No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Prediction of the onset of shear localization based on machine learning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2023
Abstract
Predicting the onset of shear localization is among the most challenging problems in machining. This phenomenon affects the process outputs, such as machining forces, surface quality, and machined part tolerances. To predict this phenomenon, analytical, experimental, and numerical methods (especially finite element analysis) are widely used. However, the limitations of each method hinder their industrial applications, demanding a reliable and time-saving approach to predict shear localization onset. Additionally, since this phenomenon largely depends on the type and parameters of the constitutive material model, any change in these parameters requires a new set of simulations, which puts further restrictions on the application of finite element modeling. This study aims to overcome the computational efficiency of the finite element method to predict the onset of shear localization when machining Ti6Al4V using machine learning methods. The obtained results demonstrate that the FCM (fuzzy c-means) clustering ANFIS (adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system) has given better results in both training and testing when it is compared to the ANN (artificial neural network) architecture with an R2 of 0.9981. Regarding this, the FCM-ANFIS is a good candidate to calculate the critical cutting speed. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study in the literature that uses a machine learning tool to predict shear localization.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Abdulshahed, A, Longstaff, AP, Fletcher, S and Myers, A (2013) Comparative study of ANN and ANFIS prediction models for thermal error compensation on CNC machine tools. In Lamdamap 10th International Conference. Euspen, pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
Abdulshahed, AM, Longstaff, AP, Fletcher, S and Myers, A (2015) Thermal error modelling of machine tools based on ANFIS with fuzzy c-means clustering using a thermal imaging camera. Applied Mathematical Modelling 39, 1837–1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, A, Aljuhni, A, Arshid, U, Elchalakani, M and Abed, F (2022) Prediction of columns with GFRP bars through Artificial Neural Network and ABAQUS. In Structures. Elsevier, pp. 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aifantis, EC (1987) The physics of plastic deformation. International Journal of Plasticity 3, 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altaher, A and BaRukab, O (2017) Android malware classification based on ANFIS with fuzzy c-means clustering using significant application permissions. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 25, 2232–2242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylı, E (2020) Modeling of mixed convection in an enclosure using multiple regression, artificial neural network, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system models. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 234, 3078–3093.Google Scholar
Baghirli, O (2015) Comparison of Lavenberg-Marquardt, scaled conjugate gradient and Bayesian regularization backpropagation algorithms for multistep ahead wind speed forecasting using multilayer perceptron feedforward neural network.Google Scholar
Bäker, M, Rösler, J and Siemers, C (2002) A finite element model of high speed metal cutting with adiabatic shearing. Computers & Structures 80, 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, MH, Hagan, MT and Demuth, HB (1992) “Neural network toolbox user's guide. The MathWorks Inc, 103.Google Scholar
Calamaz, M, Coupard, D and Girot, F (2008) A new material model for 2D numerical simulation of serrated chip formation when machining titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 48, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceretti, E, Lucchi, M and Altan, T (1999) FEM simulation of orthogonal cutting: serrated chip formation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 95, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z, Zou, J and Wang, W (2022) Towards comprehensive digital evaluation of low-carbon machining process planning. AI EDAM 36, E21.Google Scholar
Ducobu, F, Rivière-Lorphèvre, E and Filippi, E (2015) On the introduction of adaptive mass scaling in a finite element model of Ti6Al4V orthogonal cutting. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 53, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbestawi, MA, Srivastava, AK and El-Wardany, TI (1996) A model for chip formation during machining of hardened steel. CIRP Annals 45, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Famili, A (1994) Use of decision-tree induction for process optimization and knowledge refinement of an industrial process. AI EDAM 8, 63–75.Google Scholar
Fleischer, J, Schmidt, J, Xie, LJ, Schmidt, C and Biesinger, F (2004) 2D tool wear estimation using finite element method. In Proc. of the 7th CIRP International Workshop on Modeling of Machining Operations, pp. 82–91.Google Scholar
Gang, W and Wang, J (2013) Predictive ANN models of ground heat exchanger for the control of hybrid ground source heat pump systems. Applied Energy 112, 1146–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, YB and Chou, YK (2004) The determination of ploughing force and its influence on material properties in metal cutting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 148, 368–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, AK, Kumar, P, Sahoo, RK, Sahu, AK and Sarangi, SK (2017) Performance measurement of plate fin heat exchanger by exploration: ANN, ANFIS, GA, and SA. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 4, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, HATJM, Riga, AT, Gahoon, JM and Scott, CG (1993) Machinability of steels and titanium alloys under lubrication. Wear 162, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, J, Lei, J, Ding, K, Zhang, F and Lv, J (2021) Autonomous resource allocation of smart workshop for cloud machining orders. AI EDAM 35, 226–239.Google Scholar
Jang, J-SR, Sun, C-T and Mizutani, E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing – a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 42, 1482–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpat, Y (2010) A modified material model for the finite element simulation of machining titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4 V. Machining Science and Technology 14, 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komanduri, R and Brown, RH (1981) On the mechanics of chip segmentation in machining.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komanduri, R and Hou, Z-B (2002) On thermoplastic shear instability in the machining of a titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4 V). Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 33, 2995–3010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramar, D, Cica, D, Sredanovic, B and Kopac, J (2016) Design of fuzzy expert system for predicting of surface roughness in high-pressure jet assisted turning using bioinspired algorithms. AI EDAM 30, 96–106.Google Scholar
Leyens, C and Peters, M (2003) Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B, Zhang, S, Zhang, Q and Li, L (2019) Simulated and experimental analysis on serrated chip formation for hard milling process. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 44, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabrouki, T and Rigal, J-F (2006) A contribution to a qualitative understanding of thermo-mechanical effects during chip formation in hard turning. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 176, 214–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogush, JE, Carrega, D, Spirtes, P and Fox, MS (1988) Treatment selection by constraint propagation: a case study in cutting fluid selection. AI EDAM 2, 135–168.Google Scholar
Mohammed, AI, Bartlett, M, Oyeneyin, B, Kayvantash, K and Njuguna, J (2021) An application of FEA and machine learning for the prediction and optimisation of casing buckling and deformation responses in shale gas wells in an in-situ operation. Journal of Natural gas Science and Engineering 95, 104221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nariman–Zadeh, N, Darvizeh, A and Dadfarmai, MH (2003) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems networks design using hybrid genetic and singular value decomposition methods for modeling and prediction of the explosive cutting process. AI EDAM 17, 313–324.Google Scholar
Niu, QL, Zheng, XH, Ming, WW and Chen, M (2013) Friction and wear performance of titanium alloys against tungsten carbide under dry sliding and water lubrication. Tribology Transactions 56, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nsaif, OS (2019) Numerical study of the effects of geometric parameters on performance of solar chimney power plants.Google Scholar
Oliaei, SNB and Karpat, Y (2017 a) Built-up edge effects on process outputs of titanium alloy micro milling. Precision Engineering 49, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliaei, SNB and Karpat, Y (2017 b) Investigating the influence of friction conditions on finite element simulation of microscale machining with the presence of built-up edge. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 90, 819–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outeiro, JC, Umbrello, D, M'Saoubi, R and Jawahir, IS (2015) Evaluation of present numerical models for predicting metal cutting performance and residual stresses. Machining Science and Technology 19, 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulachon, G and Moisan, A (1998) A contribution to the study of the cutting mechanisms during high speed machining of hardened steel. CIRP Annals 47, 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourmostaghimi, V, Zadshakoyan, M and Badamchizadeh, MA (2020) Intelligent model-based optimization of cutting parameters for high quality turning of hardened AISI d2. AI EDAM 34, 421–429.Google Scholar
Pourtousi, M, Sahu, JN, Ganesan, P, Shamshirband, S and Redzwan, G (2015) A combination of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy system (ANFIS) for prediction of the bubble column hydrodynamics. Powder Technology 274, 466–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojek, I (2017) Technological process planning by the use of neural networks. AI EDAM 31, 1–15.Google Scholar
Saeed, RA, Galybin, AN and Popov, V (2013) 3D fluid–structure modelling and vibration analysis for fault diagnosis of Francis turbine using multiple ANN and multiple ANFIS. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 34, 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña-Robles, AL, Bustos-Gaytán, A, Diosdado-De la Peña, JA, Saldaña-Robles, A, Alcántar-Camarena, V, Balvantín-García, A and Saldaña-Robles, N (2020) Structural design of an agricultural backhoe using TA, FEA, RSM and ANN. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 172, 105278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semiatin, SL and Rao, SB (1983) Shear localization during metal cutting. Materials Science and Engineering 61, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevil, HE and Ozdemir, S (2011) Prediction of microdrill breakage using rough sets. AI EDAM 25, 15–23.Google Scholar
Sima, M and Özel, T (2010) Modified material constitutive models for serrated chip formation simulations and experimental validation in machining of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 50, 943–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tay, AO, Stevenson, MG and de Vahl Davis, G (1974) Using the finite element method to determine temperature distributions in orthogonal machining. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 188, 627–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbrello, D (2008) Finite element simulation of conventional and high speed machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 196, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderhasten, M, Rabet, L and Verlinden, B (2007) Deformation mechanisms of Ti-6Al-4 V during tensile behavior at low strain rate. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 16, 208–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varol, Y, Avci, E, Koca, A and Oztop, HF (2007) Prediction of flow fields and temperature distributions due to natural convection in a triangular enclosure using adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and artificial neural network (ANN). International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 34, 887–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyas, ASME and Shaw, MC (1999) Mechanics of saw-tooth chip formation in metal cutting.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, ZP, Zhu, YE, Liu, HW and Tang, Y (2012) Microstructure evolution of adiabatic shear bands and mechanisms of saw-tooth chip formation in machining Ti6Al4V. Materials Science and Engineering: A 531, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B and Liu, Z (2015) Shear localization sensitivity analysis for Johnson–Cook constitutive parameters on serrated chips in high speed machining of Ti6Al4V. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 55, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, K-C, Tseng, P-C and Lin, K-M (2006) Thermal error modeling of a machining center using grey system theory and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system. JSME International Journal Series C Mechanical Systems. Machine Elements and Manufacturing 49, 1179–1187.Google Scholar
Ye, GG, Chen, Y, Xue, SF and Dai, LH (2014) Critical cutting speed for onset of serrated chip flow in high speed machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 86, 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, Y-C, Jain, A and Altan, T (2004) A finite element analysis of orthogonal machining using different tool edge geometries. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 146, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yılmaz, OD and Oliaei, SNB (2020) Effect of constitutive material model on the finite element simulation of shear localization onset. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 104, 102105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar