Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T01:45:16.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sudan’s Normalization with Israel: A Break with the Past or Another Phase of Extraversion?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

Abstract

Sudan’s decision to normalize relations with Israel sparked controversy about its reasons for doing so and the potential impact on the country’s fragile political transition. The decision was mostly attributed to American pressures, new regional alliances, and Sudan’s economic crisis. Tawfik offers a different perspective by linking Sudan’s normalization with Israel to domestic power rivalries, suggesting that Sudanese political actors at critical historical moments have sought Israeli patronage to strengthen their power positions and exploring the potential implications of normalization on civil-military relations. In addition to relying on secondary sources, Tawfik draws conclusions based on official documents and interviews with Sudanese officials published by various news outlets.

Résumé

Résumé

La décision du Soudan de normaliser ses relations avec Israël a suscité une controverse quant aux raisons de cette décision et à son impact potentiel sur la fragile transition politique du pays. La décision a été principalement attribuée aux pressions américaines, aux nouvelles alliances régionales et à la crise économique du Soudan. Tawfik offre une perspective différente en liant la normalisation du Soudan avec Israël aux rivalités de pouvoir nationaux, suggérant que les acteurs politiques soudanais, à des moments historiques critiques, ont recherché le patronage israélien pour renforcer leurs positions de pouvoir et explorer les implications potentielles de la normalisation sur les relations civiles-militaires. En plus de s’appuyer sur des sources secondaires, Tawfik tire des conclusions à partir de documents officiels et d’entretiens avec des responsables soudanais publiés par divers organes de presse.

Resumo

Resumo

A decisão, por parte do Sudão, de normalizar as relações com Israel desencadeou uma controvérsia em torno das razões para o ter feito e do potencial impacto na frágil transição política do país. A decisão foi maioritariamente atribuída às pressões americanas, às novas alianças regionais e à crise económica sudanesa. Tawfik apresenta uma perspetiva diferente, associando a normalização das relações entre o Sudão e Israel às rivalidades políticas internas, sugerindo que, em momentos históricos-chave, os atores políticos sudaneses procuraram obter o apoio de Israel para reforçar as suas posições de poder e explorando as potenciais implicações da normalização das relações civis e militares. Além de se basear em fontes secundárias, Tawfik retira as suas conclusões a partir de documentos oficiais e de entrevistas a altos responsáveis sudaneses publicadas em vários meios de comunicação.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the African Studies Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadi, Jacob. 1999. “Israel and Sudan: The Saga of an Enigmatic Relationship.” Middle Eastern Studies 35 (3):1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, Abdel Gadir, and El-Battahani, Atta. 2011. “Sudan: Colonial Heritage, Social Polarization and the Democracy Deficit.” In Democracy in the Arab World: Explaining the Deficit, edited by Elbadawi, Ibrahim and Makdisi, Samir, 282310. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Al-Taweel, Amany. 2012. “Israel wa istratijiyat tajze’at al-Sudan (Israel and strategies of Sudan partition).” In Infisal Ganoub Al-Sudan: Al-Makhatar wal Foras (The secession of South Sudan: Risks and Opportunities), 225–57. Doha: Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Bayart, Jean François. 1993. The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bayart, Jean François. 2000. “Africa in the World: A History of Extraversion.” African Affairs 99 (395): 217–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, W.J. 2015. Civil Uprisings in Modern Sudan: the Khartoum Springs of 1964 and 1985. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Raymond. 2003. American Foreign Policy toward the Sudan: From Isolation to Engagement. National War College. Washington: National Defense University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, Christopher. 1996. Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ben. 2012. “South Sudan is a Jewish Cause.” The Algemeiner. April 23. http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/04/23/south-sudan-is-a-jewish-cause/Google Scholar
Day, Christopher, Khisa, Moses, and Reno, William. 2020. “Revisiting the Civil-Military Conundrum in Africa.” Civil Wars 22 (2–3): 156–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Waal, Alex. 2004. “Counter-Insurgency on the Cheap.” Review of African Political Economy 31 (102): 716–25.Google Scholar
Droz-Vincent, Phillipe. 2007. “From Political to Economic Actors: The Changing Roles of Middle Eastern Armies.” In Debating Arab Authoritarianism: Dynamics and Durability in Nondemocratic Regimes, edited by Schlumberger, Oliver, 195211. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
El-Affendi, Abdel Wahab. 2012. “Revolutionary Anatomy: The Lessons of the Sudanese Revolutions of October 1964 and April 1985.” Contemporary Arab Affairs 5 (2): 292306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Battahani, Atta. 2019. Ishkaliyyat Al-Intiqal Al-Siyyasy fel Sudan (The Problematiques of Political Transition in Sudan). Khartoum: The Regional Centre for Development and Training of Civil Society.Google Scholar
El Haj Ali, Hassan. 2017. “Military Coup as Political Transition.” Siyasat Arabiya 24: 5262.Google Scholar
El-Nour, Khaled Tigani. 2020a. “Hawamesh a’la mo’amaret Entebbe (Notes on Entebbe conspiracy).” Elaph Newspaper. February 8.Google Scholar
El-Nour, Khaled Tigani. 2020b. “Mo’amaret al-tatbi’: wa laken ma heya al-masaleh al-wataniyya (normalization conspiracy: but what are the national interest?).” Elaph Newspaper. October 28.Google Scholar
Executive Intelligence Review . 1999. “The Friends of John Garang.” Executive Intelligence Review 26 (20): 40.Google Scholar
Gidron, Yotam. 2018. “ʻOne People, One Struggle’: Anya-Nya Propaganda and the Israeli Mossad in Southern Sudan, 1969–1971.” Journal of Eastern African Studies 12 (3): 428–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzansky, Yoel. 2014. “Israel’s Periphery Doctrine 2.0: The Mediterranean Plus.” Mediterranean Politics 19 (1): 99116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haj Hamad, Abul-Qassim. 1996. Al-Sudan: Al-Ma’zaq al-Tarikhy wa Afaq al-Mostaqbal 1956-1996 (The Sudan: The Historical Crisis and Future Prospects 1956–1996). Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm.Google Scholar
Hamad, Elnour, 2020. “Raf’ aloqobat howa al-mohem (Lifting sanctions in what matters).” Al-Tayar Newspaper. October 26.Google Scholar
Harman, Danna. 2011. “Leaving Bitterness Behind: An Interview with Jospeh Lagu.” Haaretz. January 28.Google Scholar
Hazran, Yusri. 2020. “A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Is That So? Israel and the Minorities Alliance.” Middle Eastern Studies 53 (3): 396411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanz, David. 2009. “Save Darfur: A Movement and Its Discontents.” African Affairs 108 (433): 669–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Jeffrey. 1993. “Middle East Conflicts and Middle Level Power Intervention in the Horn of Africa.” Middle East Journal 50 (3): 387404.Google Scholar
Magid, Jacob, and Staff, Toi. 2021. “Israeli Delegation Said to Visit Sudan Meeting with Leaders Involved in Coup.” The Times of Israel. November 2. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-delegation-said-to-visit-sudan-meeting-with-leaders-involved-in-coup/.Google Scholar
Malwal, Bona. 2015. Sudan and South Sudan: from One to Two. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oded, Arye. 2010. “Africa in Israeli Foreign Policy Expectations and Disenchantment: Historical and Diplomatic Aspects.” Israel Studies 15 (3): 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieffer, Caryn, and Englebert, Pierre. 2012. “Extraversion, Vulnerability to Donors and Political Liberalization in Africa.” African Affairs 111 (444): 355–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Barak. 2018. “In Wake of Haaretz Report, Lawmakers Demand Debate on Israeli Efforts to Bolster Bashir’s Sudan.” Haaretz. April 10. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-mks-demand-debate-on-israels-efforts-to-bolster-sudan-regime-1.5439078Google Scholar
Sharett, Moshe. 1996. Yawmiyyat Shakhsiyah (Personal Diaries). Translated by Khalifa, Ahmad. Lebanon: Palestinian Studies Association.Google Scholar
Sharon, Ariel, and Chanoff, David. 2005. Warrior: An Autobiography. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sidahmed, Abdel Salam, and Sidahmed, Alsir. 2005. Sudan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ian. 2010. International Relations of sub-Saharan Africa. London: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
Warburg, Gabriel. 1992. “The Sudan and Israel: An episode in bilateral relations.” Middle Eastern Studies 28 (2): 385–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar