Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T16:58:31.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Butchering and Stone Tool Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Phillip L. Walker*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106

Abstract

Experiments were performed to determine the effectiveness of obsidian tools with different forms of edge treatment for animal processing. For most butchering tasks, primary flakes with unmodified working edges were more effective than bifacially pressure-flaked tools. The data presented indicate considerable variability among animal species in the demands placed on tools used for specific butchering tasks. It is suggested that consideration by prehistoric hunters of factors such as tool longevity and raw material availability could have resulted in the use of butchering tools with less than optimal cutting characteristics.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Brose, D. S. 1975 Functional analysis of stone tools : a cautionary note on the role of animal fats. American Antiquity 48 : 86103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, D. E., and Davis, E. L. 1968 Experimental manufacture of wooden implements with tools of flaked stone. Science 159 : 426428.Google Scholar
Fletcher, A. C, and La Flesche, F. 1911 The Omaha tribe. Bureau of American Ethnography, Annual Report 27.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. M. R. 1974 Studies in maritime hunting II : an analysis of walrus hunting and utilization : South-1975 Hampton Island N. W. T. 1970. Folk 16-17 : 147158.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1973 The Wardell buffalo trap, 48 SU 301 : communal procurement in the upper Green River Basin, Wyoming. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology Anthropological Papers No. 48.Google Scholar
Gould, R. A. 1967 Notes on hunting, butchering and sharing of game among the Ngatatjara and theirneighbors in the West Australian Desert. Krober Anthropological Society Papers No. 36. Google Scholar
Gould, R. A., Koster, D. A., and Sontz, A. H. L. 1971 The lithic assemblage of the western desert aborigines of Australia. American Antiquity 36 : 149169.Google Scholar
Guilday, J. E., Parmalee, P. W., and Tanner, D. B. 1962 Aboriginal butchering techniques at the Eschelman site (36La 12), Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 32 : 5983.Google Scholar
Hester, T. R., Wuertele, E., and Heiser, R. F. 1976 Unifacial cobble tools from the northwest California coast : experimental and wear pattern notes. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 33 : 2543.Google Scholar
Keeley, L. H. 1974 Technique and methodology in microwear studies : a critical review. Worid Archaeology 5 : 233336.Google Scholar
Kehoe, T. F., and Kehoe, A. B. 1960 Observations on the butchering techniques at a prehistoric bison-kill in Montana. American Antiquity 25 : 420423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. K. 1969 Hunters of the northern ice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Nero, R. W. 1957 A “graver” site in Wisconsin. American Antiquity 22 : 300304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraydar, S., and Shimada, I. 1973 Experimental archaeology : a new outlook. American Antiquity 38 : 344350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, V. B. 1948 Use of fur-seal carcasses by natives of the Pribil of Islands, Alaska. Pacific Northwest Quarterly 39 : 131133.Google Scholar
Semenov, S. A. 1964 Prehistoric technology (translated by Thompson, M. W.). Cory Adams and Mackay, London.Google Scholar
Tanno, T. 1976 The Mbuti net-hunters in the Ituri forest, eastern Zaire—their hunting activities and band composition. Kyoto University African Studies 10 : 101135.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. I. 1974 Sanuma Fauna : prohibitions and classifications. Fundacion La Salle de Ciencias Naturales Institute Caribe de Anthropologic y Sociologia, Caracas, Monograph No. 18.Google Scholar
Tringham, R. G. Cooper, Odell, G., Boytek, B., and Whitman, A. 1974 Experimentation in the formation of edge damage : a new approach to lithic analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1 : 171196.Google Scholar
Walker, P. L., and Long, J. C. 1977 An experimental study of the morphological characteristics of tool marks. American Antiquity 42 : 605616.Google Scholar
Wheat, J. B. 1972 The Olsen-Chubbuck site : A Paleo-Indian bison kill. Society for American Archaeology, Memoir No. 26.Google Scholar
White, T. E. 1953 Observations on the butchering technique of some aboriginal peoples, No. 2. American Antiquity 19 : 160164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. E. 1954 Observations on the butchering technique of some aboriginal peoples : Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6. American Antiquity 19 : 254-264.Google Scholar