Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T16:14:46.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Treatment of Human Remains on Navajo Lands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Anthony L. Klesert  and
Michael J. Andrews
Anthony L. Klesert
Affiliation:
Navajo Nation, Archaeology Department, P. O. Box 689, Window Rock, AT. 86515
Michael J. Andrews
Affiliation:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Navajo Area Office, P. O. Box M, Window Rock, AZ 86515
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent key federal and tribal legislation often has proved inadequate for dealing with human remains. Because of this the Navajo Nation, in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, has developed a policy establishing a working set of procedures for cultural resource managers and developers to follow in the identification, verification, and ultimate disposition of human remains on Navajo Tribal Trust land. These procedures attempt to address legal and human concerns of next of kin, local residents, the Navajo Tribe as a whole, and the federal government. The policy does not expressly advocate the scientific study of human remains prior to or instead of reburial, but this alternative is allowable under the policy, given the acquisition of appropriate consent. This paper discusses the procedures (formally adopted by Navajo Tribal Resolution) along with suggestions for their modification for use elsewhere and under other circumstances.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 310 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, D. C. 1982 Indians and Anthropologists : The Development of Cooperative Programs in Iowa. Paper presented at the 81 st Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Anderson, D. C, Zieglowsky, D., and Schermer, S. 1983 The Study of Ancient Human Skeletal Remains in Iowa : A Symposium. Office of the State Archaeologist of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
Andrews, M. J., and Klesert, A. L. 1985 Disposition of Human Remains on Navajo Lands : Proposed Procedures. Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Buikstra, J. E. 1981 A Specialist in Ancient Cemetery Studies Looks at the Reburial Issue. Early Man 3(3) : 26–27.Google Scholar
Higgenbotham, C. D. 1983 Native Americans Versus Archaeologists : The Legal Issues. American Indian Law Review 10(1) : 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, H. B. 1985 Archaeological Preservation on Indian Lands : Conflicts and Dilemmas in Applying the National Historic Preservation Act. Environmental Law 15 : 413–453.Google Scholar
Klesert, A. L. 1986 Sacred Places and CRM : Problems and Solutions from the Navajo Region. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Klesert, A. L., and Holt, H. B. 1985 Archaeologists, Native Americans and Archaeology on Indian Lands. Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, C, and Leighton, D. 1951 The Navajo. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Plog, F. T. 1984 Cultural Resource Plan— McKinley Mine : Survey Report, Evaluations of Significance, Treatment Recommendations. Submitted to Office of Surface Mining, U. S. Department of the Interior. Copies available from Department of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.Google Scholar
Quick, P. M. (editor) 1986 Proceedings, Conference on Reburial Issues. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Reichard, G. A. 1950 Navajo Religion : A Study of Symbolism. Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
Ross, R. E. 1986 Indians, Archaeologists and Burials; the Oregon Experience. Paper presented at the 51 st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Ross, R. E., and Stutzman, E. 1984 Two Views of Archaeology. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Portland.Google Scholar
Sprague, R. 1974 American Indians and American Archaeology. American Antiquity 39 : 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underhill, R. 1956 The Navajos. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Ward, A. E. 1980 Navajo Graves. Ethnohistorical Report Series No. 2. Center for Anthropological Studies, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Ward, A. E., and Brugge, D. M. 1975 Changing Contemporary Navajo Burial Practice and Values. Plateau 48(1-2) : 31–42.Google Scholar
Yarrow, H. C. 1880 Introduction to the Study of Mortuary Customs Among the North American Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Zimmerman, L. J. 1981 How the Crow Creek Archaeologists View the Question of Reburial. Early Man 3(3) : 25–26.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, L. J., and Alex, R. 1981 Digging Ancient Burials : The Crow Creek Experience. Early Man 3(3) : 3-10.Google Scholar