Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T19:59:35.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Interjection of the Royal Prerogative Into the Legal and Ecclesiastical Affairs of Cheshire in the Fifteen Seventies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Get access

Extract

It has been remarked that the dissolution of the monasteries amounted to an infinite series of adjustments. This could hardly be more true than it is in the case of what happened to the lands of the dissolved abbey of St. Werburgh in Chester—a city about one hundred and seventy miles northwest of London, situated in a section of the country that was, at least compared with much of the south, uncouth and backward. Here the process of adjustment was so protracted, and in the end productive of so much acrimony, that the intervention of the highest authority in the land—that of the queen herself—was directly necessary for its successful completion, and, even with that intervention, a final concord was scarcely achieved before the 16th century gave way to the seventeenth. In Cheshire, the upheaval caused by the sudden disappearance of the regular Church was long in settling down. Settlement there was, eventually, but it was so slow in coming that one might consider amending the definition of the dissolution mentioned above to read: an infinite series of adjustments, almost infinitely prolonged.

What happened in Cheshire can be seen from at least two viewpoints. It can be viewed as providing spectacular evidence as to who benefited the most from Henry VIII's attack upon the ecclesiastical institution; or it can be cited as a case study of just how the central government exercised its control over local affairs during the latter sixteenth century. Here I am concerned with both.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 British Museum, Harleian MS 2016, new f. 76-97 constitutes a contemporary, highly detailed history of the situation as it stood in the 1570s, including transcriptions, in the same clerkly hand, of those documents the anonymous compiler considered relevant to the matter in hand. My account of the Case is based on these folios, of which there is a later copy in Lansdowne MS 27. There are also a few odd letters in Lansdowne MS 104.

2 Letters and Papers, Foreign Domestic, of the Reign of Henry VIII, XVI (London: HMSO, 1898) No. 1135, p. 535Google Scholar. grant s mad e in August, 1541.

3 The Acts of the Privy Council of England, new series, IV, 1552-1554 (London: HMSO, 1892), p. 163, November 8, 1552.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., 218, February 14, 1553.

5 Ormerod, G., History of the County Palatine and City of Chester, 2nd edition, ed. Helsby, T., 1882Google Scholar; Burne, R. V. H., Chester Cathedral, from its founding by Henry VIII to the accession of Queen Victoria, (London: SPCK, 1958), pp. 24–26, 7282.Google Scholar