Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T02:08:42.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pre-Pottery Faulkner Site of Southern Illinois

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Richard S. MacNeish
Richard S. MacNeish*
Affiliation:
Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, April, 1947
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As an introduction to the problem of pre-pottery culture in Illinois, it seems best to review briefly discoveries made previous to the excavation at the Faulkner site. The first such manifestation was reported by Langford at the Fisher site. The burials in the gravel deposits, lower level, were noted by him to have been without pottery and of a physical type different than that in pottery-bearing sites. In 1931 it was mentioned that Kelly had unearthed fire basins of considerable geological antiquity at Plum Island. Simpson and Shoenbeck have excavated similar fire basins in a shell mound in Woodford County. Both finds are considered to be earlier than the use of pottery. The Folsom points found in Illinois are also thought to be of considerable age. In a surface survey of the Carbondale area, Moreau Maxwell located sites which produced large flint knives, bannerstones, straight-stemmed points, quantities of flint chips, but no pottery.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , January 1948 , pp. 232 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cole, Fay-Cooper, and Deuel, Thorne 1935. Rediscovering Illinois. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, Charles H. 1942. “The Taxonomic Position of Stalling's Island, Georgia.” AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 223-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, James A., and Quimby, George I. 1945. “The Tchefuncte Culture, an Early Occupation of the Lower Mississippi Valley.” Memoirs of the Society por American Archaeology, No. 2.Google Scholar
Kelly, Arthur R., and Cole, Fay-Cooper 1931. “Rediscovering Illinois.” Blue Book of the State of Illinois. Springfield.Google Scholar
Langford, George 1927. “The Fisher Mound Group, Successive Aboriginal Occupations Near the Mouth of the Illinois River.” American Anthropologist, N.S., Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 153–204. Menasha.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1940. “Two Prehistoric Village Sites at Brewerton, New York.” Researches and Transactions, New York State Archaeological Association, Vol. 9, No. 1. Rochester.Google Scholar
Roberts, Frank H. H. Jr. 1940. “Developments in the Problem of the North American Paleo-Indian.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 100, pp. 51–116. Washington.Google Scholar
Van Male, William C 1936. “An Interesting Anthropological Find from the Lake Michigan Region.” Transactions, Illinois Academy of Science, Vol. 29. Urbana.Google Scholar
Webb, William S. 1946. “Indian Knoll, Site Oh 2, Ohio County, Kentucky.” University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology, Vol. 4, No. 3, Pt. 1. Lexington.Google Scholar
Webb, William S., and Dejarnette, David L. 1942. “An Archaeological Survey of Pickwick Basin.” Bulletin, Bureau of American Ethnology, No. 122. Washington.Google Scholar
Webb, William S., and Haag, William G. 1939. “The Chiggerville Site, Site 1, Ohio County, Kentucky.” University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology, Vol. 4, No. 1. Lexington.Google Scholar
Webb, William S., and Haag, William G. 1940. “The Cypress Creek Village, Sites 11 and 12.” University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology, Vol. 4, No. 2. Lexington.Google Scholar