Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T22:29:38.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Law of the Sea Treaty and Underwater Cultural Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David R. Watters*
Affiliation:
Section of Man, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Abstract

The Convention on the Law of the Sea, the culminating document of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, received favorable votes from 130 States in April 1982. The United States voted against approval. Articles 149 and 303, which address archaeological and historical objects found in various ocean zones, are compromise measures with ambiguous texts that are subject to interpretation. Archaeologists generally, not simply underwater archaeologists, should be concerned with these provisions because they could set an unfortunate precedent for future international negotiations involving cultural resources, and because they may apply to inundated prehistoric sites as well as to shipwrecks.

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Arnold, J. Barto III 1978 Some Thoughts on Salvage Law and Historic Preservation. Internationai Journal of Nautical Archaeology 7:173176.Google Scholar
Bascom, Willard 1976 Deep Water, Ancient Ships. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
Bass, George 1980 Marine Archaeology: A Misunderstood Science. In Ocean Yearbook 2, edited by Elisabeth Mann, Borgese and Norton, Ginsburg, pp. 137152. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Brown, E. D. 1981 Delimitation of Offshore Areas: Hard Labour and Bitter Fruits at UNCLOS III. Marine Policy 5:172184.Google Scholar
Cockrell, Wilburn A. 1980 The Trouble with Treasure—A Preservationist View of the Controversy. American Antiquity 45:333339.Google Scholar
Masters, P. M., and Flemming, N. C. (editors) 1983 Quaternary Coast Jines and Marine Archaeoiogy: Towards the Prehistory of Land Bridges and Continental Shelves. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Migliorino, Luigi 1982 Submarine Antiquities and the Law of the Sea. Marine Policy Reports 4(4):15. University of Delaware Center for Study of Marine Policy.Google Scholar
Nautilus Press 1982 Diving 6- Submersible News, July, 2(7): 15. Nautilus Press, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) 1982 U. S. S. Monitor National Marine Sanctuary Management Plan. U. S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
O'Keefe, Patrick J. 1981 Current Developments Regarding Regulation of Marine Archaeology Outside Territorial Waters. In Underwater Archaeology: The Challenge Be/ore Us; Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Underwater Archaeology, edited by Watts, Gordon P. Jr. Fathom Eight Special Publication 2:338347. Fathom Eight, San Marino, Calif.Google Scholar
Oxman, Bernard H. 1981 The United Nations Conference of the Law of the Sea: The Ninth Session (1980). The American Journal of International Law 75:211256.Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel V., and O'Keefe, P. J. 1978 International Legal Protection for the Underwater Cultural Heritage. Revue Beige de droit international 14:85103.Google Scholar
Ross, David A., and Knauss, John A. 1982 How the Law of the Sea Treaty Will Affect U. S. Marine Science. Science 217:10031008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruppe, Reynold J. 1981 Letter to the Editor. Science 214:132.Google Scholar
Scholz, Wesley S. 1980 Oceanic Research: International Law and National Legislation. Marine Poiicy 4:91127.Google Scholar
Wade, Nicholas 1981 Galleon Yields Gold, Silver, and Archaeology. Science 212:14861487.Google Scholar
Watters, David R. 1981 Linking Oceanography to Prehistoric Archaeology. Oceanus 24(2):1119.Google Scholar