Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T03:17:52.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Weymouth's “X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Prehistoric Pottery”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Prudence M. Rice
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weymouth's X-ray diffraction analysis of prehistoric pottery necessitates a reevaluation of what diffraction peaks and "groupings" of peaks mean culturally. Specifically, archaeologists need to clarify what they mean by "temper" and what "temper" means behaviorally. X-ray diffraction will not screen out naturally occurring inclusions in the clay from those added by potters; consequently, X-ray data based on mineral ratios cannot necessarily be interpreted culturally as "temper" added by potters.

Type
Comment
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 39 , Issue 4Part1 , October 1974 , pp. 619 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shepard, Anna O 1956 Ceramics for the archaeologist. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 609. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O 1964 Temper identification: technological sherdsplitting or an unanswered challenge. American Antiquity 29:518-520 Google Scholar