Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T09:30:57.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeological Field Sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

S. Rootenberg
S. Rootenberg*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The residue of an archaeological site, which represents a collection of cultural and noncultural materials, provides quantitative information from which some indication of cultural practices and ecological and chronological relationships can be extracted. If quantitative methods of analysis are to be successfully applied to archaeological remains, the archaeologist must either totally excavate a site, recovering all the elements in the residue, or he can devise some system of sampling it. Total excavation is seldom possible or feasible because of limited resources. Consequently, he resorts to the process of sampling, that is, excavating only a portion of the whole site. His field objective is to collect as representative a sample of elements as possible with a minimum expenditure of time, labor, and money. Achieving this objective depends upon following a sampling procedure. Stratified-cluster sampling is a method proposed to achieve this objective. A sampling design of 13 steps is presented to serve as a guide to this method.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 30 , Issue 2Part1 , October 1964 , pp. 181 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascher, R. 1959 A Prehistoric Population Estimate Using Midden Analysis and Two Population Models. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 15, pp. 168–78. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Blalock, H. 1960 Social Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. and Heizer, R. F. 1951 The Physical Analysis of Nine Indian Mounds of the Lower Sacramento Valley. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 40, pp. 281–312. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. 1960 Physical Analysis of Habitation Residues. In “The Application of Quantitative Methods in Archaeology,” edited by Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S., pp. 93–124. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 28. New York.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S. F. 1956 Some Aspects of the Quantitative Approach in Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 12, pp. 229–48. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. W. 1950 Observations on the Efficiency of Shovel Archaeology. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 7, pp. 15-21. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. W. 1959 A New Method for the Sedation of Archaeological Collections. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 203–11. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meighan, C. W. 1961 The Archaeologist's Note Book. Chandler Publishing Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. W., Pendergast, D. M., Swartz, B. K. Jr., and Wissler, M. D. 1958 Ecological Interpretation in Archaeology, Part I. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1–23. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Parten, M. 1950 Surveys, Polls, and Samples: Practical Procedures. Harper & Bros., New York.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. W. 1948 A Study of Archaeology. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, No. 69. Menasha.Google Scholar
Treganza, A. E. and Cook, S. F. 1948 The Quantitative Investigation of Aboriginal Sites: Complete Excavation with Physical and Archaeological Analysis of a Single Mound. American Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 287–97. Menasha.Google Scholar
Vescelius, G. S. 1960 Archaeological Sampling: A Problem of Statistical Inference. In Essays in the Science of Culture in Honor of Leslie A. White, edited by Dole, G. and Carneiro, R., pp. 457–68. Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York.Google Scholar