Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T16:07:56.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Little Sycamore Site and the Early Milling Stone Cultures of Southern California*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William James Wallace
William James Wallace*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Presence in the southern California coastal region of prehistoric cultures showing considerable use of milling stones has been recognized for some years. Attention was called to this fact by the publication in 1929 of David Banks Rogers’ Prehistoric Man of the Santa Barbara Coast. Rogers distinguished a sequence of three aboriginal cultures in the Santa Barbara area, the earliest of which (Oak Grove) was characterized by the employment of this form of grinding implement almost to the exclusion of other artifacts. In the same year Malcolm J. Rogers noted a somewhat analogous complex (now La Jolla) in western San Diego County (M. J. Rogers 1929: 456-7). Occurrences of similar assemblages have been reported upon since (Treganza and Malamud 1950; Walker 1952).

An investigation conducted at the Little Sycamore site (Ven 1) in Ventura County by a class in archaeological field methods from the University of Southern California uncovered evidence of yet another milling stone complex.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , October 1954 , pp. 112 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The photographic illustrations were prepared by Roger J. Desautels and Edith S. Taylor. Figure 39 was drawn by Desautels. The unmodified mammal and bird bones were identified by Jack Nicoll, major student in anthropology and zoology at the University of Southern California. The identification of stone materials was made by Richard H. Merriam, Associate Professor, Department of Geology, University of Southern California.

References

Campbell, E. W. C. AND CAMPBELL, W. H. 1935 The Pinto Basin Site. Southwest Museum Papers, No. 9. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
CARTER, G. F. 1941 Archaeological Notes on a Midden at Point Sal. American Antiquity, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 214–26. Menasha.Google Scholar
GLADWIN, H. S. 1937 Excavations at Snaketown. Comparisons and Theories. Medallion Papers, No. 26. Globe.Google Scholar
HARDING, M. 1951 La Jollan Culture. El Museo, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 10–11, 31–8. San Diego.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, M. H. 1948a A New Pinto Site. The Masterkey, Vol. 22, No. 4. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, M. H. 1948b An Ancient Site at Borax Lake, California. Southwest Museum Papers, No. 16. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
HAURY, E. W. 1950 The Stratigraphy and Archaeology of Ventana Cave, Arizona. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
HEIZER, R. F. 1949 The Archaeology of Central California 1: The Early Horizon. University of California Anthropological Records, Vol. 12, No. 1. Berkeley.Google Scholar
HEIZER, R. F. AND FENENGA, F. 1939 Archaeological Horizons in Central California. American Anthropologist, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 378–99. Menasha.Google Scholar
HEIZER, R. F. AND LEMERT, E. M. 1947 Observations on Archaeological Sites in Topanga Canyon, California, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 44, No. 2. Berkeley.Google Scholar
HOLT, W. B. 1937 Trio of Adventurers. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Leaflet, Vol. 12, No. 1.Google Scholar
KRIEGER, A. D. 1953 New World Culture History: Anglo America. In Anthropology Today, edited by Kroeber, A. L., pp. 238–64. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LIBBY, W. F. 1952 Radiocarbon Dating. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MACGOWAN, KENNETH 1950 Early Man in the New World. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
OLSON, R. L. 1930 Chumash Prehistory. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 28, No. 1. Berkeley.Google Scholar
ORR, P. C. 1943 Archaeology of Mescalitan Island and Customs of the Canalino. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Occasional Papers, No. 5.Google Scholar
ORR, P. C. 1952 Review of “Santa Barbara Channel Archaeology.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 211–26. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
ROGERS, D. B. 1929 Prehistoric Man of the Santa Barbara Coast.Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
ROGERS, M. J. 1929 The Stone Art of the San Dieguito Plateau. American Anthropologist, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 454–67. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROGERS, M. J. 1939 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent Desert Areas. San Diego Museum Papers, No. 3.Google Scholar
ROGERS, M. J. 1945 An Outline of Yuman Prehistory. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 167–98. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
SAUER, C. O. 1945 Early Relations of Man to Plants. Geographical Review, Vol. 37, pp. 1–25. New York.Google Scholar
SAYLES, E. B. AND ANTEVS, ERNST 1941 The Cochise Culture. Medallion Papers, No. 24. Globe.Google Scholar
TREGANZA, A. E. AND MALAMUD, C. G. 1950 The Topanga Culture. First Season’s Excavation of the Tank Site, 1947. University of California Anthropological Records, Vol. 12, No. 4. Berkeley.Google Scholar
WALKER, E. F. 1951 Five Prehistoric Archaeological Sites in Los Angeles County, California. Publications of the Frederick Webb Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund, Vol. 6. Southwest Museum, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
WEDEL, W. R. 1941 Archaeological Investigations at Buena Vista Lake, Kern County, California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 130. Washington.Google Scholar