Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbjwg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T07:20:05.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ceramic Stratigraphy in a Georgia Village Site

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Gordon R. Willey
Gordon R. Willey*
Affiliation:
Ocmulgee National Monument (CCC) in 1937-38
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is limited to the presentation of the stratigraphic relationships of certain pottery types which are found in a pre-historic village site in central Georgia. These types are site markers of two established cultural horizons in the southeast, and it is evident that their wide distribution and relationships to the chronological framework of the area are of major archaeological importance. In a recently published report of investigations centering in and around Macon, Georgia, A. R. Kelly demonstrates that the Lamar and Swift Creek horizons are differentiated from each other and from other cultural complexes in the region by distinctive traits. Foremost among these traits, for each complex, is pottery.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , October 1939 , pp. 140 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

295 Kelley, A. R., A Preliminary Report on Archaeological Explorations at Macon, Georgia. Anthropological Papers, No. 1, Bulletin 119, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, 1938, pp. 25–31.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. D., Recent Excavations at the Lamar Site, Ocmulgee National Monument, Macon, Georgia. Mimeographed publication, Ocmulgee National Monument, Macon, Georgia, 1939. (Jennings suggests a tentative alignment of the Swift Creek and Lamar cultural horizons within the “Midwestern Taxonomic Scheme.” Swift Creek is described as an early aspect of the Woodland pattern. Lamar is considered a focus embodying both Mississippi and Woodland pattern traits.)

296 Kelly, A. R., Op. cit., pp. 47–48.Google Scholar

297 Kelly, A. R., Op. cit. pp. 56–57.Google Scholar

298 Observations on vessel shape have been deduced from comparative Lamar ma terial from the Lamar site, although, rim forms from Cowart's Landing bear out the assumptions.

299 Kelly, A. R., Op. cit., pp. 46–50, pl. 12a.Google Scholar

Holmes, W. H., Report on Aboriginal Pottery of the Southeastern United States. Twentieth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, 1903, pp. 131–134.Google Scholar

Jennings, J. D., and Fairbanks, C. H., Southeastern Archaeological Conference Newsletter (Mimeo.) Vol. 1, No. 2, 1939.Google Scholar (Since this manuscript was originally submitted, a thorough description of Lamar Complicated Stamped and Lamar Bold Incised has been circulated as a mimeographed publication.)

Moore, C. B., Certain Aboriginal Mounds of the Georgia Coast. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, Second Series, Vol. XI, Part I, 1897 (Vessels on pis. IX and X show design and shape similarities to both Lamar types.)Google Scholar

300 Kelly, A. R., Op. cit., pp. 27–29, Pl. 11a.Google Scholar

Holmes, W. H., Op. cit., pls. LXXXVII and LXXXVIII.Google Scholar

Moore, C. B., Certain Aboriginal Remains of the Northwest Florida Coast. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, Second Series, Vol. XII, Part 2, 1902.Google Scholar (Numerous sherds and vessels which show relationship to Swift Creek Complicated Stamped on the basis of design.)

Jennings, J. D., and Fairbanks, C. H., Op. cit., Type description of Swift Creek Complicated Stamped.Google Scholar

Haag, W. G., Southeastern Archaeological Conference Newsletter (Mimeo.) Vol. 1, 1939.Google Scholar (Swift Creek Complicated Stamped and Pickwick Complicated Stamped show design similarity.)

301 Jennings, J. D., and Fairbanks, C. H., Op. cit., type description of Mossy Oak Simple Stamped, formerly Vining Simple Stamped.Google Scholar

302 Kelly, A. R., Op. cit., (Kelly discusses these types on pp. 22, 30–31, and 58–60.)Google Scholar