Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-28T16:24:34.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Growth of Archaeology in the West Coast and the Great Basin, 1935-60*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Clement W. Meighan
Clement W. Meighan*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological research in the Far West of North America is reviewed in terms of the contributions to methodology and theory. The generally simple level of culture in an area in which functioning native cultures survived until recent times has led to the perfection of analytical techniques for non-ceramic evidence, the development of ingenuity in deriving conclusions, and a considerable use of the direct-historical approach. New methodological approaches have been developed in analysis of physical components of sites, determination of food resources, estimation of population density, establishment of functional typologies, testing of the value of chemical and other changes for chronological control, and experimentation with statistical techniques of seriation. Theoretical trends include a lack of culture classification systems comparable to those in other North American areas, a dependence on classificatory units on the level of the complex or assemblage, and a tendency toward the development of a classificatory system based on an ecological framework.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1961 , pp. 33 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Presented in a symposium, Twenty-five Years of American Archaeology, at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, May 6, 1960, New Haven, Connecticut.

References

Ascher, Marcia 1959 A Mathematical Rationale for Graphical Sedation. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 212–4. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ascher, Robert 1959 A Prehistoric Population Estimate Using Midden Analysis and Two Population Models. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 168–78. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Baumhoff, M. A. 1958 Ecological Determinants of Population. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 41, pp. 34–41. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Baumhoff, M. A., Heizer, R. F., and Elsasser, A. B. 1958. The Lagomarsino Petroglyph Group (Site 26–St–1) near Virginia City, Nevada. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 43, Part 2. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Belous, R. E. 1953 The Central California Chronological Sequence Re-examined. American Antiquity, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 341–53. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Bennyhoff, J. A. 1951 The Viru Valley Sequence: A Critical Review. American Antiquity, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 231–49. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Borden, C. E. 1954 Some Aspects of Prehistoric Coastal-Interior Relations in the Pacific Northwest. Anthropology in British Columbia, No. 4, pp. 26–32. Victoria.Google Scholar
Brainerd, G. W. 1951 The Place of Chronological Ordering in Archaeological Analysis. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 301–13. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S., Olson, E. A., and Orr, P. C. 1960 Radiocarbon Measurements and Annual Rings in Cave Formations. Nature, Vol. 185, No. 4706, pp. 93–4. London.Google Scholar
Carter, G. F. 1956 On Soil Color and Time. Southwestern lournal of Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 295–324. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D. 1952 Prehistoric Europe: The Economic Basis. Philosophical Library, New York.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D. 1956 Star Carr, a Mesolithic Site in Yorkshire. In Recent Archaeolgoical Excavations in Britain, edited by Bruce-Mitford, R. L. S., pp. 1–20. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. 1946 A Reconsideration of Shellmounds with Respect to Population and Nutrition. American Antiquity, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 50–3. Menasha.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. 1950 Physical Analysis as a Method for Investigating Prehistoric Habitation Sites. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 7, pp. 2-5. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. and Heizer, R. F. 1951 The Physical Analysis of Nine Indian Mounds of the Lower Sacramento Valley. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 40, pp. 281–312. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. and Heizer, R. F. 1952 The Fossilization of Bone: Organic Components and Water. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 17. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. and Heizer, R. F. 1953 Archaeological Dating by Chemical Analysis of Bone. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 231–8. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. and Treganza, A. E. 1947 The Quantitative Investigation of Aboriginal Sites: Comparative Physical and Chemical Analysis of two California Indian Mounds. American Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 135–41. Menasha.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. and Treganza, A. E. 1950 The Quantitative Investigation of Indian Mounds. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 40, pp. 223–62. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cressman, L. S. 1956 Klamath Prehistory. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s. Vol. 46, Part 4. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Dixon, K. A. 1956 Archaeological Objectives and Artifact Sorting Techniques: A Re-examination of the Snaketown Sequence. Western Anthropology, No. 3. Berkeley (?).Google Scholar
Fenenga, Franklin 1953 The Weights of Chipped Stone Points: a Clue to their Functions. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 309–23. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. W. and Humphrey, R. R. 1959 Growth Rings of Sagebrush Reveal Rainfall Records. Progressive Agriculture in Arizona, Vol. 11, No. 2, p. 3. Tucson.Google Scholar
Gilman, A. T. 1961 Excavations at Goleta, Part 5: Specialized Power Equipment in Archaeological Work. Annual Report of the University of California Archaeological Survey, Los Angeles, 1960–61, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Greengo, R. E. 1951 Molluscan Species in California Shell Middens. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 13. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Harradine, Frank 1953 Report on Pedologic Observations made at the Capay Man Site in Western Yolo County. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 22, p. 27. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. 1958 Prehistoric Central California: A Problem in Historical-Developmental Classification. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 41, pp. 19–26. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Krieger, A. D. 1956 The Archaeology of Humboldt Cave, Nevada. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 47, No. 1. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. D. 1957 Danger Cave. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 14. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, J. D. and Norbeck, Edward 1955 Great Basin Prehistory: A Review. American Antiquity, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1–11. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1936 Prospects in California Prehistory. American Antiquity, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 108–16. Menasha.Google Scholar
McKusick, M. B. 1961 Excavations at Goleta, Part 1: Methodology. Annual Report of the University of California Archaeological Survey, Los Angeles, 1960–61. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. W. 1950 Observations on the Efficiency of Shovel Archaeology. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 7, pp. 15-21. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. W. 1959a California Cultures and the Concept of an Archaic Stage. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 289–305. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. W. 1959b The Little Harbor Site, Catalina Island: An Example of Ecological Interpretation in Archaeology. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 383–405. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. W. 1959c A New Method for the Seriation of Archaeological Collections. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 203–11. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Osborne, Douglas, Caldwell, W. W., and Crabtree, R. H. 1956 The Problem of Northwest Coastal — Interior Relationships as Seen from Seattle. American Antiquity, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 117–28. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1951 A Method for Chronologically Ordering Archaeological Deposits. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 293–301. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Smith, M. W. 1956 The Cultural Development of the Northwest Coast. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 272–94. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Storie, R. E. and Harradine, Frank 1950 An Age Estimate of the Burials Unearthed Near Concord, California, Based on Pedologic Observations. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 9, pp. 15–9. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Treganza, A. E. and Cook, S. F. 1948 The Quantitative Investigation of Aboriginal Sites: Complete Excavation with Physical and Archaeological Analysis of a Single Mound. American Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 287–97. Menasha.Google Scholar