No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
(Re)negotiating State Authority: How Hinterland Protests against Global Capital Impact the Mediating Role of Traditional Rulers in Postcolonial Sierra Leone
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2024
Abstract
Sesay draws from three hinterland protests against multinational corporations in the mining and agricultural sectors to examine how global capital influences central/local politics in postcolonial Sierra Leone. Focusing specifically on the mediating role of traditional rulers—a strong legacy of British colonial indirect rule—Sesay argues that hinterland protests not only enable the relative autonomy of rural citizens to (re)negotiate with the state outside existing political arrangements but also challenge the broker authority of these rulers in center/peripheral relations. While some protests form new alignment of interest with traditional rulers, others allow rural citizens to bypass their chiefs to summon the attention of central authorities. In either of these processes, the local constituents question the position of chiefs in the indirect governance system and shape the governing strategies adopted by the central government to rule over the hinterland.
Résumé
Sesay s’appuie sur trois manifestations de l’arrière-pays contre des sociétés multinationales dans les secteurs miniers et agricoles pour examiner comment le capital mondial influence la politique centrale et locale en Sierra Leone postcoloniale. En se concentrant spécifiquement sur le rôle de médiateur des dirigeants traditionnels – un héritage important de l’administration indirect colonial britannique – Sesay soutient que les protestations dans l’arrière-pays permettent non seulement l’autonomie relative des citoyens ruraux pour (re)négocier avec l’État en dehors des arrangements politiques existants, mais aussi de contester l’autorité de ces dirigeants dans les relations centre/périphérie. Alors que certaines manifestations forment un nouvel alignement d’intérêts avec les chefs traditionnels, d’autres permettent aux citoyens ruraux de contourner leurs chefs pour attirer l’attention des autorités centrales. Dans l’un ou l’autre de ces processus, les électeurs locaux remettent en question la position des chefs dans le système de gouvernance indirecte et façonnent les stratégies de gouvernance adoptées par le gouvernement central pour régner sur l’arrière-pays.
Resumo
Partindo de três protestos no interior do país contra empresas multinacionais dos setores agrícola e mineiro, Sesay analisa o modo como o capital mundial influencia a política central/local na Serra Leoa pós-colonial. Centrando-se especificamente no papel mediador desempenhado pelos chefes tradicionais – uma forte herança do domínio colonial indireto britânico – Sesay defende que os protestos no interior do país não só permitem a existência de uma certa autonomia dos cidadãos rurais para (re)negociarem com o Estado fora dos limites dos acordos políticos vigentes, como também que estes desafiem a autoridade intermediadora desses chefes nas relações centro-periferia. Enquanto alguns dos protestos criam novos alinhamentos de interesses com os chefes tradicionais, outros permitem que os cidadãos rurais contornem o poder dos seus chefes, de modo a chamarem a atenção das autoridades centrais. Em ambos estes processos, os eleitores locais questionam a posição dos chefes no sistema de governação indireta e contribuem para moldar as estratégias governativas que o governo central adota para administrar o interior do território.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of African Studies Association
References
Acemoglu, Daron, Reed, Tristan, and Robinson, James A.. 2014. “Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Political Economy 122 (2): 319–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International. 2018. “A Force for Good? Restrictions on Peaceful Assembly and Impunity for Excessive Use of Force by the Sierra Leone Police.” London: Amnesty International Ltd.Google Scholar
Arce, Moisés, and Millar, Rebecca. 2016. “Mineral Wealth and Protest in Sub-Saharan Africa.” African Studies Review 59 (3): 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awoko
. 2007. “Koidu Holdings Demo Leaves 2 Dead.” December 17. https://awokonewspaper.sl/koidu-holdings-demo-leaves-2-dead/.Google Scholar
Awoko
. 2012. “NaRGGJ Calls on GoSL to Investigate Bumbuna Violence.” November 5. https://awokonewspaper.sl/nargej-calls-on-gosl-to-investigate-bumbuna-violence/.Google Scholar
Barrows, Walter. 1976. Grassroots Politics in an African State: Integration and Development in Sierra Leone. New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
BBC. 2012. “Sierra Leone Koidu Mine: Foreigners Holed Up after Clashes.” December 19. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-20781940.Google Scholar
Boone, Catherine. 2003. Political Topographies of the African State: Territorial Authority and Institutional Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, John. 1970. Politics in Sierra Leone, 1947-67. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Darin. 2019. “Concession Stands: How Mining Investments Incite Protest in Africa.” International Organization 73 (1): 65–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collier, Gershon. 1970. Sierra Leone: Experiment in Democracy in an African Nation. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
de Bruijne, Kars. 2020 “When Emerging Democracies Breed Violence: Sierra Leone 20 Years after the Civil War.” Produced by ACLED in partnership with Clingendael, and WANEP-SL.Google Scholar
Dietz, Kristina, and Engels, Bettina. 2017. “Contested Extractivism: Actors and Strategies in Conflict over Mining.” Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin 148 (2–3): 111–20.Google Scholar
Englebert, Pierre. 2000. State Legitimacy and Development in Africa. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanthorpe, Richard. 2004. “Post-War Reconstruction in Rural Sierra Leone: What political Structures May Prove viable?” Report for the UK Department for International Development (DFID/SSR Project R8095).Google Scholar
Fanthorpe, Richard. 2005. “On the Limits of Liberal Peace: Chiefs and Democratic Decentralisation in Post-war Sierra Leone.” African Affairs 105 (418): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farole, Thomas, and Winkler, Deborah. 2014. Making Foreign Direct Investment Work for Sub-Saharan Africa: Local Spillovers and Competitiveness in Global Value Chains. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Fofanah, Umaru. 2022. “Sierra Leone Passes New Laws to Boost Landowners’ Rights.” Reuters, August 8.Google Scholar
Government of Sierra Leone. 2019. “Report of the Technical Committee of the Malen Chiefdom Land Dispute in Pujehun District.” September 2019.Google Scholar
Scenery, Green. 2012. “Large Land Deals in Sierra Leone: A Brief Overview.” Briefing notes for the occasion of the first-ever “National Conference of Landowners and Land Users affected by Foreign Direct Investment in Agriculture,” April 2–3, 2012, Freetown.Google Scholar
Scenery, Green. 2013. “‘Is Our Country Part of the Wild West?’ A Moratorium on Large-Scale Land Leases for Agriculture is Urgently Needed in Sierra Leone.” Press Release on April 24, 2013.Google Scholar
Scenery, Green. 2020. “Eighteen Accused MALOA Members Discharge. Press Statement released on December 10, 2020.Google Scholar
Hagmann, Tobias, and Peclard, Didier. 2010. “Negotiated Statehood: Dynamic Power and Domination in Africa.” Development and Change 41 (1): 539–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennings, Anne. 2018. “Plantation Assemblages and Spaces of Contested Development in Sierra Leone and Cambodia.” Conflict, Security & Development 18 (6): 521–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone. 2012. “Report of the Public Inquiry into Alleged Human Rights Violations in Bumbuna, Tonkolili District in Relations to Event of 16th, 17th, and 18th April 2012.” Freetown: Government of Sierra Leone.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2014. “Whose Development: Human Rights Abuses in Sierra Leone’s Mining Boom.” Washington D.C.: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Institute of Governance Reform. 2018. “Presidential Election Results 2018: Lessons Learnt and Implications for the Runoff and Democracy Building.” Policy brief, vol. 4.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 2013 “Staff Report for the 2013 Article IV Consultation and Request for a Three-Year Arrangement under the Extended Credit Facility.” IMF Country Report No. 13/330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacman, Allen. 1990. “Peasants and Rural Social Protest in Africa.” African Studies Review 33 (2): 1–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Paul. 2011. “Decentralized Power and Traditional Authorities: How Power Determines Access to Justice in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 43 (63): 207–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H., and Rosberg, Carl G.. 1982. “Why Africa’s Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood.” World Politics 35 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandeh, Jimmy. 1992. “Politicization of Ethnic Identities in Sierra Leone.” African Studies Review 35 (1): 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilson, Martin. 1966. Political Change in a West African State: A Study of the Modernization Process in Sierra Leone. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matrix, Land. 2016. “Large-scale Land Acquisition: Sierra Leone Profile.” Land Matrix, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse: 1–8.Google Scholar
Lee, Christopher J. 2005. “Subaltern Studies and African Studies.” History Compass 3 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levien, Michael. 2018. Dispossession Without Development: Land Grabs in Neoliberal India. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, Carolyn. 2013. “The Roots of Resilience: Exploring Popular Support for African Traditional Rulers.” African Affairs 112 (448): 353–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, Christian. 2006. “Twilight Institutions: Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa.” Development and Change 37 (4): 685–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martiniello, Giuliano, and Nyamsenda, Sabatho. 2018. “Agrarian Movements in the Neoliberal Era: The Case of MVIWATA in Tanzania.” Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 7 (2):145–72.Google Scholar
Maru, Vivek. 2006. “Between Law and Society: Paralegals and the Provision of Justice Services in Sierra Leone and Worldwide.” The Yale Journal of International Law 31 (427): 128–76.Google Scholar
Millar, Gearoid. 2016. “Local Experiences of Liberal Peace: Marketization and Emergent Conflict Dynamics in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Peace Research 53 (4): 569–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Gearoid. 2018. “Co-Opting Authority and Privatizing Force in Rural Africa: Ensuring Corporate Power Over Land and People.” Rural Sociology 83 (4): 749–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnwana, Sonwabile, and Bowman, Andrew. 2022. “Land, Conflict and Radical Distributive Claims in South Africa’s Rural Mining Frontier.” The Extractive Industry and Society 11: 1–10.Google Scholar
Moyo, Sam, and Yeros, Paris. 2005. Reclaiming the land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Oakland Institute. 2011. “Understanding Land Investment Deals in Africa: Sierra Leone Country Report.” Oakland: The Oakland Institute.Google Scholar
Senessie, Septimus. 2012. “Mine Workers End Strike in Eastern Sierra Leone.” December 20.Google Scholar
Prause, Louisa, and Le Billon, Philippe. 2021. “Struggles for Land: Comparing Resistance Movements against Agro-industrial and Mining Investment Projects.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (5):1100–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, Alison. 2013. “Customary Law and Land in Sierra Leone: From the Mouth of the Paramount Chiefs.” NAMATI Post, December 5, 2013.Google Scholar
Renner-Thomas, Ade. 2010. Land Tenure in Sierra Leone: The Law, Dualism and the Making of a Land Policy. Milton Keynes: AuthorHouse.Google Scholar
Reno, William. 1997. “Humanitarian Emergencies and Warlord Economies in Liberia and Sierra Leone.” Working Papers, 149. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
Richards, Paul. 1996. Fighting for the Rain Forest: War, Youth, and Resources in Sierra Leone. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tangri, Roger. 1978. “Central-Local Politics in Contemporary Sierra Leone.” African Affairs 77 (307): 165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangri, Roger. 1980. “Paramount Chiefs and Central Governments in Sierra Leone.” African Studies 39 (2): 183–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VOA. 2009. “Sierra Leone Police Open Fire on Locals Protesting Mining Practices.” November 1.Google Scholar
Wilson, Sigismon. 2013. “Company-Community Conflict Over Diamond Resources in Kon District, Sierra Leone.” Society and Natural Resources 26 (3): 254–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolford, Wendy, Borras, Saturnino M., Hall, Ruth, Scoones, Ian, and White, Benjamin. 2013. Governing Global Land Deals: The Role of the State in the Rush for Land. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar