Article contents
Comment on Harry's Discussion of Ceramic Specialization and Agricultural Marginality in the Prehistoric U.S. Southwest
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
Karen Harry's study indicates that agricultural marginality is an unlikely explanation for ceramic specialization in the prehistoric U.S. Southwest. Economic theory provides an alternative model for the exchange of pottery for food.
El estudio de Karen Harry indica que la marginalidad agrícola no es la explicación para la especializacion cerámica, por lo menos en el suroeste de los EE. UU. La teoría económica provee un modelo alternativo para el intercambio de cerámica por alimentos.
- Type
- Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2006
References
References Cited
Harry, Karen G.
2005
Ceramic Specialization and Agricultural Marginality: Do Ethnographic Models Explain the Development of Specialized Pottery Production in the Prehistoric American Southwest?
American Antiquity
70:295–319.Google Scholar
Mills, Barbara J. (editor) 2004
Identity, Feasting, and the Archaeology of the Greater Southwest.
University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Phillips, David A. Jr. 1979 Material Culture and Trade of the Postclassic Maya. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Phillips, David A. Jr., and Rathje, William L.
1977
Streets Ahead: Exchange Values and the Rise of the Classic Maya. In Social Process in Maya Prehistory: Studies in Honour of Sir Eric Thompson, edited by Norman Hammond, pp. 103–112. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David
1911
Principles of Political Economy and Taxation.
J. M. Dent and Sons, London.Google Scholar
Snider, Delbert A.
1975
Introduction to International Economics.
Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by