Article contents
Geriatric Medicine and the Categorisation of Old Age; The Historical Linkage
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2008
Abstract
Geriatric medicine became a part of medical science in the middle of the nineteenth century, more than haifa century before ‘geriatrics’ was named, and a century before it was established in British health care. It was born in Germany along with ancient theories that ageing was in itself a disease, but was increasingly influenced by new pathological and physiological knowledge on ageing and disease, and further developed during the great French clinical era of the latter part of that century. As part of the development of this particular branch of medical science, a gradual categorisation of old age took place, with much credit to the Belgian statistician Quetelet, who may be regarded as the inventor of the category ‘the elderly’ defined by age. The developing biomedical images of old age were given much space in encyclopaedias, dictionaries and popular health literature after 1870. Therefore, the defined existence of old-age limits must also have influenced the legislators responsible for the first national Acts on old- age pension, which now celebrate their centenary.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
NOTES
1 Ariès, P., Centuries of Childhood. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1973.Google Scholar
2 Minois, G., History of Old Age. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar
3 Bois, J. P., Les vieux, De Montaignejusq'au Premières Retraites. Fayard, Paris, 1989.Google Scholar
4 Zeman, F., Studies in the medical history of old age. Journal of Mt. Sinai Hospital. 1942–1950 (in sequentia).Google Scholar
5 Stevenson, B., The Macmillan Book of Proverbs, Maxims and Famous Phrases. The Macmillan Comp., New York, 1965.Google Scholar
6 Montaigne, M., The Essays of Michael, Lord of Montaigne (transl. Florio J.). London, 1897.Google Scholar
7 Holberg, L., Om Alderdommen. Epistel 505. Med kommentarer af Billeskov Jansen. F.J. Hagerup, København, 1951.Google Scholar
8 Peterson, M. and Rose, C. L., Historical antecedents of normative vs pathological perspectives in aging. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 30 (1983), 289–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Cicero, , De Senectute (transl. by Falconer, W. A.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Nascher, I., Geriatrics. The Diseases of Old Age and their Treatment. Blakiston, Philadelphia, 1914.Google Scholar
11 Zeman, F., 1942–1950, op. cit.Google Scholar
12 Means, R. and Smith, R., From Public Assistance Institutions to ‘Sunshine Hotels’: changing State perceptions about residential care for elderly people, 1939–58. Ageing and Society, 3 (1983), 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Howell, T. H., Aspects of the history of geriatric medicine. Proceedings of The Royal Society of Medicine, 69 (1976), 445–9.Google Scholar
14 Zeman, F., 1942–1950, op. cit.Google Scholar
15 Lüth, P., Geschichte der Geriatrie. Ferd. Enke, Erlangen, 1966.Google Scholar
16 Canstatt, C., Die Krankheiten des höheren Alters und ihre Heilung. Ferd. Enke, Erlangen, 1839.Google Scholar
17 ibid., p. 3.
18 ibid., p. 2.
19 Durand-Fardel, M., Traité Clinique et Pratique des Maladies des Viellards, Baillière, Paris, 1854.Google Scholar
20 Charcot, J. M., Leçons Cliniques sur les maladies des vieillards et les maladies chroniques. Delahaye, A., Paris, 1867. (English translation (Hunt, L. H.): Clinical Lectures of the Diseases of Old Age. Williamwood and Co., New York, 1881.)Google Scholar
21 ibid., p. 6.
22 Day, G. E., A Practical Treatise on the Domestic Management and Most Important Diseases of Advanced Life. Lea and Blanchard, Philadelphia, 1849.Google Scholar
23 Maclachlan, D., Practical Treatise on the Diseases and Infirmities of Advanced Life. J. Churchill & Sons, London, 1868.Google Scholar
24 Quetelet, A., Sur l'Homme et le Développement de ses Facultés. L. Hauman, Bruxelles, 1836.Google Scholar
25 ibid., p. 178.
26 Durand-Fardel, , 1854, op. cit., p. xiii.Google Scholar
27 Geist, L., Klinik der Greisenkrankheiten. F. Enke, Erlangen, 1860.Google Scholar
28 ibid. 2, p. 19.
29 Mettenheimer, C., Beiträge zu der Lehre von den Greisenkrankheiten. Eine Sammlung von Krankengeschichten und Nekroskopien eigner Beobachtung. B. Teubner, Leipzig, 1863.Google Scholar
30 Halbert, B., Development of the term ‘senility’ as a medical diagnosis. Minnesota Medicine, 66, 3 (1983), 421–4.Google Scholar
31 Kraepelin, E., Clinical Psychiatry: A Textbook for Students and Physicians (transl. by Diefendorf, A. R.). The MacmillanComp., New York, 1915.Google Scholar
32 Butler, R. N., Why Survive? Being Old in America. Harper and Row, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
33 Haber, C., From senescence to senility: the transformation of senile old age in the nineteenth century. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19 (1984–1985), 41–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Mercier, C., Sanity and Insanity. Scribner and Welford, New York, 1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Kondratowitz, , H.-J., von, Zum Historischen Wandel der Altersposition in der Deutschen Gesellschaft. In: Altwerden in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Geschichte Situationen-Perspeictiven. Bd. 40/1, Beiträge zur Gerontologie und Altenarbeit. Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen e.V., Berlin, 1982.Google Scholar
36 Kirk, H., Ædrebilledet før aldersgrnserne. En undersøgelse af ædrebilledet i leksika og sundhedsbøger 1850–1920. Unifol. Københavns Universitet (1991), 98–109.Google Scholar
37 Petersen, J. H., Den Danske Alderdomsforsürgelseslovgivnings Udvikling. Odense University Press, Odense, 1985.Google Scholar
38 Roebuck, J., When does old age begin?: the evolution of the English definition. Journal of Social History, 12/2 (1978), 416–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 ibid., p. 420.
40 Roebuck, , 1978, op. cit.Google Scholar
41 Kirk, H., 1991, op. cit.Google Scholar
42 Canstatt, C. F., 1939, op. cit.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by