Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T09:28:53.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation Policies in the Royal Forests of Medieval England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Charles R. Young
Get access

Extract

The whole subject of forests, especially forests in the Middle Ages, is overlaid with a great deal of romanticism. The picture of a heavily-wooded England with primeval forests dotted here and there with villages connected by meandering tracks to relieve their isolation is fixed. Only a handful of Robin Hood bands lived within the depths of the forest itself. The present concern for man's destruction of his environment has caused this idyllic picture to be contrasted with the denuded landscape of large areas today, and the pathetic remnants of Sherwood Forest can be used as a cautionary lesson on industrialization since the eighteenth century. In fact, that lesson needs to be extended backward in time and the picture of the untouched medieval forest abandoned, for the reality was that men in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries made heavy use of the forests and encroached upon them just as man had done since he first came to the island or, more emphatically, since the Anglo-Saxon invaders began to make drastic changes in forested areas by their farming practices. However, after the Norman Conquest, the policies adopted for the royal forests did serve as some protection for the trees, even though the Norman kings no more had this as their purpose than had their predecessors. The thesis of this article is that the medieval English kings from the Normans on were conservationists in spite of themselves, even in the face of continuous demands from their own barons for disafforestment. Royal forest regulations enforced within the extensive areas under forest law protected the trees from complete destruction and slowed the inevitable encroachment of field upon forest.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Summer 1978 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tubbs, Colin R., The New Forest: An Ecological History (London, 1968), pp. 28–38Google Scholar; Darby, H.C., Domesday England (Cambridge, 1977), p. 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 For a more elaborate legal definition, see Turner, G.J., ed., Select Pleas of the Forest, Selden Society, vol. 13 (London, 1901), p. ixGoogle Scholar.

3 The estimate of area was made by Bazeley, Margaret, “The Extent of the English Forest in the Thirteenth Century,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 4th ser., 4 (1921): 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 F. H. M. Parker, “The Forest Laws and the Death of William Rufus,” and Baring, F. H., “The Making of the New Forest,” English Historical Review, 27 (1912): 38, 513–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Darby, pp. 198-99; Whitelock, Dorothy, ed. and trans., The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (New Brunswick, 1961), p. 165Google Scholar.

5 Cronne, H. A., “The Royal Forest in the Reign of Henry I,” in Essays in British and Irish History in Honour of James Eadie Todd, (London, 1949), p. 18Google Scholar.

6 fitz Nigel, Richard, Dialogus de Scaccario, ed. and trans. Johnson, Charles (London, 1950), pp. 56–59Google Scholar. Figures for making and renting assarts are a feature of any roll in records classed as P. R. O., Exchequer, Treasury of Receipt, Forest Proceedings.

7 Leges Henrici Primi, ed. Downer, L. J. (Oxford, 1972), p. 121Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., p. 145.

9 Cronne, p. 9.

10 Translated in Douglas, David C. and Greenaway, George W., eds., English Historical Documents 1042-1189 (London, 1953), pp. 418–20Google Scholar.

11 Richard fitz Nigel, p. 61.

12 Stubbs, William, ed., Select Charters, 8th ed. (Oxford, 1905), pp. 348–51Google Scholar.

13 Close Rolls 1259-61, (The Deputy Keeper of the Records: London, 1902-) pp. 139–140Google Scholar.

14 Ibid., pp. 140-141. P. R. O., Exchequer, Treasury of Receipt, Forest Proceedings, 194 gives the jurors' replies to the chapters of a regard.

15 P. R. O. Exchequer, Treasury of Receipt, Forest Proceedings, 235; Pipe Roll 14 Henry II (London, 1884) p. 44Google Scholar.

16 Pipe Roll 2 Richard I, pp. 67, 145; 6 John, pp. 32, 40, 85, 189; 9 John, p. 66; Rotuli Chartarum, ed. Hardy, Thomas D. (London, 1837): I, pt. 1, 1-2, 40, 42-43Google Scholar; Rotuli Litterarum Clausarum, ed. Hardy, Thomas D. (London, 1834–1844): 1, 10–11, 15, 33, 197Google Scholar.

17 Turner, pp. 44-53.

18 Patent Rolls 1225-32, (London, 1901) p. 316Google Scholar; Calendar of the Close Rolls 1237-39, (London, 1900-), pp. 316–17Google Scholar.

19 Calendar of the Patent Rolls 1232-47, (The Deputy Keeper of the Records:Google Scholar

20 Close Rolls 1251-53, pp. 227, 243.

21 “Annales de Burton,” in Luard, Henry R., ed., Annales Monastici (Rolls Series: London, 1864–1869): I, 251–52Google Scholar; Calendar of the Patent Rolls 1232-47, pp. 186-87, 216.

22 P.R.O., Exchequer, King's Remembrancer, Various Accounts, 139/9.

23 Ibid., 136/8.

24 Close Rolls 1256-59, p. 131.

25 Calendar of the Patent Rolls 1307-13, p. 206.

26 Close Rolls 1234-37, p. 248.

27 Calendar of the Patent Rolls 1272-81, p. 436; Calendar of the Close Rolls 1272-79, p. 364; 1279-88, p. 78; 1288-96, p. 163.

28 P. R.O., Exchequer, King's Remembrancer, Various Accounts, 139/22, 139/24, 140/17.

29 Statutes of the Realm, II: 474–75Google Scholar.

30 Silva, or a Discourse of Forest-trees. 2nd ed.; (London, 1670), p. 206Google Scholar.

31 Before the Industrial Revolution: European Society and Economy, 1000-1700 (New York, 1976), p. 109Google Scholar.

32 Petit-Dutaillis, Charles, Studies and Notes Supplementary to Stubbs' Constitutional History (Manchester, 1930), p. 232Google Scholar; Young, Charles R., “The Forest Eyre in England during the Thirteenth Century,” The American Journal of Legal History, 28 (1974): 322, 331Google Scholar. A tabulation of regards from commissions to sheriffs as recorded-in the Close Rolls reveals that regards ceased to be held after 1360 except for three forests north of the Trent.

33 Cipolla, pp. 229-30; Darby, H. C., ed., A New Historical Geography of England (Cambridge, 1973), pp. 272–73Google Scholar.