Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:46:04.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Hawikku Cemetery Kin Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert S. Corruccini
Robert S. Corruccini*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4502
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Howell and Kintigh (1996) argue for ascribed leadership at Hawikku based on biological kinship within cemetery areas and nonrandom distribution of higher-diversity burials. Their statistical evidence could be questioned based on principles of two-tailed null hypotheses, the Bonferroni principle, and other aspects. Especially when taking the bioanthropological literature more adequately into account, alternate conclusions somewhat at variance with Howell and Kintigh's concerning biological and social patterning according to gender could be envisioned.

Résumé

Résumé

Howell y Kintigh (1996) arguyen la ascripción del liderato en Hawikku, basados en el parentesco biológico dentro de las áreas del cementerio y la distribución de una más alta diversidad de entierros no hechos al azar. Su evidencia estadística podría ser cuestionada basada en los principios de las dos hipótesis nulas de limitación, el principio Bonferroni, y otros aspectos. Especialmente cuando se toma en cuenta más adecuadamente la literatura bioantropológica, conclusiones alternas que de alguna manera están en desacuerdo con los patrones biológico y social asociados con el género, que Howell y Kintigh proponen, podrian visualizarse.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 161 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bartel, B. 1980 Collective Burial and Social Organization: A Multivariate Analysis of Human Population from Early Bronze Age Western Turkey. Journal of Mediterranean Anthropology and Archaeology 1: 3–21.Google Scholar
Bondioli, L., Corruccini, R. S., and Macchiarelli, R. 1986 Familial Segregation in the Iron-Age Community of Alfedena, Abruzzo, Italy, Based on Osteo-Dental Trait Analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 71: 393–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corruccini, R. S. 1972 The Biological Relationships of Some Prehistoric and Historic Pueblo Populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 37: 373–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corruccini, R. S., Handler, J. S., Mutaw, R. J., and Lange, F. W. 1982 Osteology of a Slave Burial Population from Barbados, West Indies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 59: 443–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Najjar, M. Y. 1978 Southwestern Physical Anthropology: Do the Cultural and Biological Parameters Correspond? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 48: 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, T. L., and Kintigh, K. W. 1996 Archaeological Identification of Kin Groups Using Mortuary and Biological Data: An Example from the American Southwest. American Antiquity 61: 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdlicka, A. 1931 Catalogue of Human Crania in the U.S. National Museum Collections. Pueblos, Southwestern Utah Basketmakers, Navajos. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 78: 1–95. Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konigsberg, L. W. 1988 Migration Models of Prehistoric Postmarital Residence. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 77: 471–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, R. A., and Sublett, A. J. 1972 Osteology of Social Organization: Residence Pattern. American Antiquity 37: 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, D. J., and Corruccini, R. S. 1976 The Skeletal Biology of the Virginia Indians. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 45: 717–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owsley, D. W., and Jantz, R. L. 1978 Intracemetery Morphological Variation in Arikara Crania from the Sully Site (39SL4), Sully County, South Dakota. Plains Anthropologist 23: 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prowse, T. L., and Lovell, N. C. 1996 Concordance of Cranial and Dental Morphological Traits and Evidence for Endogamy in Ancient Egypt. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 101: 237–246.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sjovold, T. 1984 A Report on the Heritability of Some Cranial Measurements and Non-Metric Traits. In Multivariate Statistical Methods in Physical Anthropology, edited by van Vark, G. N. and Howells, W. W., pp. 223–246. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, M. W. 1974 Residential Practices and the Distribution of Skeletal Traits in Teotihuacan, Mexico. Man 9: 262–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strouhal, E., and Jungwirth, J. 1979 Paleogenetics of the Late Roman-Early Byzantine Cemeteries at Sayala, Egyptian Nubia. Journal of Human Evolution 8: 699–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar