Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T11:27:10.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chronological Position of the Cambered Jar at Cahokia and Its Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patricia J. O'Brien
Patricia J. O'Brien*
Affiliation:
Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cambered rim jar is stylistically unique and should be especially useful as a time indicator if its place in Cahokia's ceramic history can be ascertained. On the basis of the broken-down interlocking scroll motif, a parallel line motif, and the scalloped rim found on some of these vessels, it is suggested that this vessel form occurs in periods III and IV of the basic ceramic sequence established for the Powell Tract section of the Cahokia site. It is further suggested that at Powell, late in period III and early in period IV, we have approximately the same time range as at the Mitchell site, whose radiocarbon dates cluster about A.D. 1000-1200.

Finally, the similarities between the cambered rim jar at Cahokia and the S-shaped rim types in the Cambria and Mill Creek manifestations to the northwest of Cahokia suggest not only a sharing of ceramic ideas, but also contemporaneity between these three cultural groups during late period III and early period IV times as reflected in the Powell Tract sequence. These relationships would date in calendric years ca. A.D. 1000-1200. Furthermore, this vessel form probably represents a borrowing of ceramic notions on the part of the potters of Cahokia because the form (the S-shaped rim) is both old and widespread in the Central Plains and Middle Missouri regions, while it is rare or missing in the widespread Middle Mississippian manifestations in the Southeast.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 411 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fowler, Melvin L. 1962 Radiocarbon Assays. In First Annual Report: American Bottoms Archaeology, July 1, 1961–June 30, 1962, pp. 49–57. Urbana.Google Scholar
Fowler, Melvin L. 1963 Radiocarbon Assays. In Second Annual Report: American Bottom Archaeology, July 1, 1962–June 30, 1963, pp. 46–52. Urbana.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1960 A Hypothesis for the Prehistory of the Winnebago. In Culture in History, Essays in Honor of Paul Rodin, edited by Stanley Diamond, pp. 809–65. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Gunnerson, James H. 1961 Some Nebraska Culture Pottery Types. Plains Archaeological Conference News Letter, Vols. 5 and 6, No. 1, pp. 34–44. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert L. 1966 Cahokia Chronology. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the Central States Anthropological Society in St. Louis, Missouri, 1966. (mimeographed)Google Scholar
Hall, Robert L. 1967 The Mississippian Heartland and Its Relationship. Plains Anthropologist, Vol. 12, No. 36, pp. 175–83. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Henning, Dale R. 1967 Mississippian Influences on the Eastern Plains Border: An Evaluation. Plains Anthropologist, Vol. 12, No. 36, pp. 184–94. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Ives, John Chester 1962 Mill Creek Pottery. Journal of the Iowa Archaeological Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 5–59. Iowa City.Google Scholar
Knudson, Ruth Ann 1967 Cambria Village Ceramics. Plains Anthropologist, Vol. 12, No. 37, pp. 247–99. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Lehmer, Donald J. and Caldwell, Warren W. 1966 Horizon and Tradition in the Northern Plains. American Antiquity, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 511–16. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Menzel, Dorothy, Rowe, John H., and Dawson, Lawrence E. 1964 The Paracas Pottery of lea, A Study in Style and Time. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 50. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Munson, Patrick J. 1966 Midwestern Dendrochronology and Archaeological Dating. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 241–5. Springfield.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Patricia J. 1969 A Formal Analysis of Cahokia Ceramics: Powell Tract. MS, doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Richter, Gisela M. A. 1946 Attic Red-Figured Vases, A Survey. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Rowe, John H. 1959 Archaeological Dating and Cultural Process. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol 15, No. 4, pp. 317–24. Albuquerque.10.1086/soutjanth.15.4.3628895 Google Scholar
Wedel, Waldo 1961 Prehistoric Man on the Great Plains. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Wilford, Lloyd A. 1945 Three Village Sites of the Mississippi Pattern in Minnesota. American Antiquity, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 32–40. Menasha.Google Scholar
Witty, Thomas A. Jr. 1967 The Pomona Focus. Kansas Anthropological Association, Newsletter, Vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 1–5. Topeka.Google Scholar