Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T20:29:27.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeomagnetic Dating in the American Southwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeffrey L. Eighmy ,
Robert S. Sternberg  and
Robert F. Butler
Jeffrey L. Eighmy
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Robert S. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Robert F. Butler
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although archaeomagnetic dating seems straightforward in principle, there are practical limitations which are not generally understood. Unlike rate-dependent processes such as isotopic dating, archaeomagnetic dating requires the construction of a master record of geomagnetic secular variation. Error is inherent in such a master curve due to statistical uncertainties regarding both the magnetic directions and ages of the samples used to create the curve. The master curve itself is thus best represented as a ribbon rather than a line. Features being dated have their own error of measurement of magnetic direction, and deriving a date involves an interpretation based on the relation between the oval of confidence for the unknown and the ribbon representing the master curve. Thus a practical precision limit for archaeomagnetic dating is about ± 20 years under optimal circumstances, but the limit will generally be higher. Our pilot study revealed no major discrepancies between our work and the curves of DuBois (1975).

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 1980 , pp. 507 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aitken, M. J. 1970 Dating by archaeomagnetic and thermoluminescent methods. Philosophical Transactions of thefloyal Society of London 269:77-78.Google Scholar
Bucha, V. 1971 Archaeomagnetic dating. In Dating techniques for the archaeologist, edited by Michael, H. N. and Ralph, E. K., pp. 57-117. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dean, J. S. 1978 Independent dating in archaeological analysis. In Advances in archaeological method and theory(vol. I), edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 223-255. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Du Bois, R. L. 1975 Secular variation in southwestern United States as suggested by archaeomagnetic studies. In Takesi Nagata Conference—magnetic fields: past and present, edited by Fischer, R. M., Fuller, M., Schmidt, V. A., and Wasilewski, P. J., pp. 133-144. Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.Google Scholar
Eighmy, J. L. 1979 Archeomagnetism: a handbook for the archeologist. Cultural Resource Management Studies, Interagency Archeological Services Division, Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation, U. S. Departmentof the Interior.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. 1953 Dispersion on a sphere. Proceedings of Royal Society of London A217:295-305.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1976 The Hohokam: desert farmers and craftsmen. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Irving, E. 1964 Paleomagnetism. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
McElhinny, M. W. 1973 Paleomagnetism and plate tectonics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shuey, R. T., Cole, E. R., and Mikulich, M. J. 1970 Geographic correction of archeomagnetic data. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity 22:485-489.Google Scholar
Tarling, D. H. 1975 Archaeomagnetism: the dating of archaeological materials by their magnetic properties. World Archaeology 7(2):185-197.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. 1977 Archaeomagnetic dating in Compounds A & B, Casa Grande Ruins National Monument. MS. on file, Western Archaeological Center, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Wolfman, D. 1973 A reevaluation of Mesoamerican chronology A. D. 1-1200. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Departmentof Anthropology, University of Colorado.Google Scholar