Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-01T17:56:37.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Food Crisis and the Socialist State in Lusophone Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Rosemary E. Galli
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To state that government policy has been at the heart of the agrarian crisis in Lusophone Africa is not to deny the importance of drought, the depressed state of international commodity markets, and externally-provoked destabilization in contributing to food shortages and declining volumes of agricultural exports. Rather, this essay argues that commercial, fiscal, and exchange rate policies and the response of the majority of rural producers to them were the most important factors determining the conditions of production and trade during the period 1974-1984.

In her review of the literature on the food crisis in Africa, Sara Berry (1983) singles out the secular struggle over access to resources as motivating African governments in their policy-making. The crisis in Lusophone Africa can be viewed as a struggle between state officials and peasants over the amount and disposition of marketable surpluses. In each of the countries, politicians and bureaucrats sought control over the marketing and pricing of agricultural products and over the importation of basic consumer goods more as a means of securing state revenues and personal gain than as an instrument for promoting rural development Resistance to exploitative policies by food and export crop producers has been the main reason for the agricultural decline until at least 1984. This resistance manifested itself in various ways: diminished production, parallel markets, smuggling, emigration and support for anti-government forces.

Such behavior has been described before, notably by Robert Bates in his work Markets and States in Tropical Africa (1981). Bates examined how the governments of Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, the Sudan and the Ivory Coast squeezed the incomes of small rural cultivators through taxation, overvalued exchange rates, and monosoponistic marketing boards. Bates explained that governments were attempting to extract revenues and export commodities for financing the state apparatus as well as cheap food and raw materials in the interests of urban industrialists and workers.

Type
Articles
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 19 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agência Geral das Cólonias. 1929. Boletim Geral 44.Google Scholar
Barker, J. 1985. “Gaps in the Debates about Agriculture in Senegal, Tanzania and Mozambique,” World Development 13/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreto, J. 1938. História da Guiné, 1418-1918. Lisbon: author's edition.Google Scholar
Bates, R.H. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bender, C. 1973. Angola Under the Portuguese. London: Heinmann.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 1983. “The Food Crisis and Agrarian Change in Africa: A Review Essay,” African Studies Review 27/2: 59–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreira, A. and de Miereles, A Martins. 1959. “Notas sobre os Movimentos Migratorios da Populaçã;o Natural da Guiné Portuguesa,” Boletim Cultural da Guiné Portuguesa 14/53.Google Scholar
Carreira, A. and de Miereles, A Martins. 1982. The People of the Cape Verde Islands: Exploitation and Emigration. London: C. Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
Clarence-Smith, G. 1985. The Third Portuguese Empire, 1925-1975. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, B. 1981. No Fist is Big Enough to Hide the Sky. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Duarte, F. (ed.). 1946. Anvàrio da Guiné Portuguesa. Bissau.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. 1921. 1962. Portugal in Africa. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
FAO and World Bank Cooperative Programme. 1983. Guinea-Bissau: Agricultural Sector Review. Rome.Google Scholar
Galli, R. 1986. “Amilcar Cabral and Rural Transformation in Guinea- Bissau,” Rural Africana 25/26, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Galli, R. 1987. “On Peasant Productivity: the case of Guinea-Bissau,” Development and Change 18/1, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli, R. and Jones, Jocelyn. 1987. Guinea-Bissau: Politics, Economics and Society. London: Frances Pinter Publishers; Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Hanlon, J. 1984. Mozambique: The Revolution Under Fire. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Hart, K. 1982. The Political Economy of West African Agriculture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. B. 1980. “Conflict, Interaction and Change in Guinea-Bissau: Fulbe Expansion and its Impact, 1815-1900.” Ph.D. dissertation, Los Angeles, UCLA.Google Scholar
Heimer, F.W. 1979. The Decolonization Conflict in Angola, 1974-1976. Geneva: Instirut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. 1979. Angola: Five Centuries of Conflict. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hochet, A.-M. 1983. Paysanneries en Altente. Dakar: ENDA.Google Scholar
Horta, C.A. Picado. 1965. “Anàlise Estructural e Conjunctural da Economía da Guiné,” Boletim Cultural da Guiné Portuguesa 20/80.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. and Tribe, K. 1981. Marxism and the Agrarian Question. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, G. 1980. Beyond Ujamaa in Tanzania. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Monde. 1985. 7 December.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, G. 1984. “The Agrarian Marxist Research in its Political Context: State Policy and the Development of the Soviet Rural Class Structure in the 1920s,” Journal of Peasant Studies 11/2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, K. 1982. Sociological Analysis of the Contuboel Rice Production Project in Guinea-Bissau. Washington, D.C.: Aurora Associates.Google Scholar
Middlemas, K. 1975. Cabora Bassa. London; Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mota, A. Teixeira da. 1954. Guiné Portuguesa. Vol. II. Lisbon: Agência Geral do Ultramar.Google Scholar
Munslow, B. 1984. “State Intervention in Agriculture: the Mozambique Experience,” The Journal of Modern African Studies 22/2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munslow, B. and, Galli, R. 1984. A Comparative Study on Agarian Transformation in the Portuguese-speaking Countries of Africa: Key Issues and Problems. Consultancy report prepared for the FAO seminar, 3-7 December 1984, Cape Verde.Google Scholar
Newitt, M 1981. Portugal in Africa: The Last Hundred Years. London: C. Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
Pelissier, R. 1985. “Angola: Economy'; Mozambique: Economy” Africa, South of the Sahara, 1986. London: Europa Publications. Ltd.Google Scholar
Guiné, Província da. 1964. Relatório da Inspeccçã;o do Comércio Bancàrio Referente ao ano de 1963. Bissau.Google Scholar
Raikes, P. 1984. “Food Policy and Production in Mozambique Since Independence”. Review of African Political Economy 29.Google Scholar
Republica da Cabo Verde, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Rural. 1984. 0 Papel das Instituicões Rurais nas Tranformações Agrárias Para o Desenvolvimento Rural. Praia: Cape Verde.Google Scholar
República da Guiné-Bissau. 1983. Primeiro Piano Quadreinal de Desenvolvimento Económico e Social, 1983-1986. Bissau.Google Scholar
República Popular da Angola, Ministério da Agricultura. 1984. O Papel das Instituições Rurais nas Transformaçõs Agrarias para o Desenvolvimento Rúral. Luanda Google Scholar
Rodney, W. 1970. A History of the Upper Guinea Coast, 1545-1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, M. Ferreira. 1951. “Apontamentos sobre alguns aspectos da economía da Guiné Portuguesa,” Boletim Cultural da Guiné Portuguesa 6/23.Google Scholar
Rudebeck, L. 1984. “Development and Democracy: Notes related to a Study of People's Power in Mozambique.” Paper presented at the Nordic Political Science Congress, 20-22 August, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Saith, A. 1985. “Primitive Accumulation, Agrarian Reform and Socialist Transitions: an Argument,” The Journal of Development Studies 22/1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, J. (ed.). 1985. A Difficult Road: The Transition to Socialism in Mozambique. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
State Secretariat for Planning and International Cooperation. 1983. Bissau Round Table. vol. 1, Bissau.Google Scholar
West Africa. 1986. 6 September.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1976. ‘Taking the Part of the Peasants: Rural Development in Nigeria and Tanzania,” in Gutkind, P. and Wallerstein, I. (eds.), The Political Economy of Contemporary Africa. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wolfers, M. and Bergerol, J. 1983. Angola: The Front Line. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Wuyts, M. 1985. “Money, Planning and Rural Transformation in Mozambique,” The Journal of Development Studies 22/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Errata