Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T16:48:31.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hermeneutics and Archaeology: On the Philosophy of Contextual Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Harald Johnsen  and
Bjørnar Olsen
Harald Johnsen
Affiliation:
Institute of Social Science, University of Tromso, 9000 Tromso, Norway
Bjørnar Olsen
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Tromse Museum, University ofTromso, 9000 Tromso, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we situate and discuss critically Ian Hodder's contextual archaeology in relation to a broader tradition of philosophical hermeneutics. We argue that Hodder's position comes close to the romantic conception of interpretation developed by German philosophers and historians. Central to this position is the equation of meaning and intention, context and origin, making historical understanding a transaction between the creative consciousness of the prehistoric agents and the receptive or reconstructive consciousness of the archaeologist. Drawing on Gadamer's critique of early hermeneutics we argue that Hodder's contextual archaeology disregards the dialectic between past and present horizons, a dialectic embedded in past material culture itself lying before us as present traces of a past.

Resumen

Resumen

En este artóculo situamos y analizamos críticamente la arqueología contextual de Ian Hodder en relación con una tradición más amplia de hermenéutica filosófka. Sostenemos que la posición de Hodder se encuentra próximo a la concepción romántica de interpretación desarrollada por filósofos e historiadores alemanes. Un elemento central de esta perspectiva es la equiparación de intención y signifwado, origen y contexto, que convierte a la comprehensión histórica en una transacción entre la consciencia creativa de los agentes prehistóricos y la consciencia receptiva o reconstructiva del arqueólogo. Basándonos en la crítica de la herméneutica formulada por Gadamer, sostenemos que la arqueología contextual de Hodder ignora la dialéctica entre horizontes pasados y presentes, una dialéctica inherente a la cultura material delpasado que se encuentra enfrente nuestro como rastro presente de un pasado.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , July 1992 , pp. 419 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference Cited

Apel, K. O. 1986 Scientists, Hermeneutics, Critique of Ideology: An Outline of a Theory of Science from an Epistemological-Anthropological Point of View. In The Hermeneutics Reader, edited by Mueller-Vollmer, K., pp. 321-345. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barret, J. 1987a Fields of Discourse: Reconstituting a Social Archaeology. Critique of Anthropology 7: 5-16.Google Scholar
Barret, J. 1987b Contextual Archaeology. Antiquity 61: 468-173.Google Scholar
Bell, J. 1987 Rationality Versus Relativism: A Review of “Reading the Past. ” Archaeological Review from Cambridge 6: 75-86.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. 1983 Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1972 An Archaeological Perspective. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1983 Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1987 Data, Relativism and Archaeological Science. Man 22: 391-404.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G. 1949 Social Worlds of Knowledge. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L. 1968 Analytical Archaeology. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1946 The Idea of History. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1986 The Understanding of Other Persons and Their Life-Expressions. In The Hermeneutics Reader, edited by Mueller-Vollmer, K., pp. 152-164. Basil Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
Droysen, J. G. 1977 Historik. Band I: Rekonstruktion der ersten voll-standigen Fassung der Vorlesungen (1857) Grundriss der Historik. Edited by Leyh, P.. Fromann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Droysen, J. G. 1986 History and the Historical Method. In The Hermeneutics Reader, edited by Mueller-Vollmer, K., pp. 119-124. Basil Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
Fritz, J. M., and Plog, F. T. 1970 The Nature of Archaeological Explanation. American Antiquity 35: 405-412.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. 1975 Truth and Method. Sheed and Ward, London.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. 1977 Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated and edited by Linge, D.. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1983 Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1987 Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1986 On Hermeneutics’ Claim to Universality. In The Hermeneutics Reader, edited by Mueller-Vollmer, K., pp. 294-319. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1962 Being and Time. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982a Theoretical Archaeology: A Reactionary View. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 1-16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982b Symbols in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1985 Postprocessual Archaeology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 1-26. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986 Reading the Past. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1987a The Contextual Analysis of Symbolic Meanings. In The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 1-10. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1987b Digging for Symbols in Science and History: A Reply. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 53: 352-356.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1987c The Contribution of the Long Term. In Archaeology as Long-Term History, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 1-8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1987d Reading Bell Reading “Reading the Past. ” Archaeological Review from Cambridge 6: 87-91.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1989a Post-modernism, Post-structuralism and Post-processualism. In The Meanings of Things, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 64-78. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1989b This is Not an Article About Material Culture as Text. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 250-269.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1990a The Domestication of Europe. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1990b Archaeology and the Post-modern. Anthropology Today 6(5): 13-15.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991a Interpretative Archaeology and Its Role. American Antiquity 56: 7-18.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991b Postprocessual Archaeology and the Current Debate. In Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies. Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, edited by Preucel, R. W., pp. 30-41. Occasional Papers No. 10. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Johanessen, K. 1985 Tradisjoner og skoler i moderne vitenskaps-filosofi. Sigma forlag, Bergen.Google Scholar
Kohl, P. L. 1981 Material Approaches in Prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology 10: 89-118.Google Scholar
Lentricchia, F. 1983 After the New Criticism. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Leone, M. P. 1982 Some Opinions About Recovering Mind. American Antiquity 47: 742-760.Google Scholar
Lindseth, A. 1981 Forstaelsens prosess: et stadig oppgj0r med vare for-dommer. Om Hans-Georg Gadamers filosofi. Dyade 4: 4-28.Google Scholar
Linge, D. E. 1977 Editor's Introduction. In Philosophical Hermeneutics, by Gadamer, H. G., edited by Linge, D. E., pp. xi-lviii. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Melas, E. M. 1989 Etics, Emics and Empathy in Archaeological Theory. In The Meanings of Things, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 137-155. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (editors) 1984 Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mueller-Vollmer, K. (editor) 1986 The Hermeneutics Reader. Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
Olsen, B. 1990 Roland Barthes: From Sign to Text. In Reading Material Culture, edited by Tilley, C., pp. 163-205. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. 1989 History and the Post-processual Archaeologies. Man 24: 555-566.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1981 Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Edited and translated by Thompson, J.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Saari, H. 1984 Re-enactment. A Study in R. G. Collingwood's Philosophy of History. Abo Akademi, Abo.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1976 Behavioral Archeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1988 The Structure of Archaeological Theory. American Antiquity 53: 461-485.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. D. E. 1986 General Hermeneutics. In The Hermeneutics Reader, edited by Mueller-Vollmer, K., pp. 73-86. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. 1987a Re-constructing Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. 1987b Social Theory and Archaeology. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. 1989 Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review 22(1): 1-12.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. (editor) 1990 Reading Material Culture. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. 1989 A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vico, G. 1961 The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Anchor Books, New York,Google Scholar
von Humboldt, W. 1986 On the Task of the Historian. In The Hermeneutics Reader, edited by Mueller-Vollmer, K., pp. 105-118. Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
Warnke, G. 1988 Gadamer. Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, R. 1981 A Heidegger Critique. A Critical Examination of the Existential Phenomenology of Martin Heidegger. Harvester Press, Sussex.Google Scholar
Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., and Redman, C. L. 1971 Explanation in Archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Winch, P. 1963 The Idea of a Social Science. Routhledge, London.Google Scholar
Wind, H. 1976 Filosofisk hermeneutik. Berlingske forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1989 Archaeological Cables and Tacking: The Implications of Practice for Bernstein's “Options Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. ” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19: 1-18.Google Scholar
Yates, T. 1990 Jacques Derrida: ‘There is Nothing Outside of the Text. $ In Reading Material Culture, edited by Tilley, C., pp. 206-280. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar