Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T17:58:28.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic Opal Phytoliths from Pods of Selected Varieties of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven R. Bozarth
Steven R. Bozarth*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerous distinctly hooked silicified hairs are produced in pods of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Similar phytoliths were found in six dicot species native to the central Great Plains in an extensive reference collection of both cultivated and wild plants. Statistical analysis demonstrates that many of the hooked hairs produced in common beans are significantly wider near the tip than those produced in the other species. Bean phytoliths were identified at a late prehistoric village in central Kansas based on this distinguishing characteristic.

Résumé

Résumé

Gran número de distintos filamentos curvados silicificados son producidos en la vainas de frijol comun (Phaseolus vulgaris). En una extensa colección de referenda tanto de plantas cultivadas como silvestres, fueron encontrados fitolitos similares en seis especies de dicotiledoneas provenientes de los Grandes LLanos centrales. Análisis estadísticos demuestran que muchos de los filamentos curvados producidos en frijol comunes se localizan ampliamente cerca del extremo de la vaina, más que en otros especies. Basado en esta característica distinguible, fueron identificados fitolitos defrijol en una comunidad prehistórica en u estado de Kansas central (E.E.U.U.)

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 98 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adair, M. J. 1988 Prehistoric Agriculture in the Central Plains. Publications in Anthropology 16. University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Barkley, T. M. (editor) 1977 Atlas of the Flora of the Great Plains. The Great Plains Flora Association, Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Barkley, T. M. (editor) 1986 Flora of the Great Plains. The Great Plains Flora Association, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Bonnett, O. T. 1972 Silicified Cells of Grass: A Major Source of Plant Opal in Illinois Soils. Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 742. University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Bozarth, S. R. 1985 Distinctive Phytoliths from Various Dicot Species. Paper presented at the 2nd Phytolith Conference, University of Minnesota, Duluth.Google Scholar
Bozarth, S. R. 1986 Morphologically Distinctive Phaseolus, Cucurbita, and Helianthus Annus Phytoliths. In Plant Opal Phytolith Analysis in Archaeology and Paleoecology, edited by Rovner, I., pp. 56–66. Occasional Papers No. 1. The Phytolitharien, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
Brown, D. A. 1984 Prospects and Limits of a Phytolith Key for Grasses in the Central United States. Journal of Archaeological Science 11: 345–368.Google Scholar
Brydon, J. E., Dore, W. G., and Clark, J. S. 1963 Silicified Plant Asterosclereids Preserved in Soil. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 27: 476–477. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Evans, A. M. 1976 Beans: Phaseolus spp. (Leguminosae-Papilionae). In Evolution of Crop Plants, edited by Simmonds, N. W., pp. 168–172. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Geis, J. W. 1973 Biogenic Silica in Selected Species of Deciduous Angiosperms. Soil Science 116: 113–119.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L. 1965 Archeology and Domestication in American Phaseolus (Beans). Economic Botany 19: 358–368.Google Scholar
Klein, R. L., and Geis, J. W. 1978 Biogenic Silica in the Pinaceae. Soil Science 126(3): 145–155.Google Scholar
Norgren, J. 1973 Distribution, Form and Significance of Plant Opal in Oregon Soils. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Piperno, D. R. 1988 Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological Perspective. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Rovner, I. 1971 Potential of Opal Phytoliths for Use in Paleoecological Reconstruction. Quaternary Research 1: 343–359.Google Scholar
Rovner, I. 1972 Note on a Safer Procedure for Opal Phytolith Extraction. Quaternary Research 2: 591.Google Scholar
Rovner, I. 1975 Plant Opal Phytolith Analysis in Midwestern Archaeology. Michigan Academician 8: 129–137.Google Scholar
Suess, E. 1966 Opal Phytoliths. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Geology and Geography, Kansas State University, Manhattan.Google Scholar
Twiss, P. C, Suess, E., and Smith, R. M. 1969 Morphological Classification of Grass Phytoliths. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 33: 109–115. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Wilding, L. P., and Drees, L. R. 1971 Biogenic Opal in Ohio Soils. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of A merica 35: 1004–1010. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar