Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T13:28:04.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Twining to Triple Cloth: Experimentation and Innovation in Ancient Peruvian Weaving (ca. 5000-400 B.C.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

S. J. Doyon-Bernard
S. J. Doyon-Bernard*
Affiliation:
Department of Art, The University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL 32514
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A chronological sequence for the introduction of the major categories of loom weaves in the Initial period and Early Horizon of prehistoric Peru reveals a process of experimentation that begins with primarily suprastructural and discontinuous decoration and culminates with the achievement of designs that are wedded materially to the weave. Three major innovations allowed for this dramatic advance: (1) the use of multiple heddles, which is found surprisingly early in the sequence; (2) the recognition of the full potential of the “cross” to vary the selection of the warps from the fixed order in the heddles, and (3) the related application of the complementary principle, in which one colored yarn is substituted for its partner in a contrasting hue. Through the elaboration of these truly revolutionary discoveries, the last limits to artistic freedom were removed and weaving technology rapidly advanced to include the full repertoire of loom-weave classes known in the Andes.

Résumé

Résumé

Una serie cronológica, anotando la introducción de cada categoría mayor de textiles telados durante la Epoca Inicial y el Horizonte Temprano del Perú prehistórico, revela un proceso de experimentatión con la nueva tecnología del telar, el que empieza con la decoratión hecha principalmentepor hilos suplementarios o discontínuos, y culmina con la ejecución de diseños en los cuales los hilos forman parte material de la confección básica del tejido. Tres inovaciones importantes permitieron este desarrollo dramático: (1) el uso de lizos múltiples, que aparecen asombrosamente temprano en la serie; (2) el reconocimiento de que elpunto donde se cruzan las urdimbres (“el cruce”) puede servir para escoger hilos particulares, y así variar el ordenfijado en los lizos; y (3) el empleo de una práctica conexa, el principio complementario, en que un hilo Colorado está substituido por su pareja de tinte opuesto. Gracias a la elaboratión de esos descrubrimientos realmente revolutionaries, los últimos obstáculos técnicos fueron eliminados, el espíritu artístico fué emancipado, y la tecnología del telar se desarrollo rápidamente hasta que llego a dominar el repertorio completo del telar conocido en los Andes.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 68 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Albers, A. 1965 On Weaving. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Bird, J. B. 1948 Preceramic Culture in Chicama and Viru. In A Reappraisal of Peruvian Archaeology, edited by Bennett, W. C., pp. 21–28. SAA Memoirs No. 4. Society for American Archaeology, Menasha, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Bird, J. B. 1952 Before Heddles Were Invented. Handweaver and Craftsman 3(3): 5–8, 45, 50.Google Scholar
Bird, J. B. 1953 Two Guatemalan Wedding Huipils. The Bulletin of the Needle and Bobbin Club 37(l-2): 26–36.Google Scholar
Bird, J. B. 1960 Techniques: Textiles. In Andean Culture History. 2nd rev. ed., edited by Bennett, W. C. and Bird, J. B., pp. 257–293. Handbook Series No. 15. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Bird, J. B. 1963 Preceramic Art from Huaca Prieta, Chicama Valley. Nawpa Pacha 1: 29–34.Google Scholar
Bird, J. B., and Bellinger, L. 1954 Paracas Fabrics and Nazca Needlework, 3rd Century B. C. -3rd Century A. D.: The Textile Museum, Catalogue Raisonne. Textile Museum, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Bird, J. B., Hyslop, J., and Skinner, M. D. 1985 The Preceramic Excavations at the Huaca Prieta, Chicama Valley, Peru. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History Vol. 62. New York.Google Scholar
Bird, J. B., and Mahler, J. 1951-1952 America's Oldest Cotton Fabrics. American Fabrics 20: 73–78.Google Scholar
Cahlander, A. 1985 Double-Woven Treasures from Old Peru. Dos Tejedoras, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Cason, M., and Cahlander, A. 1976 The Art of Bolivian Highland Weaving. Watson-Guptill, New York.Google Scholar
Conklin, W. J. 1971 Chavin Textiles and the Origins of Peruvian Weaving. Textile Museum Journal 3(2): 13–19.Google Scholar
Conklin, W. J. 1975a An Introduction to South American Archaeological Textiles with Emphasis on Materials and Techniques of Peruvian Tapestry. In Archaeological Textiles: Irene Emery Roundtable on Museum Textiles Proceedings, edited by Fiske, P. L., pp. 17–30. Textile Museum, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Conklin, W. J. 1975b Pampa Gramalote Textiles. In Archaeological Textiles: Irene Emery Roundtable on Museum Textiles edited by Fiske, P. L., pp. 77–92. Textile Museum, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Conklin, W. J. 1979 The Revolutionary Weaving Inventions of the Early Horizon. Nawpa Pacha 16: 1–12.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. D. C. 1916 Peruvian Fabrics. In Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 12, edited by Wissler, C., pp. 105–191. New York.Google Scholar
d'Harcourt, R. 1962 Textiles of Ancient Peru and Their Techniques. Translated by Brown, S. and edited by Denny, G. G. and M, C.. Osborne. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
Donnan, C. B. 1964 An Early House from Chilca, Peru. American Antiquity 30: 137–144.Google Scholar
Doyon-Bernard, S. J. 1980 The Fiber Arts and the Chavin Style: Foundations oj the Ancient Peruvian Aesthetic. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Art History, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
Dwyer, E. B. 1979 Early Horizon Tapestry from South Coastal Peru. In The Junius B. Bird Pre-Columbian Textile Conference, edited by Rowe, A. P., Benson, E. P. and Schaffer, A. -L., pp. 61–82. Textile Museum and Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Emery, I. 1980 The Primary Structures of Fabrics: An Illustrated Classification. 2nd ed. Textile Museum, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Engel, F. 1960 Un Groupe Humain Datant de 5000 Ans a Paracas, Perou. Journal de la Societe des Americanistes 49: 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, F. 1963 A Preceramic Settlement on the Central Coast of Peru: Asia, Unit 1. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society Vol. 53, Pt. 3. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Engel, F. 1964 El preceramico sin algodon en la costa del Peru. Adas y Memorias, 35 Congreso Internacional de Americanistas 3: 141–152. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Engel, F. 1966 Paracas, Cien Sighs de Cultura Peruana. Libreria-Editorial Juan Mejia Baca, Lima.Google Scholar
Engel, F. 1976 An Ancient World Preserved. Translated by Gordon, R. K. Crown, New York.Google Scholar
Gayton, A. H. 1961 Early Paracas Style Textiles from Yauca, Peru. Archaeology 14(2): 117–121.Google Scholar
Gayton, A. H. 1967 Textiles from Hacha, Peru. Nawpa Pacha 5: 1–23.Google Scholar
Goldberg, P. and Orcutt, C. 1979 Appendix: Technical Analysis of the Chucho Textiles. In The Junius B. Bird Pre-Columbian Textile Conference, edited by Rowe, Ann Pollard, Benson, Elizabeth P. and Schaffer, Anne-Louise, pp. 76–81. Textile Museum and Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Grieder, T. and Mendoza, A. Bueno 1981 La Galgada: Peru before Pottery. Archaeology 34(2): 44–51.Google Scholar
King, M. E. 1965a Ancient Peruvian Textiles form the Collection of the Textile Museum, Washington, D. C. Museum of Primitive Art, New York.Google Scholar
King, M. E. 1965b Textiles and Basketry of the Paracas Period, lea Valley, Peru. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
King, M. E. 1969 Some New Paracas Techniques from Ocucaje. Verhandlungen des XXXVIII Internationalen Amerikanistenkongress 1: 369–377.Google Scholar
Lanning, E. P. 1967 Peru Before the Incas. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Moseley, M. E. 1975 The Maritime Foundations of Andean Civilization. Cummings, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
Moseley, M. E., and Willey, G. R. 1973 Aspero, Peru: A Reexamination of the Site and its Implications. American Antiquity 38: 452–468.Google Scholar
O. Neale, L. M. 1942 Textile Periods in Ancient Peru: II, Paracas Caverns and the Grand Necropolis. In University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, vol. 39, edited by Kroeber, A. L., Lowie, R. H., Gilford, E. W., McCown, T. D., and Olson, R. L., pp. 143–202. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
O. Neale, L. M. 1946 Mochica (Early Chimu) and Other Peruvian Twill Fabrics. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 2: 269–294.Google Scholar
O. Neale, L. M. 1954 Textiles. In Early Ancon and Early Supe Culture: Chavin Horizon Sites of the Central Peruvian Coast, edited by Willey, G. R. and Corbett, J. M., pp. 84–130. Columbia Studies in Archeology and Ethnology, Vol. 3. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
O. Neale, L. M., and Kroeber, A. L. 1930 Textile Periods in Ancient Peru. In University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, vol. 28, edited by Kroeber, A. L., Lowie, R. H., and Olson, R. L., pp. 23–56. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Rowe, A. P. 1977 Warp-Patterned Weaves of the Andes. Textile Museum, Washington, D. C. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, A. P. 1984 After Emery: Further Considerations of Fabric Classification and Terminology. The Textile Museum Journal 23: 53–71.Google Scholar
Rowe, A. P. 1985 Two-Faced Triple Cloth. In Double-Woven Treasures from Old Peru, edited by Cahlander, A. and Baizerman, S., pp. 12–14. Dos Tejedoras, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Tidball, H. 1969 Peru Textiles Unlimited, Part II. Monograph 26. Shuttle Craft Guild, Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar
Vallejos A., M. 1981 Analisis y Tipologia de los Textiles de Paloma: Un Pueblo de 7000 ahos en las Lomas de Chilca, Peru. Centro de Investigaciones de Zonas Aridas, Departamento de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Nacional Agraria, Lima.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. T. 1962 Cerrillos, an Early Paracas Site in lea, Peru. American Antiquity 27: 303–314.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. T. 1975 The Analysis of Weaving Patterns: Examples from the Early Periods in Peru. In Archaeological Textiles: Irene Emery Roundtable on Museum Textiles, 1974 Proceedings, edited by Fiske, P. L., pp. 101–116. Textile Museum, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Wallace, D. T. 1979 The Process of Weaving Development on the Peruvian Coast. In The Junius B. Bird Pre-Columbian Textile Conference, edited by Rowe, A. P., Benson, E. P., and Schaffer, A. -L., pp. 27–50. Textile Museum and Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Willey, G. R., and Corbett, J. M. 1954 Early Ancon and Early Supe Culture: Chavin Horizon Sites of the Central Peruvian Coast. Columbia Studies in Archeology and Ethnology Vol. 3. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar