Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:36:49.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cultural Transmission of Great Basin Projectile-Point Technology II: An Agent-Based Computer Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Alex Mesoudi  and
Michael J. O'Brien
Alex Mesoudi
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Rd., London El 4NS, UK (a.mesoudi@qmul.ac.uk)
Michael J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 (obrienm@missouri.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present an agent-based computer simulation that extends a previous experimental simulation (Mesoudi and O"Brien 2008) of the cultural transmission of projectile-point technology in the prehistoric Great Basin, with participants replaced with computer-generated agents. As in the experiment, individual learning is found to generate low correlations between artifact attributes, whereas indirectly biased cultural transmission (copying the point design of the most successful hunter) generates high correlations between artifact attributes. These results support the hypothesis that low attribute correlations in prehistoric California resulted from individual learning, and high attribute correlations in prehistoric Nevada resulted from indirectly biased cultural transmission. However, alternative modes of cultural transmission, including conformist transmission and random copying, generated similarly high attribute correlations as indirect bias, suggesting that it may be difficult to infer which transmission rule generated this archaeological pattern. On the other hand, indirect bias out-performed all other cultural-transmission rules, lending plausibility to the original hypothesis. Importantly, this advantage depends on the assumption of a multimodal adaptive landscape in which there are multiple locally optimal artifact designs. Indeed, in unimodal fitness environments no cultural transmission rule outperformed individual learning, highlighting how the shape of the adaptive landscape within which cultural evolution occurs can strongly influence the dynamics of cultural transmission. Generally, experimental and computer simulations can be useful in answering questions that are difficult to address with archaeological data, such as identifying the consequences of different modes of cultural transmission or exploring the effect of different selective environments.

Résumé

Résumé

Presentamos una simulación por computadora basada en agentes que es una extensión del anterior experimento de simulación (Mesoudi y O'Brien 2008) de transmisión cultural de la tecnología prehistórica de puntas de proyectil en la Gran Cuenca. En esta simulación los participantes son reemplazados por agentes generados por computadora. Como en el experimento, el aprendizaje individual genera bajas correlaciones entre los atributos de los artefactos, mientras que en una transmisión cultural sesgada indirecta (copiar el diseño de la punta del cazador más exitoso) genera altas correlaciones entre los atributos de los artefactos. Esto apoya la hipótesis de que bajas correlaciones en los atributos en la California prehistórica resultan del aprendizaje individual, y que las altas correlaciones en los atributos en la Nevada prehistórica son consecuencia de la transmisión cultural sesgada indirecta. Sin embargo, modos alternativos de transmisión cultural como la transmisión conformista y la imitación aleatoria generan correlaciones altas, en forma similar a las del sesgo indirecto, lo cual sugiere que tal vez sea difícil inferir cuál regla de transmisión generó este patrón arqueológico. Por otro lado, el sesgo indirecto supera todas las otras reglas de transmisión cultural, lo cual da verosimilitud a la hipótesis original. Es importante subrayar que esta ventaja depende de suponer un entorno multimodal adaptativo, en el cual haya múltiples diseños de artefactos localmente óptimos. En efecto, en un entorno de ajuste unimodal, ninguna regla de transmisión cultural superó al aprendizaje individual, destacando así cómo la forma del entorno adaptativo dentro del cual la evolución cultural ocurre, puede influir fuertemente en la dinámica de transmisión cultural. Por lo general, simulaciones experimentales y por computadora pueden ser útiles para contestar preguntas que son difíciles de abordar con información arqueológica, como identificación de las consecuencias de los diferentes modos de transmisión cultural o de exploración de los efectos de los diferentes ambientes de selección.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 627 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aoki, Kenichi, Wakano, Joe Y., and Feldman, Marcus W. 2005 The Emergence of Social Learning in a Temporally Changing Environment: A Theoretical Model. Current Anthropology 46:334–340.Google Scholar
Arnold, Stevan J., Pfrender, Michael E., and Jones, Adam G. 2001 The Adaptive Landscape as a Conceptual Bridge between Micro and Macroevolution. Genetica 112–113:9–32.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert 1997 The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:203–226.Google Scholar
Barton, C. Michael, and Clark, Geoffrey A. (editors) 1997 Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory in Archeological Explanation. Archeological Papers, No. 7, American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Bentley, R. Alexander, and Shennan, Stephen J. 2003 Cultural Transmission and Stochastic Network Growth. American Antiquity 68:459–485.Google Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L., and Baumhoff, Martin A. 1982 The Numic Spread: Great Basin Cultures in Competition. American Antiquity 47:485–503.Google Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L., and Eerkens, Jelmer 1997 Evolutionary Implications of Metrical Variation in Great Basin Projectile Points. In Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory in Archeological Explanation, edited by C. Michael Barton and Geoffrey A. Clark, pp. 177–191. Archeological Papers, No. 7, American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L., and Eerkens, Jelmer 1999 Point Typologies, Cultural Transmission, and the Spread of Bow-and-Arrow Technology in the Prehistoric Great Basin. American Antiquity 64:231–242.Google Scholar
Bleed, Peter 2001 Trees or Chains, Links or Branches: Conceptual Alternatives for Consideration of Stone Tool Production and Other Sequential Activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 8:101–127.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J. 1985 Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J. 1992 How Microevolutionary Processes Give Rise to History. In Evolution and History, edited by Michael Nitecki. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J. 1995 Why Does Culture Increase Human Adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology 16:125–143.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca, and Feldman, Marcus W. 1981 Cultural Transmission and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheshier, Joseph, and Kelly, Robert L. 2006 Projectile Point Shape and Durability: The Effect of Thickness:Length. American Antiquity 71:353–363.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles 1859 On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection; or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Murray, London.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Robin I. M. 1995 Neocortex Size and Group Size in Primates: A Test of the Hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution 28:287–296.Google Scholar
Eerkens, Jelmer W., Bettinger, Robert L., and McElreath, Richard 2006 Cultural Transmission, Phylogenetics, and the Archaeological Record. In Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Methods in Anthropology and Prehistory, edited by Carl P. Lipo, Michael J. O’Brien, Mark Collard, and Stephen J. Shennan, pp. 169–183. Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
Eerkens, Jelmer W., and Lipo, Carl P. 2005 Cultural Transmission, Copying Errors, and the Generation of Variation in Material Culture and the Archaeological Record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24:316–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eerkens, Jelmer W., and Lipo, Carl P. 2007 Cultural Transmission Theory and the Archaeological Record: Providing Context to Understanding Variation and Temporal Changes in Material Culture. Journal of Archaeological Research 15:239–274.Google Scholar
Epstein, Joshua M., and Axtell, Robert 1996 Growing Artificial Societies. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, and Boyd, Robert 1998 The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences. Evolution and Human Behavior 19:215–241.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, and Gil White, Francisco J. 2001 The Evolution of Prestige. Evolution and Human Behavior 22:165–196.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 1992 Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kameda, Tatsuya, and Nakanishi, Daisuke 2002 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social/Cultural Learning in a Nonstationary Uncertain Environment: An Evolutionary Simulation and an Experiment with Human Subjects. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:373–393.Google Scholar
Kameda, Tatsuya, and Nakanishi, Daisuke 2003 Does Social/Cultural Learning Increase Human Adaptability? Rogers’ Question Revisited. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:242–260.Google Scholar
Kohler, Timothy A., and Gumerman, George J. (editors) 2000 Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kohler, Timothy A., Kresl, James, Van West, Carla, Carr, Eric, and Wilshusen, Richard H. 2000 Be There Then: A Modeling Approach to Settlement Determinants and Spatial Efficiency among Late Ancestral Pueblo Populations of the Mesa Verde Region, U.S. Southwest. In Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies: Agent-Based Modeling of Social and Spatial Processes, edited by Timothy A. Kohler and George J. Gumerman, pp. 145–178. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kohler, Timothy A., VanBuskirk, Stephanie, and Ruscavage-Barz, Samantha 2004 Vessels and Villages: Evidence for Conformist Transmission in Early Village Aggregations on the Pajarito Plateau, New Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 23:100–118.Google Scholar
Laland, Kevin N. 2004 Social Learning Strategies. Learning and Behavior 32:4–14.Google Scholar
Lande, Russell 1986 The Dynamics of Peak Shifts and the Pattern of Morphological Evolution. Paleobiology 12:343–354.Google Scholar
Lipo, Carl P., Madsen, Mark E., Dunnell, Robert C., and Hunt, Tim 1997 Population Structure, Cultural Transmission, and Frequency Seriation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 16:301–333.Google Scholar
Lipo, Carl P., O’Brien, Michael J., Collard, Mark, and Shennan, Stephen (editors) 2006 Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. Lee, and O’Brien, Michael J. 1998 The Goals of Evolutionary Archaeology: History and Explanation. Current Anthropology 39:615–652.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst 1982 The Growth of Biological Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex 2007 Using the Methods of Social Psychology to Study Cultural Evolution. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology 1:35–58.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex 2008 The Experimental Study of Cultural Transmission and Its Potential for Explaining Archaeological Data. In Cultural Transmission and Archaeology: Issues and Case Studies, edited by Michael J. O’Brien, pp. 91–101. The SAA Press, Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex, and O’Brien, Michael J. 2008 The Cultural Transmission of Great Basin Projectile Point Technology I: An Experimental Simulation. American Antiquity 73:3–28.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex, Whiten, Andrew, and Laland, Kevin N. 2004 Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of The Origin of Species . Evolution 58:1–11.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex, Whiten, Andrew, and Laland, Kevin N. 2006 Towards a Unified Science of Cultural Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:329–383.Google Scholar
Neiman, Fraser D. 1995 Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Inferences from Decorative Diversity and Interassemblage Distance in Illinois Woodland Ceramic Assemblages. American Antiquity 60:7–36.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin, and Sigmund, Karl 1993 A Strategy of Win-Stay, Lose-Shift That Outperforms Tit-for-Tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Nature 364:56–58.Google Scholar
Oaksford, Mike, and Chater, Nick 2001 The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:349–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, Michael J. (editor) 1996 Evolutionary Archaeology: Theory and Application. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Michael J., and Lee Lyman, R. 2000 Applying Evolutionary Archaeology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Michael J., and Lee Lyman, R. 2002 Evolutionary Archeology: Current Status and Future Prospects. Evolutionary Anthropology 11:26–36.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Michael J., and Lee Lyman, R. 2003a Editors. Style, Function, Transmission. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Michael J., and Lee Lyman, R. 2003b Cladistics and Archaeology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Michael J., Lee Lyman, R., Collard, Mark, Holden, Claire J., Gray, Russell D., and Shennan, Stephen J. 2008 Transmission, Phylogenetics, and the Evolution of Cultural Diversity. In Cultural Transmission and Archaeology: Issues and Case Studies, edited by Michael J. O’Brien, pp. 39–58. Society for American Archaeology Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J., and Boyd, Robert 2005 Not by Genes Alone. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Shennan, Stephen J. 2002 Genes, Memes and Human History. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Shennan, Stephen J., and Wilkinson, James R. 2001 Ceramic Style Change and Neutral Evolution: A Case Study from Neolithic Europe. American Antiquity 66:577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, George G. 1944 Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Skinner, Burrhus F. 1938 The Behavior of Organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar