Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T06:26:55.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The National Council of Labour, 1921–1946*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Get access

Extract

The National Council of Labour attempted to coordinate the policies and actions of the Trades Union Congress and Labour party. It had a checkered history and eventually failed. Its existence, however, demonstrated that the leadership of the Trades Union Congress and Labour party were grappling with questions which have constantly confronted modern British labor, especially the ever-present controversy over the TUC and party relationship, as well as whether a unified labor movement is possible or even desirable, or whether the TUC and labour party appropriately represent components within such a movement. If the last is true, do both institutions share fundamental concepts, and can they develop common tactics or approaches in furthering them? Are those “two wings” mutually dependent? Can the party aid the TUC in achieving its political goals? If the concerns of the TUC and party differ, can they or should they be reconciled? Should the TUC-party relationship remain the same whether the party is in government or in opposition?

The National Council of Labour consisted of representatives from the TUC's General Council, the Labour party's National Executive Committee (NEC), and the parliamentary Labour party's Executive Committee (PLP executive). Originally created in 1921 as the National Joint Council, it was reconstituted in 1930 and again in 1931-32, renamed the National Council of Labour in 1934, and began declining in 1940 to impotence by 1946. It was an extra-parliamentary, extra-party body designed to enhance cooperation and coherence within the labor movement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented in November 1983 to the Southern Historical Association, where comments from Professors John D. Fair and Bentley B. Gilbert were most helpful. The research was supported financially by the Middle Tennessee State University Faculty Research Fund.

References

1 This article uses the title National Council of Labour for all general comments. Both Labour Party Archives (LPA) and Congress House (TUC) contain National Joint Council (NJC) and National Council of Labour (NCL) minute books and documents. Both locations contain minutes of most Joint Meetings of the General Council (GC) and National Executive Committee (NEC), sometimes to include the parliamentary Labour party executive (PLP ex.).

2 Pelling, Henry, A Short History of the Labour Party (5th ed.; New York, 1976), p. 71 (see also pp. 68, 169)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Pelling, Henry, A History of British Trade Unionism (London, 1966), p. 198Google Scholar. Stated less boldly but still overstressing the NCL's influence is Brand, Carl F., The British Labour Party: A Short History (Rev. ed.; Stanford, 1974), p. 162Google Scholar.

3 Bullock, Alan, The Life and Times of Ernest Bevin, 3 vols. (London, 1960-1983), 1:512Google Scholar. Naylor, John F., Labour's International Policy: The Labour Party in the 1930's (Boston, 1969), described it as “advisory” then “authoritative” (p. 25)Google Scholar, and elsewhere as “the Movement's advisory board” (p. 142).

4 Beer, Samuel H., Modern British Politics: Parties and Pressure Groups in the Collectivist Age (New York, 1982), p. 162.Google Scholar

5 Williams, Francis, Ernest Bevin: Portrait of a Great Englishman (London, 1952), p. 180Google Scholar.

6 McKenzie, R. T., British Political Parties: The Distribution of Power Within the Conservative and Labour Parties, (2nd ed.; London, 1963), p. 528Google Scholar; Allen, Victor L., Trade Union Leadership: Based on a Study of Arthur Deakin (Cambridge, 1957), p. 88Google Scholar; and Donoughue, Bernard and Jones, G. W., Herbert Morrison: Portrait of a Politician (London, 1973), p. 218Google Scholar. McHenry, Dean E., His Majesty's Opposition: Structure and Problems of the British Labour Party (Berkeley, 1940)Google Scholar, wrote of “policy … decided by” the NCL (p. 263), but also that it “attempts to agree on a common policy” (p. 26).

7 Pimlott, Ben, Labour and the Left in the 1930s (Cambridge, 1977), pp. 1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Martin, Ross M., TUC: The Growth of a Pressure Group, 1868-1976 (Oxford, 1980), pp. 184-91, 228-33, 255–6Google Scholar. Martin focused on how pressure groups represented unions, and his coverage of Labour party actions was primarily only from that perspective. The creation of the National Joint Council is briefly covered in Allen, V. L., “The Re-organization of the Trades Union Congress, 1918-1927,” British Journal of Sociology 11 (1960):2443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Meeting of trade union members of the NEC, 20 March 1928, in NEC minute book. GC, 28 March 1928; 4 September 1929. The General Council was also formally informed through the NCL of the party's plan to increase the non-union membership on the party executive. NCL, 22 December 1936. GC, 23 December 1936.

9 This theme permeates Martin, TUC, chaps. 7-8; and Beer, Modern British Politics, chaps. 5-6.

10 Martin, , TUC, pp. 85-93, 114-31, 149-54, 184Google Scholar; Roberts, B. C., Trade Union Government and Administration in Great Britain (London, 1956), pp. 397–8Google Scholar; Roberts, B. C., The Trades Union Congress, 1868-1921 (London, 1958), pp. 296–9Google Scholar; Clegg, H. A., Fox, Alan, and Thompson, A. F., A History of British Trade Unions (Oxford, 1964), pp. 406–9Google Scholar; Prochaska, Alice, History of the General Federation of Trade Unions, 1899-1980 (London, 1982), pp. 78-9, 109-12, 121-2, 125–8Google Scholar; Marquand, David, Ramsay MacDonald (London, 1977), pp. 221Google Scholar; White, Stephen, “Labour's Council of Action, 1920,” Journal of Contemporary History 9 (1974): 99122CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Bullock, Bevin, 1:135–42Google Scholar.

11 McKibbin, Ross, The Evolution of the Labour Party, 1910-1924 (Oxford, 1974), pp. 90-106, 124–5Google Scholar; Hamilton, Mary Agnus, Arthur Hamilton: A Biography (London: 1938), pp. 62, 98-101, 170, 208-9, 225–6Google Scholar; and Prochaska, , General Federation of Trade Unions, pp. 109–12Google Scholar.

12 Allen, , “Re-organization of the Trades Union Congress,” pp. 2443Google Scholar.

13 Henderson speech, Memorandum on Labour Party Conference and Trades Union Congress, Coordination Committee, 1920-22, file T15, TUC, NEC, 26 September 1923. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 27 February 1923.

14 Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 4 January 1922; 16 November 1923; and 23 October 1935. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 27 March 1929. Diary, 22 and 23 October 1935, Dalton Diaries and Papers, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). The involvement had been only nominal and it continued unofficially into the 1930s.

15 NEC, 20 October 1920 (includes Memorandum on Co-ordination, n.d.); 17 November 1920; 22 April 1920; 25 May 1921; and 11 July 1921. Reports of Proceedings at the 53rd Annual Trades Union Congress (London, 1921), p. 86Google Scholar (hereafter cited as TUC Reports). Meeting of Joint Coordination Committee, 25 and 31 May 1921, file T15, TUC. Memorandum on Co-ordination: Next Step, from Labour party (Henderson), file TB15, TUC. Note that a few party officials served on the TUC's Parliamentary Committee's “Co-ordination Committee” which was planning the reorganization of the TUC. The new “Joint Co-ordination Committee” in May 1921 had approximately equal representation from the TUC and party. See also Allen, , “Re-organization of the Trades Union Congress,” pp.33–5.Google Scholar

16 Memorandum on National Joint Council (1921), at the beginning of NJC minute book. NJC, 18 November 1921. See Bramley's Memorandum of Proposed Co-ordination Scheme, January 1921, file TB15, TUC.

17 Henderson persuaded the General Council to work through the NJC when the engineering unions attempted to get a government inquiry or parliamentary debate on an engineering dispute. NJC, 9, 15, 16, 21, and 22 March 1922; 4 April 1922; 25 May 1922; and 13 June 1922. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 3 May 1922. The General Council endorsed continued handling by the NJC rather than by the joint meetings of the two executives; GC, 5 April 1922. NEC, 5 April 1922. The NJC originated mediation on a shipbuilding dispute, but its role soon declined. NJC, 4 April 1922. Henderson and the joint Board had been involved in some industrial disputes from the prewar period into the immediate postwar period.

18 «Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 14 December 1921. NJC, 2 February 1922.

19 NJC, 29 September 1922; 9 October 1922; 26 and 28 January 1927; 3, 4, and 18 February 1927; 8 December 1927; 13 June 1922; 18 July 1922; 12 October 1923; and 21 January 1926.

20 GC, 23-24 June 1925; 26-27 January 1926; 22-23 March 1927; and 18 December 1929. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 24 May 1924, in GC minute book. NCL (Summarized report), 24 May 1938. Consultation with PLP, 23 November 1922, in NEC minute book. For the Transportation and General Workers' Union, see Bullock, , Bevin, 1:204Google Scholar. for the NUGMW, see Clegg, H. A., General Union: A Study of the National Union of General and Municipal Workers (Oxford, 1954), pp. 304–9Google Scholar. For the National Union of Railwaymen, see Daily Herald, 27 July 1933, article on Dobbie, W.. Muller, William D., The ‘Kept Men’? The First Century of Trade Union Representation in the British House of Commons, 1874-1975 (Hassocks, Sussex, 1977), pp. 2745Google Scholar; Allen, , Trade Union Leadership, pp. 142–4Google Scholar; Allen, V. L., Trade Unions and the Government (London, 1960), pp. 224–5Google Scholar; Martin, , TUC, p. 196Google Scholar; Pelling, , Short History, p. 54Google Scholar; and McKenzie, , British Political Parties, pp. 409, 418, (fn. 1)Google Scholar.

21 GC, 24 September 1924. Report of the Special Sub-committee, 19 October 1926, file T932, TUC. Minutes of Functions Committee, 20 July and 1 September 1925, file T76, TUC. Joint meeting of chairmen and secretaries of the two national committees, 21 January 1926, in minute book of Joint Meetings of GC/NEC, LPA. TUC Report, 1925, pp. 356-60. See also McKibbin, , Evolution of the Labour Party, pp. 206–21Google Scholar; and Allen, , “Re-organization of the Trade Union Congress,” pp. 34–6Google Scholar.

22 NEC, 26 October 1927; and 29 September 1928. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 26 July 1928.

23 NEC, 12 December 1923. GC. 12 December 1923. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 13 December 1923. There had been the recent wartime episodes of extra-parliamentary organizations providing the endorsement (explicit or implicit) for Henderson to enter or leave the coalition government, for the PLP generally disapproved of his actions. McKenzie, , British Political Parties, pp. 400–5.Google Scholar

24 Allen's, brief criticism of the NJC is misleading, for he implied it had significant potential; Trades Unions and the Government, p. 235Google Scholar.

25 Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 27 March 1924. GC, 27 February 1924. NEC, 26 and 28 March 1924; 28 May 1924; 25 June 1924; and 23 July 1924. Allen, , Trades Unions and the Government, pp. 223–37Google Scholar; Bullock, , Bevin, 1:236–47Google Scholar; and Lyman, Richard W., The First Labour Government, 1924 (London, 1957), pp. 275–7Google Scholar. For the PLP, see McKenzie, , British Political Parties, pp. 429–31Google Scholar.

26 NJC, 21 January 1926; and 27 April 1926. NEC, 28 April 1926. Phillips, G. A., The General Strike: The Politics of Industrial Conflict (New York, 1976), pp. 68, 90-3, 126, 142, 187.Google Scholar

27 The NJC met five times (sometimes for several sessions) between September 1926 and April 1927. The National Trade Union Defence Committee is first mentioned in Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 27 April 1927; and in NEC, 27 April 1927.

28 Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 17 December 1925; 22 June 1927; 27 July 1927, 26 October 1927; and 21 December 1927. NEC, 22 June 1927. GC, 22 February 1927. Martin, , TUC, pp. 223–4Google Scholar; and Phillips, , General Strike, p. 290Google Scholar.

29 Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 17 December 1925; 29 May 1930; 27 November 1930; 19 December 1930; and Report of Conference to Consider the Questions of Joint Consultation (of GC/NEC), 21 January 1930, in Joint Meetings minute book, LPA. Joint Meeting of NEC/PLP ex., 5 June 1929. NEC, 20 May 1930. GC, 22 February 1927; 26 June 1929; and 25 September 1929. For general coverage of Labour government-union relations, see Allen, , Trade Unions and the Government, pp. 239–59Google Scholar; Martin, , TUC, pp. 224–7Google Scholar; and Skidelsky, Robert, Politicians and the Slump: The Labour Government of 1929-1931 (London, 1967), pp. 74, 122-34, 263–70Google Scholar.

30 By Citrine in a speech to Cambridge Union Society, 19 January 1932, 1/1, Citrine Papers, LSE; and by Bevin to the Party, Labour, Report of the 34th Annual Conference (London, 1934), pp. 140–1Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Labour Annual Report).

31 Allen, V. L., Power in Trade Unions: A Study of Their Organization in Great Britain (London, 1954), pp. 188-92, 220Google Scholar; Citrine, , Men and Work, (London, 1964), pp. 236–8Google Scholar. Diary of Beatrice Webb, 22 June 1925; 2 October 1925, LSE; Allen, , Trade Unions and the Government, p. 32Google Scholar; and Martin, , TUC, pp. 194200Google Scholar. By the late 1920s, the General Council's minutes reflect two successful and important subcommittees, the Finance and General Purposes Committee and the Economic Committee.

32 NJC, 27 May 1930. Report of Conference to Consider the Question of Joint Consultation (of GC/NEC), 21 January 1930, in Joint Meetings minute book, LPA. Finance and General Purposes Committee, 10 February 1930, FGPC minutes, TUC. GC, 22 January 1930; and 26 March 1930. The General Council even considered eliminating the PLP representation, perhaps solely to balance the membership but also perhaps because the PLP Consultative Committee was unimportant.

33 Committee minutes records are as follows: Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 20 August 1931. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP Consultative Committee, 26-27 August 1931. GC, 20-21 August 1931; and 16-17 August 1931. Minutes of GC subcommittee and cabinet subcommittee, 20 August 1931, in GC minute book. NEC 26-27 August 1931. Joint Meeting (of GC/NEC/full PLP), 28 August 1931, in Joint Meeting minute book, LPA.

34 Meeting of the Special Committee (on) … Sub-committees, 29 September 1931, file T932, TUC.

35 The General Council now furnished seven members (one being co-chairman) and a secretary, the NEC furnished three members (one being a co-chairman) and a secretary, and the PLP furnished three members and a secretary. The erroneous view that it was the 1931-32 NJC restructuring when the party was weak (rather than 1930 when the party was strong) which increased the General Council's membership to equal that of the party executive and PLP combined is perpetuated in Pimlott, , Labour and the Left, p. 19Google Scholar; Shackleton, Richard, “Trade Unions and the Slump,” in Trade Unions in British Politics, ed. Pimlott, Ben and Cook, Chris (London, 1982), p. 127Google Scholar (both Pimlott and Shackleton also do not include the joint secretaries as members); and Middlemas, Keith, Politics in Industrial Society: The Experience of the British System since 1911 (London: 1979), p. 321Google Scholar.

36 NJC, 7 December 1931; 26 January 1932; 23 February 1932, 22 March 1932; and 26 April 1932. GC, 10 November 1931; 22 December 1931; 24 February 1932. NEC, 10 November 1932; 27 January 1932 (including Joint Meeting of NEC/PLP, 27 January 1932); and 24 February 1932. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC, 10 November 1931. NJC Constitution (n.d., but obviously May 1932), in NEC minute book. Comments of the Labour party (on GC memorandum on NJC), folder 414, Citrine Papers.

37 NJC, 29 June 1932; 5 July 1932; and (NEC) Report, 20 December 1932. Memorandum Regarding Procedures and Functions of the NJC, 21 January 1932, NJC minute book. NEC, 22 June 1932; and 27 July 1933. Joint Meeting of NEC/PLP, 27 January 1932, NEC minute book. Joint Committee on Party Discipline, 11 February 1932; and 18 March 1932, NEC minute book. Policy no. 64, presented to NEC, 22 June 1932. Policy Committee, 21 July 1932; and 21 June 1933, NEC minute book. Labour Annual Report, 1931, pp. 8, 236–7; 1932, pp. 168-9; and 1933; pp. 6, 166-8Google Scholar. Without benefit of the background documents, McKenzie provided a misleading coverage of Clynes's presentation; British Political Parties, pp. 320-3. See Brookshire, Jerry H., “Clement Attlee and Cabinet Reform, 1930-1945,” The Historical Journal 24 (1981): 179-80, 187Google Scholar.

38 See McKenzie, , British Political Parties, pp. 332–4Google Scholar.

39 Meeting of the Special Sub-committee (on) … Sub-committees, 29 September 1931, file T932, TUC.

40 GC, 4 March, 1936.

41 Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 25 August 1939. For the 1938 discussion, see NCL, 27 September 1938; and GC, 28 September 1938.

42 Dalton, Hugh, Memoirs, 3 vols. (London, 1953-1962), 2:87–8Google Scholar; and Dalton diary, 19 February 1936.

43 Donoughe, and Jones, , Morrison, pp. 218, 223-32, 246–7Google Scholar.

44 See Pimlott, Labour and the Left; and Jupp, James, The Radical Left in Britain (London, 1982)Google Scholar.

45 One of Martin's major theses is that the General Council by the 1930s had gained the power to represent the unions before the government on issues affecting more than one union. This power came at the expense of individual unions and of the Labour party (TUC, p. 342).

46 For instance, see GC, 3 September 1936. NCL, (PLP) Report, March 1937.

47 GC, 27 February 1936: and 25 March 1936. NCL, (PLP) Report, 21 April 1936.

48 NJC, 26 April 1932 and (PLP and GC) Report; 31 May 1932; and (PLP and GC) Report, 20 June 1932. TUC Report, 1932, pp. 190-1. 266 House of Commons Debates, 27 May 1932, cols. 715-24. In early 1935, Attlee defended the PLP's actions on health insurance. NCL, 22 January 1935 and (TUC) Report; 26 February 1935.

49 NCL, 22 February 1938.

50 Bevin to Lansbury. 8 March 1933; and Lansbury to Bevin, 9 March 1933, vol. 28, Sec. I, f. 1926, Lansbury Collection, LSE. Postgate, Raymond, The Life of George Lansbury (London, 1951), p. 288.Google Scholar

51 NCL;, 26 May 1936; and 23 February 1937. GC, 24 February 1937. Harris, Kenneth, Attlee (London, 1982), p. 132Google Scholar. Attlee, Clement A., The Labour Party in Perspective (London, 1937), pp. 72–3Google Scholar.

52 See Naylor, Labour's International Policy. Analysis of Labour's ideological concerns is in Gordon, Michael R., Conflict and Concensus in Labour's Foreign Policy, 1914-1965 (Stanford, 1969)Google Scholar.

53 Parker, R. A. C., “British Rearmament, 1936-9: Treasury, Trade Unions and Skilled Labour,” English Historical Review 96 (1981): 306–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Middlemas, , Politics in Industrial Society, pp. 253–8Google Scholar.

54 See Citrine, , Men and Work, pp. 353–4Google Scholar.

55 See Price, John, The International Labour Movement (London, 1945)Google Scholar.

56 This 1933 resolution by Charles Trevelyan precipitated an intense controversy within the party executive, especially since he was elected to it by that conference. NJC, 21 November 1933; 23 January 1934; 27 March 1934; and 24 July 1934. Henderson to Middleton, 17 November 1933, in NJC minute book. Report of Sub-committee on Peace and Freedom Campaign, 16 November 1933, in NJC minute book. Report on Campaign for Peace and Freedom, 23 March 1933, in NJC minute book. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 28 February 1934, in NJC minute book. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 28 June 1934, in GC minute book. GC, 23 May 1934. NEC, 20 December 1933; 27 February 1934; and 27 March 1934. GC memorandum (and appendices) on “War and Peace,” 18 January 1934, in International Committee minute book, box T, 1853, TUC. GC “Memorandum on War and Peace,” 27 June 1934, in Bevin Files, Churchill College, Cambridge. Zilliacus to Cripps, 18 November 1933, folder 515, Cripps Papers, Nuffield College, Oxford. Daily Herald, 6 November 1933. Manchester Guardian, 28 June 1934. Labour Annual Report, 1933, pp. 185–8Google ScholarPubMed. TUC Report, 1932, pp. 358–68; 1933, pp. 296-304Google ScholarPubMed. Dalton, , Memoirs, 2:44–5Google Scholar.

57 See Naylor, , Labour's International Policy, pp. 138-48, 161-5, 182–9Google Scholar.

58 NCL, 21 July 1936; 25 July 1936; 25 August 1936; 27 August 1936; 30 September 1936; 7 October 1936; and 21 October 1936. NCL, 4 October 1936; and 7 October 1936. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 28 August 1936; 4 September 1936; and 9 September 1936, in GC minute book. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 28 October 1936, in NCL minute book. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 9 March 1937, in NEC minute book. Meeting of IFTU General Council, International Trade Secretariats, and LSI Executive, 28 September 1936, IFTU Records, box T494, TUC. In a similar experience the previous year over League of Nations sanctions and the Italian-Ethiopian War, TUC-party liaison was handled primarily by a joint meeting of executives. Bevin gained no support when he tried to use the NCL to force Lansbury's resignation as party leader immediately after their dramatic confrontation at the 1935 party conference. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 3-4 September 1935. NCL, 4 October 1935.

59 NCL, 22 December 1936; 26 January 1937; 23 March 1937 (the General Council alone sent a deputation to the British government over Spain); 23 November 1937; and 21 June 1938. Summarized report of the IFTU executive, 9-10 November 1938, International Committee Papers, T1854, TUC. Labour Annual Report, 1937, pp. 212–7Google ScholarPubMed. Citrine, , Men and Work, pp. 359–60Google Scholar.

60 NCL, 14 May 1935; 3 March 1936; and 5 March 1936. GC, 15 May 1935; 21 May 1935; and 4 March 1936. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP, 21-22 May 1935; and 4 March 1936. Attlee's Memorandum on Votes on Supply, n.d., II, A, 3;1, Dalton Papers. Dalton, , Memoirs, 2:87-90, 133–40Google Scholar. See also Naylor, , Labour's International Policy, pp. 93-8, 151–7Google Scholar.

61 NEC, 9 September 1936; 18 September 1936; 1-2 October 1936; 27 January 1937; 24 February 1937; 23 March 1937; 4 May 1937; 26 May 1937; 23 June 1937; and 28 July 1937. International Sub-committee, 19 February 1937, in NEC minute book. Memorandum on Foreign Policy and Defense (by Dalton), n.d., in NEC minute book. NCL, 24 November 1936, 27 July 1937; and 24 August 1937. See Bullock, , Bevin, 1:590–1Google Scholar; and Naylor, , Labour's International Policy, pp. 157-61, 196202Google Scholar. Naylor incorrectly wrote that an NCL subcommittee drafted the statement, though actually the party executive initiated the draft.

62 NCL, 26 September 1939; 31 March 1941; 27 May 1941; and 22 July 1941.

63 Dalton diary, 10 and 11 May 1940. NCL, 11 May 1940. Joint Meeting GC/NEC/PLP ex., 12 May 1940. NEC, 10, 11, and 12 May 1940. GC, 12 May 1940. Harris, , Attlee, 173–8Google Scholar; and Citrine, , Two Careers (London, 1967), pp. 40–1Google Scholar. Previously, the NCL and joint meetings had allowed some General Council members to oppose ideas of a coalition government, both during the 1938 Austrian crisis and at the outbreak of World War II. Significantly, it was the PLP executive's decision in 1939 not to enter a coalition which was endorsed by the full PLP and NEC. Neither the NCL nor a joint meeting with the General Council was formally involved. Concerning some talk of a coalition following the 1938 Czechoslovakian crisis, Dalton stressed the need to go through the executives and get the unions' support before a coalition was possible. Dalton diary, 8 April 1938; 6 and 11 October 1938; and 24 and 25 August 1939. Notes by Dalton, 2 September 1939, 11, A, 3/2, Dalton Papers. NCL, 22 March 1938. Joint Meeting of NEC/PLP ex., 2 September 1939.

64 NCL, 23 June 1940, 25 February 1941, and 11 March 1941. GC, 12 May 1940; 29-30 January 1941; 4 February 1941; and 26 February 1941. NEC, 26 February 1941. Dalton diary, 11 May 1940. Citrine, , Two Careers, p. 48–9Google Scholar, mildly records some other episodes. Citrine was absent in the United States, however, during those January and early February 1941 meetings over the EPA order.

65 NCL, 31 October 1940; 17 December 1940; 21 January 1940; 27 March 1941; 31 March 1941 (the quotation above); and 22 April 1941. GC, 23 October 1940; 22 January 1941; 29 January 1941; 26 February 1941; 10 April 1941, 23 April 1941, 1 September 1941; 3 September 1941; and 22 July 1942. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 7 May 1941, in NCL minute book. Joint Meeting of GC/PLP, 15 May 1941, in GC minute book.

66 NCL, 21 July 1942. GC, 22 July 1942. Joint Meeting of GC/NEC/PLP ex., 24 May 1944, in GC minute book.

67 NCL, 27 November 1945; 22 January 1946; and 26 February 1946. NCL subcommittee, 11 and 16 January 1946. Phillips to Morrison, 31 October 1945; Phillips to Citrine, 24 January 1946; and Phillips to Whiteley, 30 January 1946, in Miscellaneous folder on NCL, Morgan Phillips Papers, LPA.

68 Middlemas, , Politics in Industrial Society, pp. 372–5Google Scholar.

69 For instance, see Modern British Politics, pp. 211, 352-3, and 389-90; and his Britain Against Itself: The Political Contradictions of Collectivism (New York, 1982), pp. 3-4Google Scholar.

70 Dalton stressed to the government that the NCL represented “many millions of Trade Unionists and electors, and … the alternative Government in this country.” Dalton diary, 25 August 1939.

71 The theme is perhaps best expressed in an early major criticism of it: Miliband, Ralph, Parliamentary Socialism: A Study in the Politics of Labour (New York, 1964), pp. 193–4Google Scholar. A fine analysis of various views on I abour's ideology is presented in Drucker, H. M., Doctrine and Ethos in the Labour Party (London, 1979), pp. 28Google Scholar.

72 An analysis of the methodology of studying British pressure groups is found in Eckstein, Harry, Pressure Group Politics: The Case of the British Medical Association (Stanford, 1960), chap. 1Google Scholar, and Martin, TUC, chap. 1.

73 The NCL was proud of its unity in comparison with the French experience. NCL, 19 and 20 September 1938.