Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:55:44.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of physical activity through virtual reality on design creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Kenton B. Fillingim ,
Hannah Shapiro ,
Catherine J. Reichling  and
Katherine Fu Open the ORCID record for Katherine Fu [Opens in a new window]
Kenton B. Fillingim
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Hannah Shapiro
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Catherine J. Reichling
Affiliation:
School of Industrial Design, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Katherine Fu*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Katherine Fu, E-mail: katherine.fu@me.gatech.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A deeper understanding of creativity and design is essential for the development of tools to improve designers’ creative processes and drive future innovation. The objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of physical activity versus movement in a virtual environment on the creative output of industrial design students. This study contributes a novel assessment of whether the use of virtual reality can produce the same creative output within designers as physical activity has been shown to produce in prior studies. Eighteen industrial design students at the Georgia Institute of Technology completed nine design tasks across three conditions in a within-subjects experimental design. In each condition, participants independently experienced one of three interventions. Solutions were scored for novelty and feasibility, and self-reported mood data was correlated with performance. No significant differences were found in novelty or feasibility of solutions across the conditions. However, there are statistically significant correlations between mood, interventions, and peak performance to be discussed. The results show that participants who experienced movement in virtual reality prior to problem solving performed at an equal or higher level than physical walking for all design tasks and all designer moods. This serves as motivation for continuing to study how VR can provide an impact on a designer's creative output. Hypothesized creative performance with each mode is discussed using trends from four categories of mood, based on the combined mood characteristics of pleasantness (positive/negative) and activation (active/passive).

Keywords

Creativitymoodphysical activityvirtual reality
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 99 - 115
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agulló, B, Montagud, M and Fraile, I (2019) Making interaction with virtual reality accessible: rendering and guiding methods for subtitles. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 33, 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinola, M and Mendes, WB (2008) The dark side of creativity: biological vulnerability and negative emotions lead to greater artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34, 1677–1686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, PL, Price, M, Edwards, SM, Obasaju, MA, Schmertz, SK, Zimand, E and Calamaras, MR (2013) Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 81, 751–760. doi:10.1037/a0033559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashby, FG, Isen, AM and Turken, U (1999) A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review 106, 529–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baas, M, De Dreu, CKW and Nijstad, BA (2008) Supplemental material for a meta-analysis of 25 years of mood–creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin 134, 779–806. doi:10.1037/a0012815.supp.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baas, M, De Dreu, CKW and Nijstad, BA (2011) Creative production by angry people peaks early on, decreases over time, and is relatively unstructured. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, 1107–1115. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.009.Google Scholar
Bar, M (2009) A cognitive neuroscience hypothesis of mood and depression. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 456–463. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanchette, DM, Ramocki, SP, O'Del, JN and Casey, MS (2005) Aerobic exercise and creative potential: immediate and residual effects. Creativity Research Journal 17, 257–264. doi:10.1080/10400419.2005.9651483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chermahini, SA and Hommel, B (2012) Creative mood swings: divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways . Psychological Research. 76. 634–640. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0358-zGoogle Scholar
Cohen, JR and Ferrari, JR (2010) Take some time to think this over: the relation between rumination, indecision, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal 22, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dane, E and Pratt, MG (2009) Conceptualizing and measuring intuition: a review of recent trends. In Hodgkinson, GP and Ford, JK (eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 24. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Desmet, PMA, Vastenburg, MH, Van Bel, D and Romero, N (2012) Pick-A-Mood: development and application of a pictorial mood-reporting. Proceedings of the 8th International Design and Emotion Conference. Central Saint Martins College of Art & Design, London. 11–14 September 2012.Google Scholar
Desmet, PMA, Vastenburg, MH and Romero, N (2016) Mood measurement with Pick-A-Mood: review of current methods and design of a pictorial self-report scale. Journal of Design Research 14, 241–279.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A (2004) Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87, 586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijksterhuis, A, Bos, MW, Nordgren, LF and Van Baaren, RB (2006) On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science 311, 1005–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastwood, JD, Frischen, A, Fenske, MJ and Smilek, D (2012) The unengaged mind: defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, 482–495. doi:10.1177/1745691612456044.Google ScholarPubMed
Ekstrom, RB, French, JW, Harman, HH and Derman, D (1976) Manual for Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Farmer, R and Sundberg, ND (1986) Boredom proneness – the development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 50, 4–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, G, Giaccardi, E, Eden, H, Sugimoto, M and Ye, Y (2005) Beyond binary choices: integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63, 4.Google Scholar
Gerry, LJ (2017) Paint with me: stimulating creativity and empathy while painting with a painter in virtual reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1418–1426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, YK, Eastwood, JD, Laguardia, J and Danckert, J (2011) Boredom: an emotional experience distinct from apathy, anhedonia, or depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 30, 647–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Google, I. (2017). Cardboard. Retrieved from: https://vr.google.com/cardboard/Google Scholar
Guaghran, WF (2002) Cognitive Modelling for Engineers. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Montreal, Canada. 16-19 June 2002.Google Scholar
Han, J, Shi, F, Chen, L and Childs, PRN (2018) A computational tool for creative idea generation based on analogical reasoning and ontology. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 32, 462–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, HG, Chambers, GT, Meyer, WJ III, Arceneaux, LL, Russell, WJ, Seibel, EJ, Richards, TL, Sharar, SR and Patterson, DR (2011) Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 41, 183–191. doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9248-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keefe, FJ, Huling, DA, Coggins, MJ, Keefe, DF, Zachary Rosenthal, M, Herr, NR and Hoffman, HG (2012) Virtual reality for persistent pain: a new direction for behavioral pain management. Pain 153, 2163–2166. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, CY and Yeh, YY (2016) Sensorimotor-conceptual integration in free walking enhances divergent thinking for young and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1580. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lan, MF, Lane, AM, Roy, J and Hanin, NA (2012) Validity of the Brunel mood scale for use with Malaysian athletes. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 11, 131–135.Google ScholarPubMed
Linsey, J (2007) Design-by-Analogy and Representation in Innovative Engineering Concept Generation (PhD thesis). The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Maher, ML, Rosenman, M and Merrick, K (2007) Agents for multidisciplinary design in virtual worlds. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerbroker, K and Emmelkamp, PM (2010) Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a systematic review of process-and-outcome studies. Depress Anxiety 27, 933–944. doi:10.1002/da.20734.Google ScholarPubMed
Moreno, DP, Blessing, LT, Yang, MC, Hernández, AA and Wood, KL (2016) Overcoming design fixation: design by analogy studies and nonintuitive findings. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 30, 185–199.Google Scholar
Moss, J, Kotovsky, K and Cagan, J (2007) The influence of open goals on the acquisition of problem-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33, 876–891. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagai, Y and Gero, J (2012) Design creativity. Journal of Engineering Design 23, 237–239. doi:10.1080/09544828.2011.642495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Y, Tomer, R, Axelrad, S, Argov, E and Inbar, O (2007) The effect of a single aerobic training session on cognitive flexibility in late middle-aged adults. International Journal of Sports Medicine 28, 82–87. doi:10.1055/s-2006-924027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oenning-Hodgson, M (2006) Anxiety and creativity. Psychological Perspectives: A Semiannual Journal of Jungian Thought 49, 111–121. doi:10.1080/00332920600733073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppezzo, M and Schwartz, DL (2014) Give your ideas some legs: the positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40, 1142–1152. doi:10.1037/a0036577.Google ScholarPubMed
Plante, TG, Aldridge, A, Bogden, R and Hanelin, C (2003) Might virtual reality promote the mood benefits of exercise? Computers in Human Behavior 19, 495–509.Google Scholar
Plante, TG, Cage, C, Clements, S and Stover, A (2006) Psychological benefits of exercise paired with virtual reality: outdoor exercise energizes whereas indoor virtual exercise relaxes. International Journal of Stress Management 13, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puccio, GJ, Cabra, JF, Fox, JM and Cahen, H (2010) Creativity on demand: historical approaches and future trends. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raidl, M-H and Lubart, TI (2001) An empirical study of intuition and creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 20, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranjan, BSC, Siddharth, L and Chakrabarti, A (2018) A systematic approach to assessing novelty, requirement satisfaction, and creativity. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 32, 390–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raviselvam, S, Hölttä-Otto, K and Wood, KL (2016) User extreme conditions to enhance designer empathy and creativity: applications using visual impairment. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restrepo, J and Christiaans, H (2004) Problem structuring and information access in design. Journal of Design Research 4, 218–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, JA (1980) A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, P and Chakrabarti, A (2011) Assessing design creativity. Design Studies 32, 348–383. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, JJ, Smith, SM and Vargas-Hernandez, N (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24, 111–134. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(02)00034-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slepian, ML and Ambady, N (2012) Fluid movement and creativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 141, 625–629. doi:10.1037/a0027395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srivathsavai, R, Genco, N, Hölttä-Otto, K and Seepersad, CC (2010). Study of existing metrics used in measurement of ideation effectiveness. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 44137, pp. 355–366. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, RJ (ed.) (1999) Handbook of Creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Studer, JA, Daly, SR, McKilligan, S and Seifert, CM (2018) Evidence of problem exploration in creative designs. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 32, 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundström, P and Zika-Viktorsson, A (2003) Innovation Through Exploration Thinking in Product Development Projects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Tang, YM, Au, KM and Leung, Y (2018) Comprehending products with mixed reality: geometric relationships and creativity. International Journal of Engineering Business Management 10, 1847979018809599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, PC, Lane, AM and Fogarty, GJ (2003) Construct validity of the profile of mood states — adolescents for use with adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 4, 125–139. doi:10.1016/s1469-0292(01)00035-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill-Miller, B and Dupont, JM (2016) Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 15, 102–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhaeghen, P, Joormann, J and Aikman, SN (2014) Creativity, mood, and the examined life: self-reflective rumination boosts creativity, brooking breeds dysphoria. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts 8, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vodanovich, SJ (2003) Psychometric measures of boredom: a review of the literature. Journal of Psychology 137, 569–595. doi:10.1080/00223980309600636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vytal, K, Cornwell, B, Arkin, N and Grillon, C (2012) Describing the interplay between anxiety and cognition: from impaired performance under low cognitive load to reduced anxiety under high load. Psychophysiology 49, 842–852. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01358.x.Google ScholarPubMed
Wallach, HS, Safir, MP and Bar-Zvi, M (2009) Virtual reality cognitive behavior therapy for public speaking anxiety. Behavior Modification 33, 314–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D, Clark, LA and Tellegen, A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westcott, MR (1968) On the measurement of intuitive leaps. Psychological Reports 9, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, CB, Gero, J, Lee, Y and Paretti, M (2011) Exploring the Effect of Design Education on the Design Cognition of Mechanical Engineering Students. Paper presented at the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, JL, Hoffman, HG and Sweet, RM (2005) Virtual reality as an adjunctive pain control during transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Urology 66, 1320. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, X, Lin, L, Cheng, PY, Yang, X, Ren, Y and Huang, YM (2018) Examining creativity through a virtual reality support system. Educational Technology Research and Development 66, 1231–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, S, Seifert, CM and Gonzalez, R (2010) Cognitive heuristics in design: instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, CQ, Si, G, Chung, PK, Du, M and Terry, PC (2014) Psychometric properties of the Brunel Mood Scale in Chinese adolescents and adults. Journal of Sports Sciences 32, 1465–1476.Google ScholarPubMed