Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T22:13:50.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“An Acre of Land to Plant or a Stick of Wood to Make a Fence or Fire”: An Archaeology of Mohegan Allotment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2024

Craig N. Cipolla*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
James Quinn
Affiliation:
Mohegan Tribal Historic Preservation Office and Archaeology Department, Uncasville, CT, USA
Jay Levy
Affiliation:
Mohegan Tribal Historic Preservation Office and Archaeology Department, Uncasville, CT, USA
*
Corresponding author: Craig N. Cipolla; Email: Craig.Cipolla@tufts.edu

Abstract

Although land loss is among the most profound impacts that settler colonialism had for Indigenous societies across North America, archaeologists rarely study one of the principal colonial mechanisms of land dispossession: allotment. This process forever altered the course of North American history, breaking up collectively held Indigenous lands into lots “owned” by individuals and families while further stressing local Indigenous subsistence patterns, social relations, political organization, and more. Archaeology's long-term, material, and sometimes collaborative vantage stands to offer insights on this process and how it played out for Indigenous peoples in different times and places. As its case study, this article considers the allotment of Mohegan lands in southeastern Connecticut (USA). An archaeology of Mohegan allotment speaks to more than land loss and cultural change. It provides evidence of an enduring and long-term Indigenous presence on the land; of the challenges faced and overcome by Mohegan peoples living through, and with, settler colonialism; and of the nuances of Indigenous-colonial archaeological records. This study also shows the importance of Indigenous and collaborative archaeologies for shedding new light on these challenging but important archaeological traces.

Resumen

Resumen

Aunque la pérdida de tierras es uno de los efectos más profundos que el colonialismo tuvo en las sociedades indígenas de Norteamérica, los arqueólogos raramente estudian uno de los principales mecanismos coloniales de desposesión de tierras: la asignación. Este proceso alteró para siempre el curso de la historia de Norte América, dividiendo las tierras indígenas de propiedad colectiva en lotes “propiedad” de individuos y familias, al tiempo que alteraba aún más las pautas locales de subsistencia, las relaciones sociales y la organización política de los indígenas. La posición ventajosa de la arqueología, a largo plazo, material y a veces colaborativa, permite comprender este proceso y cómo afectó a los pueblos indígenas en diferentes épocas y lugares. En este artículo se estudia el caso de la adjudicación de tierras de los Mohegan en el sureste de Connecticut (Estados Unidos). La arqueología de la adjudicación de los Mohegan habla de algo más que de la pérdida de tierras y el cambio cultural. Aporta pruebas de una presencia indígena duradera y a largo plazo en la tierra, de los retos que afrontan y superan los pueblos Mohegan que viven a través y con el colonialismo, y de los matices de los registros arqueológicos indígenas-coloniales. Este estudio muestra también la importancia de las arqueologías indígenas y colaborativas para arrojar nueva luz sobre estas difíciles pero importantes huellas arqueológicas.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Acebo, Nathan P. 2021. Survivance Storytelling in Archaeology. In The Routledge Handbook of the Archaeology of Indigenous-Colonial Interaction in the Americas, edited by Panich, Lee M. and Gonzalez, Sara L., pp. 468485. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Henry Augustus. 1896. History of Montville, Connecticut, Formerly the North Parish of New London from 1640 to 1896. Case, Lockwood, and Brainard, Hartford, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Barker, David, and Majewski, Teresita. 2006. Ceramic Studies in Historical Archaeology. In The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, edited by Hicks, Dan and Beaudry, Mary C., pp. 205232. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, Dianne F. 2023. Thrivance Is My Identity: Moving beyond Survival. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies 10(4):112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, David L. 1984. Curly Hair and Big Feet: Physical Anthropology and the Implementation of Land Allotment on the White Earth Chippewa Reservation. American Indian Quarterly 8(4):281314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Bethany R., and Scherpa, Chloe. 2022. Mohegan Women, the Mohegan Church, and the Lasting of the Mohegan Nation. Roger Williams University Law Review 27(2):211254.Google Scholar
Boudreau, Jeff. 2008. A New England Typology of Native American Projectile Points. Handbook edition. Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Middleboro.Google Scholar
Brooks, Joanna. 2006. The Collected Writings of Samson Occom, Mohegan: Leadership and Literature in Eighteenth-Century America. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brousseau, Marcel. 2018. Allotment Knowledges: Grid Spaces, Home Places, and Storyscapes on the Way to Rainy Mountain. Native American and Indigenous Studies 5(1):136167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, David J., and Eastman, Charles. 2001. “Indian for a While”: Charles Eastman's “Indian Boyhood” and the Discourse of Allotment. American Indian Quarterly 25(4):604625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, Alfred A. 1996. The Pequot War. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.Google Scholar
Cipolla, Craig N. 2013a. Becoming Brothertown: Native American Ethnogenesis and Endurance in the Modern World. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Cipolla, Craig N. 2013b. Native American Historical Archaeology and the Trope of Authenticity. Historical Archaeology 47(3):1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, Craig N., and Quinn, James. 2016. Field School Archaeology the Mohegan Way: Reflections on Twenty Years of Community-Based Research and Teaching. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage 3(2):118134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, Craig N., Quinn, James, and Levy, Jay. 2019. Theory in Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology: Insights from Mohegan. American Antiquity 84(1):127142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, Craig N., Quinn, James, and Levy, Jay. 2021. Territorializing Whiteness: An Archaeology of Boy Scout Simulations. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 8(2):185206.Google Scholar
Cipolla, Craig N., Quinn, James, Levy, Jay, and Ferguson, Kelly. 2024. Replanting Archaeology: Learning from Plants at Mohegan. In What End for Epistemology in Archaeology? Indigenous Knowledges, Ontology, and Axiology in Archaeological Research, edited by Abadía, Oscar Moro, Pollard, Kelly, Marek-Martinez, Ora, Cipolla, Craig N., and Gonzalez, Sara. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, in press.Google Scholar
Deloria, Vine Jr., and Lytle, Clifford M.. 1983. American Indians, American Justice. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Genetin-Pilawa, C. Joseph. 2012. Crooked Paths to Allotment: The Fight over Federal Indian Policy after the Civil War. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Haake, Claudia B. 2015. Appeals to Civilization and Customary “Forest Diplomacy”: Arguments against Removal in Letters Written by the Iroquois, 1830–1857. Wicazo Sa Review 30(2):100128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilliard, Tabitha C. 2013. Telling Time with Equines: A Study of Bridle Bits. Master's thesis, Departments of History and Anthropology, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Holm, Tom. 1979. Indian Lobbyists: Cherokee Opposition to the Allotment of Tribal Lands. American Indian Quarterly 5(2):115134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Brad D. E. 2010. The Brothertown Nation of Indians: Land Ownership and Nationalism in Early America, 1740–1840. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Johnson, Zachary. 1779. Petition of Zachary Johnson. Yale Digital Collections. https://hdl.handle.net/10079/digcoll/2943, accessed April 11, 2024.Google Scholar
Johnson, Zachary. 1780. Memorial of Zachary Johnson. Yale Digital Collections. https://findit.library.yale.edu/bookreader/BookReaderDemo/index.html?oid=10682292#page/1/mode/1up, accessed January 6, 2023.Google Scholar
Johnson, Zachary. 1782. Memorial of Zachary Johnson. Yale Digital Collections. https://hdl.handle.net/10079/digcoll/2956, accessed April 11, 2024.Google Scholar
Justice, Daniel H., and O'Brien, Jean M.. 2021. Introduction: What's Done to the People Is Done to the Land. In Allotment Stories: Indigenous Land Relations under Settler Siege, edited by Justice, Daniel H. and O'Brien, Jean M., pp. xixxviii. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Kauanui, J. Kēhaulani. 2016. “A Structure, Not an Event”: Settler Colonialism and Enduring Indigeneity. Lateral 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25158/L5.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeler, Kasey. 2016. Putting People Where They Belong: American Indian Housing Policy in the Mid-Twentieth Century. Native American and Indigenous Studies 3(2):70104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzler, Ian. 2022. “I Can Tell It Always”: Confronting Expectations of Native Disappearance through Collaborative Research. In Archaeologies of Indigenous Presence, edited by Schneider, Tsim D. and Panich, Lee M., pp. 2547. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Lambert, Valerie. 2016. The Big Black Box of Indian Country: The Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Federal–Indian Relationship. American Indian Quarterly 40(4):333363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaVelle, John P. 1999. The General Allotment Act “Eligibility” Hoax: Distortions of Law, Policy, and History in Derogation of Indian Tribes. Wicazo Sa Review 14(1):251302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Stacy L. 2021. Afterword: Indigenous Foresight under Duress and the Modern Applicability of Allotment Agreements. In Allotment Stories: Indigenous Land Relations under Settler Siege, edited by Justice, Daniel H. and O'Brien, Jean M., pp. 302306. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Kent G., and Gonzalez, Sara L.. 2018. The Study of Sustained Colonialism: An Example from the Kashaya Pomo Homeland in Northern California. American Antiquity 83(3):427443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomawaima, K. Tsianina. 2013. The Mutuality of Citizenship and Sovereignty: The Society of American Indians and the Battle to Inherit America. American Indian Quarterly 37(3):333351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Kevin A. 1990. The Historical Archaeology of the Mashantucket Pequots, 1637–1900: A Preliminary Analysis. In The Pequots in Southern New England: The Fall and Rise of an American Indian Nation, edited by Hauptman, Laurence M. and Wherry, James D., pp. 96116. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Miller, George L., and Hunter, Robert. 2001. How Creamware Got the Blues: The Origins of China Glaze and Pearlware. In Ceramics in America, edited by Hunter, Robert, pp. 135161. Chipstone Foundation, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Mohegan, Tribe. 1836. Petition of John Tantaquidgeon and Others to Divide Tribal Lands. Yale Indian Papers Project. https://findit.library.yale.edu/yipp/catalog/digcoll:2786368, accessed July 27, 2023.Google Scholar
Mohegan, Tribe. 2023. Medicine Women of the 20th Century. Electronic document, https://www.mohegan.nsn.us/about/our-tribal-history/ceremonial-leaders/medicine-women-of-the-20th-century, accessed October 20, 2023.Google Scholar
Noël-Hume, Ivor. 2001. A Guide to Artifacts of Colonial America. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Panich, Lee M., and Schneider, Tsim D.. 2022. Introduction: Archaeology, Unknowing, and the Recognition of Indigenous Presence in Post-1492 North America. In Archaeologies of Indigenous Presence, edited by Schneider, Tsim D. and Panich, Lee M., pp. 124. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Parker, Angela. 2015. Photographing the Places of Citizenship: The 1922 Crown Industrial Survey. Native American and Indigenous Studies 2(2):5786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Tsim D., and Panich, Lee M. (editors). 2022. Archaeologies of Indigenous Presence. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silliman, Stephen W. 2009. Change and Continuity, Practice and Memory: Native American Persistence in Colonial New England. American Antiquity 74(2):211230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silliman, Stephen W., and Witt, Thomas A.. 2010. The Complexities of Consumption: Eastern Pequot Cultural Economics in Eighteenth-Century New England. Historical Archaeology 44(4):4668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, David J. 2010. Red Brethren: The Brothertown and Stockbridge Indians and the Problem of Race in Early America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Smithers, Gregory D. 2015. “This Is the Nation's Heart-String”: Formal Education and the Cherokee Diaspora during the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Wicazo Sa Review 30(2):2855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tantaquidgeon, Gladys. 1972. Folk Medicine of the Delaware and Related Algonkian Indians. Anthropological Series No. 3. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg.Google Scholar
Tong, Benson. 1997. Allotment, Alcohol, and the Omahas. Great Plains Quarterly 17(1):1933.Google Scholar
Veracini, Lorenzo. 2011. Introducing Settler Colonial Studies. Settler Colonial Studies 1(1):112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voss, Barbara L. 2015. The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Race and Sexuality in Colonial San Francisco. Rev. ed. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Michael V. 2009. The Pueblo Revolt and the Mythology of Conquest: An Indigenous Archaeology of Contact. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Mary E. 1958. Indian Removal and Land Allotment: The Civilized Tribes and Jacksonian Justice. American Historical Review 64(1):3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar