Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Aranyosi, E.F.
1999.
Wasteful Advertising and Variance Reduction: Darwinian Models for the Significance of Nonutilitarian Architecture.
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
356.
Goebel, Ted
1999.
Pleistocene human colonization of Siberia and peopling of the Americas: An ecological approach.
Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 6,
p.
208.
Cannon, Michael D.
2000.
Large Mammal Relative Abundance in Pithouse and Pueblo Period Archaeofaunas from Southwestern New Mexico: Resource Depression among the Mimbres-Mogollon?.
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
317.
Rick, Torben C.
and
Erlandson, Jon M.
2000.
Early Holocene Fishing Strategies on the California Coast: Evidence from CA-SBA-2057.
Journal of Archaeological Science,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 7,
p.
621.
Ladefoged, Thegn N.
and
Graves, Michael W.
2000.
Evolutionary Theory and the Historical Development of Dry-Land Agriculture in North Kohala, Hawai'i.
American Antiquity,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
423.
Neff, Hector
2000.
On Evolutionary Ecology and Evolutionary Archaeology: Some Common Ground?.
Current Anthropology,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 3,
p.
427.
Fitzhugh, Ben
2001.
Risk and Invention in Human Technological Evolution.
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
125.
Neff, H.
2001.
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
p.
5007.
Smith, Craig S.
Martin, William
and
Johansen, Kristine A.
2001.
Sego Lilies and Prehistoric Foragers: Return Rates, Pit Ovens, and Carbohydrates.
Journal of Archaeological Science,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
169.
Ugan, Andrew
and
Bright, Jason
2001.
Measuring Foraging Efficiency with Archaeological Faunas: The Relationship Between Relative Abundance Indices and Foraging Returns.
Journal of Archaeological Science,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 12,
p.
1309.
MacDonald, Douglas H.
2001.
Grief and Burial in the American Southwest: The Role of Evolutionary Theory in the Interpretation of Mortuary Remains.
American Antiquity,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 4,
p.
704.
Neeley, Michael P.
2002.
Going Microlithic: A Levantine Perspective on the Adoption of Microlithic Technologies.
Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
45.
Fitzhugh, Ben
2002.
Beyond Foraging and Collecting.
p.
257.
Bird, Douglas W.
Richardson, Jennifer L.
Veth, Peter M.
and
Barham, Anthony J.
2002.
Explaining Shellfish Variability in Middens on the Meriam Islands, Torres Strait, Australia.
Journal of Archaeological Science,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 5,
p.
457.
Thomas, Frank R.
2002.
An evaluation of central-place foraging among mollusk gatherers in Western Kiribati, Micronesia: Linking behavioral ecology with ethnoarchaeology.
World Archaeology,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 1,
p.
182.
Bamforth, Douglas B.
2002.
Evidence and Metaphor in Evolutionary Archaeology.
American Antiquity,
Vol. 67,
Issue. 3,
p.
435.
Hildebrandt, William R.
and
McGuire, Kelly R.
2002.
The Ascendance of Hunting during the California Middle Archaic: An Evolutionary Perspective.
American Antiquity,
Vol. 67,
Issue. 2,
p.
231.
Gremillion, Kristen J.
2002.
Foraging Theory and Hypothesis Testing in Archaeology: An Exploration of Methodological Problems and Solutions.
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
142.
Broughton, Jack M.
2002.
Prey spatial structure and behavior affect archaeological tests of optimal foraging models: Examples from the Emeryville Shellmound vertebrate fauna.
World Archaeology,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 1,
p.
60.
Cannon, Michael D
2003.
A model of central place forager prey choice and an application to faunal remains from the Mimbres Valley, New Mexico.
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.