Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-7r68w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-04T12:28:05.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Logical Sequence of Archaeological Objectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

B. K. Swartz Jr.
B. K. Swartz Jr.*
Affiliation:
Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of seven idealized levels of procedure in conducting archaeological research is proposed: preparation, acquisition, analysis, interpretation, integration, comparison, and abstraction. This scheme was employed to investigate archaeological phenomena from Lava Beds National Monument, northern California.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , October 1967 , pp. 487 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascher, Robert 1961a Analogy in Archaeological Interpretation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 317–25. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Ascher, Robert 1961b Experimental Archeology. American Anthropologist, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 793–816. Menasha.Google Scholar
Beals, Ralph L. and Hester, James A. Jr. 1960 A New Ecological Typology of the California Indians. Selected Papers of the Fifth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Science, edited by Anthony F. C. Wallace, pp. 411–19. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidwood, Robert J. 1946 Terminology in Prehistory. Human Origins, Ser. 2, 2nd ed., No. 14. Chicago.Google Scholar
Brainerd, George W. 1951 The Place of Chronological Ordering in Archaeological Analysis. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 301–13. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Brew, J. O. 1946 The Archaeology of Alkali Ridge, Southwestern Utah. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 21. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Childe, V. Gordon 1956 Man Makes Himself, 3rd ed. Watts, London.Google Scholar
Childe, V. Gordon 1960 What Happened in History, rev. ed. Parrish, London.Google Scholar
Daugherty, Richard D. 1962 The Methodology of Typology. Paper delivered at the First Conference of Western Archaeologists on Problems of Point Typology, Pocatello.Google Scholar
Fosberg, F. R. 1960 Plant Collecting as an Anthropological Field Method. El Palacio, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 125–39. Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Hawley, Florence M. 1937 Reverse Stratigraphy. American Antiquity, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 297–9. Menasha.Google Scholar
Hayden, Julian D. 1965 Fragile-Pattern Areas. American Antiquity, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 272–6. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert F. 1953 Long-Range Dating in Archaeology. In Anthropology Today, edited by A. L. Kroeber, pp. 3–42. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert F. 1958 A Guide to Archaeological Field Methods, 3rd rev. ed. National Press, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert F. (Editor) 1962 Man’s Discovery of His Past. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Hester, James J. 1962 A Comparative Typology of New World Cultures. American Anthropologist, Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 1001–15. Menasha.Google Scholar
Krieger, Alex D. 1944 The Typological Concept. American Antiquity, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 271–88. Menasha.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1917 The Superorganic. American Anthropologist, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 163–213. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1935 History and Science in Anthropology. American Anthropologist, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 539–69. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, Ralph 1936 The Study of Man. Appleton-Century Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
McKern, W. C. 1939 The Midwestern Taxonomic Method as an Aid to Archaeological Culture Study. American Antiquity, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 301–13. Menasha.Google Scholar
Mayer-Oakes, William J. 1966 Towards a Theoretical Framework for Doing Archaeology. MS, in possession of author, Ball State University, Muncie.Google Scholar
Meggers, betty J. 1954 Environmental Limitation of the Development of Culture. American Anthropologist, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 801–24. Menasha.Google Scholar
Oakley, Kenneth P. 1948 Fluorine and Relative Dating of Bones. The Advancement of Science, Vol. 4, No. 16, pp. 336–7. London.Google Scholar
Olson, Alan P. 1962 A History of the Phase Concept in the Southwest. American Antiquity, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 457–72. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Osgood, Cornelius 1942 The Ciboney Culture of Cayo Redondo, Cuba. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 25. New Haven.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip, Ford, J. A., and Griffin, J. B. 1951 Archaeological Survey of the Lower Mississippi Valley 1940-1947. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 25. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reed, Erik K. 1958 Excavation in Mancos Canyon, Colorado. University of Utah Anthropological Papers, No. 35. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1965 The Archaeology of New York State. Natural History Press, Garden City.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1951 A Method for Chronological Ordering Archaeological Deposits. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 293–301. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving 1939 Prehistory in Haiti: A Study of Method. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 21. New Haven.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving 1953 The Strategy of Culture History. In Anthropology Today, edited by A. L. Kroeber, pp. 57–76. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving 1960 The Classification of Artifacts in Archaeology. American Antquity, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 313–23. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Irving 1965 The Place of “Peoples” in Prehistoric Research. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 95, Pt. 1, pp. 1–15. London.Google Scholar
Rowe, John Howland 1961 Stratigraphy and Seriation. American Antiquity, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 324–30. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Barton M. 1961 Logistical Accounting for Archaeological Expeditions. In “Excavations at Goleta.” Archaeological Survey Annual Report 1960-1961, pp. 433–45. Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Semenov, S. A. 1964 Prehistoric Technology. Cory, Adams and Mackay, London.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O. 1956 Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 609. Washington.Google Scholar
Smiley, Terah L. 1955 The Geochronological Approach to Temporal Problems. In “Geochronology,” edited by Terah L. Smiley, pp. 15–28. Physical Science Bulletin, No. 2. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1953 Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types. American Antiquity, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 305–13. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1960 Statistical Description and Comparison of Artifact Assemblages. In “The Application of Quantitative Methods in Archaeology,” edited by Robert F. Heizer and Sherburne F. Cook, pp. 60–92. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 28. Chicago.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian H. 1942 The Direct Historical Approach to Archaeology. American Antiquity, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 337–43. Menasha.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian H. 1954 Types of Types. In “On the Concept of Types,” by J. A. Ford. American Anthropologist, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 54–7. Menasha.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian H. 1955 Theory of Culture Change. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian H. and Seltzer, Frank 1938 Function and Configuration in Archaeology. American Antiquity, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 4–10. Menasha.Google Scholar
Swartz, B. K. Jr. 1964 Archaeological Investigations at Lava Beds National Monument, California. MS, doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Swartz, B. K. Jr. 1965 A Suggested Standardization of Nomenclature in Archaeological Methodology. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science for 1964, Vol. 74, pp. 114–17. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Swartz, B. K. Jr. 1967 Archaeological Investigations at Lava Beds National Monument, California: A Study of Objectives. Occasional Papers of the Idaho State University Museum. Pocatello. (in press)Google Scholar
Taylor, Walter W. 1948 A Study of Archeology. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, No. 69. Menasha.Google Scholar
Taylor, Walter W. (Editor) 1957 The Identification of Non-Artifactual Materials. National Research Council, Publication 565. Washington.Google Scholar
Thompson, Raymond H. 1958 Modern Yucatecan Maya Pottery-Making. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 15. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Trigger, Bruce G. 1967 Settlement Archaeology — Its Goals and Promise. American Antiquity, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 149—60. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
White, Leslie A. 1949 The Science of Culture. Farrar, Straus, New York.Google Scholar
White, Theodore E. 1952 Observations on the Butchering Technique of Some Aboriginal Peoples: No. 1. American Antiquity, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 337–8. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
White, Theodore E. 1953 Observations on the Butchering Technique of Some Aboriginal Peoples: No. 2. American Antiquity, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 160–4. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
White, Theodore E. 1954 Observations on the Butchering Technique of Some Aboriginal Peoples: Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6. American Antiquity, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 254–64. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1953 Prehistoric Settlement Patterns of the Virú Valley, Peru. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 155. Washington.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. and Phillips, Philip 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wissler, Clark 1923 Man and Culture. Thomas Y. Crowell, New York.Google Scholar