Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:37:25.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comment on Nomenclature in Faunal Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sandra L. Olsen  and
John W. Olsen
Sandra L. Olsen
Affiliation:
Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
John W. Olsen
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of faunal remains from archaeological sites has been described using a variety of terms including: zooarchaeology, archaeozoology, osteoarchaeology, and ethnozoology. With such a broad spectrum of terms in current usage, we feel that the contradictions and errors inherent in some of this nomenclature need to be corrected. We prefer the term zooarchaeology, as a contraction of the word zoologico-archaeology proposed by Lubbock in 1865, to define the study of animal remains from archaeological sites and their relationship to humans.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 192 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Baker, F. C. 1941 A study of ethnozoology of the prehistoric Indians of Illinois. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 32(1):51–77.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1978 Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Byrd, K. M. 1976 Prehistoric Caribbean fishing: a zooarchaeological analysis. Florida Journal of Anthropology 1(1):11–20.Google Scholar
Chaplin, R. E. 1971 The study of animal bones from archaeological sites . Seminar Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D. and Haynes, C. V., Jr. 1970 An elephant butchery site at Mwanganda's village, Karonga, Malawi, and its relevance for Paleolithicarchaeology. World Archaeology 1(3):390–411.Google Scholar
Clason, A. T. (editor) 1975 Archaeozoological studies. North Holland, Amsterdam and American Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Cleland, C. E. 1966 The prehistoric animal ecology and ethnozoology of the upper Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers No. 29.Google Scholar
Gilbert, B. M. 1973 Mammalian osteo-archaeology: North America. Missouri Archaeological Society, University of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
Harris, S. 1977 Spinal arthritis (spondylosis deformans) in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), with some methodology ofrelevance to zooarchaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 4(2):183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J., and Harrington, J. P. 1914 Ethnozoology of the Tewa Indians. Bulletin 56, Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. (Lord, Avebury) 1865 Prehistoric times, as illustrated by ancient remains, and the manners and customs of modernsavages, first edition. Williams and Norgate, London and Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. 1976 A cultural analysis of fauna! remains from the Alpowa locality . Unpublished M. A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. J. 1971 Zooarchaeology: animal bones in archaeology and their interpretation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Oxford University Press 1971 The compact edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. 2 volumes. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P. W., and Hoffmeister, D. F. 1957 Archaeo-zoological evidence of the spotted skunk in Illinois. Journal of Mammalogy 38(2):261.Google Scholar
Reed, C. A. 1963 Osteo-archaeology. In Science in archaeology, edited by Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E., pp. 204–216. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, H-P. 1973 Animal bone finds and economic archaeology: a critical study of osteo-archaeology method. World Archaeology 4(3):307–322.Google Scholar
Yellen, J. E. 1977 Cultural patterning in faunal remains: evidence from the !Kung Bushmen. In Experimental archaeology, edited by Ingersoll, D. W., Yellen, J. E., and Mac Donald, W., pp. 271–331. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar