley, 1963b.Google Scholar
Drake, St. Clair. “Pan-Africanism, Negritude, and the African Personality.” Boston University Graduate Journal, X, 2 (December 1961), 38–51.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernest B. “Regionalism, Functionalism, and Universal International Organization.” World Politics, IX (January 1949), 669–686.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernest B. Beyond the Nation State. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. “Regional Integration: Reflections on a Decade of Theoretical Efforts.” World Politics, XXI, 2 (January 1969), 242–271.Google Scholar
Herz, J. International Politics in the Atomic Age. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Legum, Colin. Pan-Africanism. New York: Praeger, 1962.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. “A Multi-Bloc Model of the International System.” American Political Science Review, X, 4 (December 1961), 780–789.Google Scholar
Miller, L. B. “Regional Organizations and the Regulation of Internal Conflict.” World Politics, XIX, 4 (July 1967), 582–600.Google Scholar
North, Robert C. et al. Content Analysis: A Handbook with Applications for the Study of International Crisis. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Rye, J. S. “Comparative Regional Integration: Concept and Measurement.” International Organization, XXII, 4 (Autumn 1968), 855–880.Google Scholar
Saenz, Paul. Africa's Quest for Unity. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Government, University of Arizona, Tucson, 1965.Google Scholar
Saenz, Paul. An Analysis of the Achievements of the Organization of African Unity in Promoting Continental Cooperation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Government, University of Arizona, Tucson, 1968a.Google Scholar
Saenz, Paul. “The Developing International System in Africa.” Paper presented to the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the African Studies Association, Los Angeles, October 1968b.Google Scholar
Saenz, Paul. “A Summary of Pan-African Achievements.” The Rocky Mountain Social Science Journal, V, 2 (October 1968c), 86–96.Google Scholar
Saenz, Paul. “African Regional Integration: Problems of Analysis and Measurement.” Paper presented to the Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association, Ann Arbor, Michigan, April 1969.Google Scholar
Segal, A. “The Integration of Developing Countries.” Journal of Common Market Studies, V (March 1967), 252–282.Google Scholar
Yalen, R. J. Regionalism and World Order. Washington: Public Affairs Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. W. “Africa as a Subordinate State System in International Relations.” International Organization, XXI (Summer 1967), 545–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar