Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T09:09:39.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Value of Aerial Photography in Surveying Archaeological Sites in Coastal Jungle Regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ray T. Matheny
Ray T. Matheny*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heavy jungle growth prevented economical surveying of Aguacatal (Campeche, Mexico) and the adjacent area despite the efforts of two brief seasons in the field. Aerial photography was used to supplement and expeditiously complete the ground survey work. The operation was inexpensive and utilized readily available equipment such as the K-20 aerial camera. Super-XX, infrared, and color films were used on an experimental basis to determine which film was best suited for archaeologic purposes. All films were found to have special values: Super-XX — the best general film for gray tonal renditions of vegetal differentiation; infrared — for the delineation of wet areas and water courses; and color — for the maximum readability of color differences. Photographic interpretation proved reliable and allowed the archaeologist to extract topographic, ecologic, and archaeologica data from the photographs with little laboratory study.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , October 1962 , pp. 226 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous 1961 Kodak Data for Aerial Photography. Eastman Kodak Company. New York.Google Scholar
Berlin, Heinrich 1953 Archaeological Reconnaissance in Tabasco. Current Re∼ ports, No. 7. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Archaeology. Washington.Google Scholar
Bradford, John 1957 Ancient Landscapes. G. Ball and Sons, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ross T. 1960 Archaeological Investigations of Brigham Young University in Southern Mexico in 1958; Preliminary Report. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Archaeology, Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Heller, R. C., Aldrich, R. C. and Bailey, W. F. 1959 An Evaluation of Aerial Photography for Detecting Southern Pine Beerle Damage. Photogrammetric Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 595–606. Washington.Google Scholar
Jakeman, M. Wells 1952 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Xicalango Area of Western Campeche, Mexico. Bulletin of the University Archaeological Society, No. 3. Brigham Young University Provo.Google Scholar
Jakeman, M. Wells 1956 Unpublished field notes on the site of Cerrillos, Campeche, Mexico. Department of Archaeology, Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Jakeman, M. Wells 1961 Preliminary Report of Archaeological Investigations of Brigham Young University in the Xicalango Region of Southwestern Campeche, Mexico, in 1961. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Archaeology, Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Lueder, Donald R. 1959 Aerial Photographic Interpretation. McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Minard, James P. 1960 Color Aerial Photographs Facilitated Geologic Mapping on the Atlantic Coastal Plain of New Jersey. Photogrammetric Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 112–16. Washington.Google Scholar
Ruz Lhuillier, Alberto 1945 Campeche en la arqueologia maya. Acta Antropologica, Vol. 1, Nos. 2-3. Mexico.Google Scholar
Tarkington, R. G. 1953 An Aspect of Color Photography and Interpretation. Photogrammetric Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 418–20. Washington.Google Scholar