Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T08:47:49.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Radiocarbon Dates from Tikal and the Maya Calendar Correlation Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Elizabeth K. Ralph
Elizabeth K. Ralph*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Radiocarbon dates for samples from three buildings at Tikal, Guatemala, the lintel beams of which bear Maya hieroglyphs, are presented. These include dates recently determined at the University of California at Los Angeles and two UCLA and University of Pennsylvania inter-laboratory cross-checks. Two dates from the inner and outer portions of a sapote log have been determined in order to assess the growth rates of the logs from which the temple beams were fashioned and thereby help to explain some of the differences among radiocarbon dates which were previously determined. The dates for samples considered to be reliable continue to support the Goodman-Thompson-Martinez “Correlation B” hypothesis for Temples IV and I, but they also indicate that the previous chronological interpretation of the hieroglyphs of Structure 10 should be revised.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , April 1965 , pp. 421 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broecker, W. S., Olsen, E. A., and Bird, J. 1959 Radiocarbon Measurements on Samples of Known Age. Nature, Vol. 183, pp. 1582–4. London.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R. and Griffin, J. B. 1959 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates IV. American Journal of Science, Radiocarbon Supplement, Vol. 1, pp. 190–1. New Haven.Google Scholar
Ferguseon, G. J. 1958 Reduction of Atmospheric Radiocarbon Concentration by Fossil Fuel Carbon Dioxide and the Mean Life of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere. Proceedings of the Royal Society, A, Vol. 243, p. 561. London.Google Scholar
Ferousson, G. J. and Libby, W. F. 1963 UCLA Radiocarbon Dates II. Radiocarbon, Vol. 5, pp. 13–15. New Haven.Google Scholar
Godwin, H. 1962 Half-life of Radiocarbon. Nature, Vol. 195, p. 984. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulp, J. L., Feely, H. W., and Tryon, L. E. 1951 Lamont Natural Radiocarbon Measurements, I. Science, Vol. 114, p. 566. Washington.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F. 1955 Radiocarbon Dating. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ralph, E. K. 1961 Radiocarbon “Effective” Half-life for Maya Calendar Correlations. American Antiquity, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 229–30. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ralph, E. K. and Stuckenrath, R. 1960 Carbon-14 Measurements of Known Age Samples. Nature, Vol. 188, pp. 185–7. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterthwaite, L. 1961 Inscriptions and Other Dating Controls. In “Tikal Reports, Numbers 5-10,” by Adams, Richard E. W. and others, pp. 47–78. Museum Monographs, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, L. and Ralph, E. K. 1960 New Radiocarbon Dates and the Maya Correlation Problem. American Antiquity, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 165–84. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Smiley, C. H. 1963 Radiocarbon Dates and the Mayan Correlation Problem. Nature, Vol. 199, pp. 473–4. London.Google Scholar