Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T22:14:19.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Dilemma of Premature Bureaucratization in the New States of Africa: The Case of Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Extract

The main thesis of this paper is that the apparent failures of bureaucracies in the new and developing states of Africa, far from being concomitants of dismaying negligence and outright incompetence, are, in fact, glaring manifestations of the dilemma of premature bureaucratization.

It is impossible to speak of bureaucratization in African states without reference to those gradual, often times painful, but sustained and systematic separations of administrative processes from the Royal Households and personal loyalties of the nineteenth century Western Europe consequent upon tremendous societal changes that were occurring at the time. It was a process of injecting rationality and efficiency into administrative activities (Bendix, 1968: 208). This process was accentuated with the advent of the Scientific Management School of Organizational Theory, which appeared early in the twentieth century.

From then onward, the prescriptions for modern administrative organizations have been oriented toward a classical conception of rationality. The scientific management school, led by Frederick W. Taylor (1911), was concerned among other things with the motivations of workers, whereas the administrative management school, led by Luther Gulick and L. Urwick (1937), made organization structure their central theme. Following the examples of these two schools of organizational theory, the literature on organization management has tended to emphasize a high degree of control and efficiency, achieved by means of an elaborate network of impersonal rules and order. Organization men are seen as possessing high instrumental capabilities for goal attainment. In other words, the organization men possess all the relevant information and knowledge as regards causes and effects. This element of perfect knowledge discounts possibilities of errors and uncertainties resulting from the indeterminate environment of the organization. Organizational rules, orders, and structures are both necessary and sufficient conditions for organizational efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achebe, Chinua. (1969) No Longer at Ease. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Akintoye, S. A. (1971) Revolution and Power Politics in Yorubaland 1840-1839. London: Longmans Group Ltd.Google Scholar
Aluko, Sam. (1975) “Nigeria: More Money, More Discontent.” Africa 43 (March): 1215.Google Scholar
Asika, Ukpabi. (1973) Olu Obodo: A Seminar on East Central State Public Service in its New Setting. Enugu: The Government Printer.Google Scholar
Atanda, J. A. (1970) “The Changing Status of the Alafin of Oyo Under Colonial Rule and Independence,” pp. 212–30 in Crowder, Michael and Ikime, Obaro (eds.) West African Chiefs. Ile-Ife: University of Ife Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1968) “Bureaucracy,” pp. 206–19 in Sills, David L. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Volume 2. New York: The Macmillan Company and The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bennis, W. G. and Slater, P. E. (1968) The Temporary Society. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
SirBurns, Alan. (1972) History of Nigeria. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Callaway, B. J. (1972) “Transitional Local Politics: Tradition in Local Government Elections in Aba, Nigeria; Keta, Ghana.” African Studies Review 15 (December): 403–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1958) Nigeria: Background to Nationalism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Churchman, C. W. and Schainblatt, A. H. (1969) “PPB: How Can It Be Implemented?Public Administration Review 29 (March-April): 178–88.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Davidson, Basil. (1966) A History of West Africa. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Dror, Yehezkel. (1969) “PPB and the Public Policy-Making System: Some Reflections On the Papers by Bertram Gross and Allen Schick.” Public Administration Review 29 (March-April) : 152–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, B. J. (1966) “Federalism and the Balance of Political Power in Nigeria.” Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies 4 (March): 1622.Google Scholar
Dudley, B. J. (1973) Instability and Political Order. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, E. I. (1974) “Introduction to the Concept of Rationality in Political Science.” Memo.Google Scholar
Gailey, H. A. (1970) The Road to Aba. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W., (eds.) (1946) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, B. M. (1969) “The New Systems Budgeting.” Public Administration Review 29 (March-April): 113–36.Google Scholar
Gulick, L. and Urwick, L. (eds.) (1937) Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration Columbia University.Google Scholar
Gusfield, J. (1971) “Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change,” pp. 1526 in Finkle, J. L. and Gable, R. W. (eds.) Political Development and Social Change. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, Thomas. (1957) Nationalism in Colonial Africa. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk-Greene, A.H.M. (1967) “Some Problems of the African Administrator in the Field Today.” African Affairs 66 (October): 310–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Martin. (1969) “Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap.” Public Administration Review 29 (July-August): 346–58.Google Scholar
Landau, Martin. (1973) “On the Concept of a Self-Correcting Organization.” Public Administration Review 33 (November-December): 533–42.Google Scholar
Lugard, F. D. (1919) Instructions to Political Officer on Subjects Chiefly Political and Administrative. London: Waterlow and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1968) Organization. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mosher, Frederick C. (1968) Democracy and Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, D. J. (ed.) (1970) Studies in Nigerian Administration. London: Hutchinson Educational Ltd.Google Scholar
O'Barr, J. F. (1972) “Cell Leaders in Tanzania.” African Studies Review 15 (December): 437–65.Google Scholar
Okoli, Fidelis. (1973) “The Traditional Political Systems of Akpu, Ajalli and Ufumah in Orumba Area of Aguata Division.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ottenberg, S. (1959) “Ibo Receptivity to Change,” pp. 130–43 in Bascom, William R. and Herskovits, Melville J. (eds.) Continuity and Change in African Cultures. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. (1966) Society: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Perham, Margery. (1937) Native Administration in Nigeria. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. (1972) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
Price, R. M. (1975) Society and Bureaucracy in Contemporary Ghana. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pye, L. W. and Verba, Sidney, (eds.) (1964) Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schick, Allen. (1966) “The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budgeting Reform.” Public Administration Review 26 (November-December): 243–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Allen. (1969) “Systems Politics and Systems Budgeting.” Public Administration Review 29 (March-April): 137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1947) Capitalism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957) Administrative Behavior. London: Collier MacMillan Publishers.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. and March, J. C. (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A., Smithburg, Donald W. and Thompson, Victor A. (1950) Public Administration. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Smith, M. G. (1960) Government in Zazzau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Frederick W. (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D. (1967) Organization in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D. and Tuden, Arthur. (1959) “Strategies, Structures, and Processes of Organizational Decision,” pp. 195216 in Thompson, J. D., Hammond, P. B., Hawkes, R. W., Junker, B. H., and Tuden, A. (eds.) Comparative Studies in Administration. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Victor A. (1964) “Administrative Objectives for Development Administration.” Administrative Science Quarterly 9 (June): 91108.Google Scholar
Tout, Thomas F. (1920) Chapters in the Administrative History of Medieval England. 6 Volumes. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. (1961) Africa: The Politics of Independence. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. (1968) Economy and Society. Edited by Roth, G and Wittich, C. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Claude E. Jr. (ed.) (1967) Political Modernization: A Reader in Comparative Political Change. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. S. (1967) “A Dysrhythmic Process of Political Change.” World Politics. 192: 190217.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. (1966) “The Political Economy of Efficiency: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Systems Analysis and Program Budgeting.” Public Administration Review 26 (December): 292310.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. (1969) “Rescuing Policy Analysis from PPBS.” Public Administration Review 29 (March-April): 189202.Google Scholar